Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The cultural and social incorporation of sociological knowledge

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Any evaluation of sociology as a discipline ought to focus not only on the way sociology is produced, but also on how it is consumed. In this article, we examine the degree to which sociological concepts have been incorporated into the vernacular of American society, the impact of sociological techniques and methods on politics and society, and the relationship between sociology and public policy. While sociologists often point to the problems caused by a certain alienation from the general culture—for example the notion that sociology is written in an obtuse language that the public cannot comprehend—we point to the problems that develop when sociology is too readily incorporated into American culture and society. The danger is that the more popular sociology is, the less likely it will be to maintain the sharp intellectual edge that made its incorporation possible in the first place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, William and Paul Starr. 1986.The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. 1992. “Sociology: A Disinvitation?”Society, 30 (November/December): 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. and William C. Rau. 1992. “Sociology in the 1990s.”Society, 30 (November/December): 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, Janet Mancini. 1993. “Sociologists Participate in Focus Group Training.”Footnotes, January, p. 6.

  • Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. 1989. “The Real and Unrealized Contributions of Quantitative Sociology.”American Sociological Review, 54 (June): 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, Leo. 1984.Strategy in Advertising. 2d ed. Chicago: Crain Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, Martin. 1991. “The Decline of the Social Survey Movement and the Rise of American Empirical Sociology.” In Martin Bulmer Kevin Bales, and Kathryn Kish Sklar, (eds.),The Social Survey in Historical Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 291–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, Martin, Kevin Bales and Kathryn Kish Sklar. 1991. “The Social Survey in Historical Perspective.” In Bulmer, Bales and Sklar, 1–48.

  • Cherlin, Andrew. 1988.The Changing American Family and Public Policy. Washington: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. 1966.Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 1986. “Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums?”American Journal of Sociology, 91 (May): 1336–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Jean M. 1987.Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890–1960. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Louis A., Charles Kadushin, and Walter W. Powell. 1982.Books: The Culture and Commerce of Publishing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Diana and Henry Small. 1992. “American Sociology Since the Seventies: The Emerging Identity Crisis in the Discipline.” In Terence C. Halliday and Morris Janowitz, (eds.),Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, Irving. 1988.Pre-Election Polling: Sources of Accuracy Land Error. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, Richard Y. 1982. “Indicators of Consumer Behavior: The University of Michigan Survey of Consumers.”Public Opinion Quarterly, 46: 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, William V. 1992. “Recruiting Sociologists in a Time of Changing Opportunities.” In Halliday and Janowitz, 99–136.

  • Darden, Donna K. 1992. “Thou Shalt Not … Commit a Social Science.”Sociological Spectrum, 12: 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, Robert. 1994. “Lifestyle.”The Wilson Quarterly, 1: 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, Frank F. and Andrew Cherlin. 1991.Divided Families: What Happens to Children When Parents Part. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, Herbert 1990. “Deconstructing the Underclass: The Term’s Dangers as a Planning Concept.”Journal of the American Planning Association, 56: 271–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, Benjamin. 1986.The Captive Public: How Mass Opinion Promotes State Power. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1970.The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. L. 1990. “Sociologists’ Assessments of the State of Sociology.”The American Sociologist, 22: 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, Susan. 1993.Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Irving Louis. 1993.The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, Richard. 1976.Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s Struggle for Equality. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, Mirra. 1975.Sociology and Public Policy: The Case of Presidential Commissions. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Richard. 1988.Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Everett Carll and John Benson. 1922. “The Growth of News Polls in American Politics.” In Thomas E. Mann and Gary R. Orren, (eds.),Media Polls in American Politics. Washington: The Brookings Institution, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, Edward O. et al. 1994.The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul, William H. Sewell and Harold L. Wilensky. 1967.The Uses of Sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, Nicholas. 1991.The Promised Land: The Great Black Migration and How It Changed America. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Thomas E. and Gary R. Orren. 1992. “To Poll or Not to Poll … and Other Questions.” In Mann and Orren, 1–18.

