Abstract
Conventional myelography was compared with a new type of MR technique using a fat-suppressing 3D fast imaging with steady precession (FISP) sequence for diagnosis of the lumbar root compression syndrome. 80 patients with discogenic disease in the lumbar spine were examined with a 1.0-T whole-body MR system (Siemens Magnetom Impact, Erlangen, Germany). A strongly T2*-weighted 3D FISP sequence was applied in the sagittal orientation. To obtain fat suppression, a frequency-selective 1-3-3-1 prepulse was applied prior to the imaging sequence. The acquired 3D data set was evaluated using a maximum intensity projection (MIP) program. The measurement time was 7 min, 47 s. Magnetic resonance myelography has significant advantages over conventional myelography, particularly in cases of extreme spinal canal stenosis. Compared with the conventional method, this new MR technique shows comparable sensitivity in the visualization of the spinal nerve roots in the lumbar spine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Modic MT, Masaryk A, Boumphrey F, Goormastic M, Bell G (1986) Lumbar herniated disc disease and canal stenosis: prospective evaluation by surface coil MR, CT, and myelography. AJR 147: 757
Roos JS, Masaryk TJ, Schrader M, Gerntili A, Bohiman H, Modic MT (1990) MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: assessment with gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJNR 11: 771
Hueftle EM, Modic MT, Ross IS, Mararyk JK, Carter JR, Wilber RG, Bohlmann HH, Steinberg PM, Delamarter RB (1988) Lumbar spine: postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DPTA. Radiology 167: 817
Enzmann DR, Rubin JB (1988) Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient refocused pulse sequence. General considerations and disc disease. Radiology 166: 467
Haacke EM, Wielopolski PA, Tkach KA, Modic MT (1990) Steady-state free precession imaging in the presence of motion: application for improved visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid. Radiology 175: 545
Gyngell ML, Palmer ND, Eastvvood LM (1986) The application of steady-state free precession SFP in 2D-FT-MR imaging (abstract). In: Book of abstracts. Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Berkeley, Calif. p. 666
Gyngell ML (1988) Application of steady-state free precession in radid 2DFT NMR imaging: fast and CE-fast sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 6: 415
Gyngell ML (1988) The steady-state signals in short-repetition-time sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 81: 474
Oppelt A, Graumann R, Barfuss H, Hartl W, Schajor (1986) FISP: Eine neue schnelle Pulssequenz fur die Kernspintomographie. Elektromedica 54 (1)
Zisch R, Hollenbach HP, Artmann W (1992) Lumbar myelography with three-dimensional MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2 (6): 731
Schnarkoski P, Wallner B, Goldmann A, Friedrich M (1993) MR-Myelographie der Lendenwirbelsaule mit einer PSIF-Sequenz: Erste Erfahrungen. Akt Radiol 3: 53
Hore PJ (1983) Solvent suppression in Fourier-transform nuclear magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson 55: 283
Lang J (1984) Lendenwirbelsaulenerkrankungen mit Beteiligung des Nervensytems. Neuroorthopädie 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p. 27
Langlotz M (1981) Lumbale Myelographie mit wasserlöslichen Kontrastmitteln. Thieme, Stuttgart
Tosch U, Baerwald R, Schubens P, Sander B, Lanksch R, Schörner W, Felix R (1992) Die “chirurgische Projektion” in der Gadolinium-DPTA (Gd-DPTA): unterstütziten kernspintomographischen Diagnostik des lateralen Bandscheibenvorfalles. Fortschr Röntgenstr 156: 160
Eberhardt KEW, Hollenbach HP, Deimling M, Huk WJ, Pahnke J (1995) High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the endolymphatic duct and sac. MAGMA 3: 77–81
Steiner H (1989) MR-Tomographie nach lumbalen Bandscheibenoperationen: Differentialdiagnostische Möglichkeiten durch Gd-DPTA. Fortschr Röntgenstr 151: 179
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eberhardt, K.E.W., Hollenbach, H.P., Tomandl, B. et al. Three-dimensional MR myelography of the lumbar spine: comparative case study to X-ray myelography. Eur. Radiol. 7, 737–742 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742936
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742936