  • Massey, Douglas and Nancy A. Denton. 1993.American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Donald. 1985.The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLenahan, Sarah. 1991. “The Two Faces of Divorce: Women’s and Children’s Interests.” In Joan Huber, (ed.),Macro-Micro Linkages in Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLenahan, Sarah and Irving Garfinkel. 1986.Single Mothers and Their Children: A New American Dilemma. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. and Patricia Kendall. 1946. “The Focussed Interview.”American Journal of Sociology, 51: 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. and Paul K. Hatt. 1949. “Election Polling Forecasts and Public Images of Social Science: A Case Study in the Shaping of Opinion Among a Strategic Public.”Public Opinion Quarterly, 13: 185–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K., Marjorie Fiske, and Patricia L. Kendall, (ed.) [1956] 1990.The Focussed Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures. Second Edition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1982. “Our Sociological Vernacular.” In Robert K. Merton,Social Research and the Practicing Professions, Aaron Rosenblatt and Thomas F. Gieryn, (eds.) Cambridge, Mass: Abt Books, 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1965] 1993.On the Shoulders of Giants. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968.Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David L. and Margaret T. Spanish. 1984. “Focus Groups: A New Tool for Qualitative Research.”Qualitative Sociology, 7: 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David L. 1988.Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, Frederick, Herbert H. Hyman, Philip J. McCarthy, Eli S. Marks. 1949.The Prediction Polls of 1948. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Daniel P. 1967.Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding: Community Action in the War on Poverty. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, Lee and William L. Yancey. 1967.The Moynihan Report and the Politics of Controversy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, Philip. 1966.The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith after Freud. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, Patricia A. and Katherine Jones. 1993. “Shifting Gender Boundaries: Women’s Inroads into Academic Sociology.” Paper presented at the 1991 Annual Meetings, American Sociological Association, Cincinnati, Ohio.

  • Roper, Burns. 1986. “Evaluating Polls with Poll Data,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 50: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Eleanor. 1988. “Surveys in the Mass Media.” In Herbert J. O’Gorman, (ed.),Surveying Social Life: Papers in Honor of Herbert H. Hyman. Middletown, Conn: Wesleyan University Press, 413–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tom W. 1989. “The Hidden 25 Percent: An Analysis of Nonresponse on the 1980 General Social Survey.” In Eleanor Singer and Stanley Presser, (eds.),Survey Research Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 50–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • ---. 1992. “Who, What, When, Where, and Why: An Analysis of the Usage of the General Social Survey, 1972–1991.” GSS Project Report # 18, National Opinion Research Center.

  • Steech, Charlotte. 1989. “Trends in Nonresponse Rates, 1952–1979.” In Singer and Presser, 32–49.

  • Stewart, David W., and Prem N. Shamdasani. 1990.Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Stephen Park and Jonathan H. Turner. 1990.The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Barbara Dafoe. 1993. “Dan Quayle Was Right.”The Atlantic (April): 47–84.

  • Wilson, William Julius. 1980.The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987.The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Alan 1990. “Books versus Journals: Two Ways of Publishing Sociology,”Sociological Forum, 5 (September): 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. “Weak Sociology/Strong Sociologists: Consequences and Contradictions of a Field in Turmoil.”Social Research, 59: 759–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, Dennis. 1990. “The Influence of Sociological Ideas on American Culture.” In Herbert Gans, (ed.),Sociology in America. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. “The Present Condition of American Sociology: A Review Article.”Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15 (January): 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Harriet. 1988. “The Role of the Role Model: The Other Side of a Sociological Coinage.” In Hesbert J. O’Gorman, (ed.),Surveying Social Life: Papers in Honor of Herbert H. Hyman. Middletown, Conn: Wesleyan University Press, 119–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Columbia University and Foundation Scholar of the Russell Sage Foundation, USA

    Robert K. Merton (University Professor Emeritus)

Authors
  1. Robert K. Merton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Wolfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merton, R.K., Wolfe, A. The cultural and social incorporation of sociological knowledge. Am Soc 26, 15–39 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692031

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692031

Keywords

Search

Navigation