Skip to main content
Log in

Alcoholism screening questionnaires

Are they valid in elderly medical outpatients?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity of the CAGE (cut down, annoyed, guilty feelings, eye-opener) questionnaire and the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) in distinguishing between elderly patients with and without alcohol abuse or dependence disorders.

Design: A cross-sectional study, in which patients were interviewed with a “gold standard,” the alcohol module of the Revised Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS-III-R), and two screening questionnaires: the CAGE and the MAST.

Setting: The study was conducted in the outpatient medical practice of a university teaching hospital.

Patients: All English-speaking continuity patients 65 years of age or older able to participate were eligible; complete data were available for 154 (91%) of the 170 people who agreed to participate.

Results: Sixty-seven patients (44%) were active drinkers, whereas 87 (56%) reported abstinence. Twenty-five patients (16%) metDiagnostic and Statistical Manual ofMental Disorders-III-Revised (DSM-III-R) criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence. A CAGE score of 2, the conventional cutoff point, had a sensitivity and a specificity of 48% and 99%, respectively. A MAST score of 5, the originally recommended cutoff point, had a sensitivity and a specificity of 52% and 91%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.91 for the CAGE and 0.61 for the MAST.

Conclusion: The CAGE and the MAST were both characterized by low sensitivities at conventional cufoff points, but the CAGE was significantly more effective than the MAST in discriminating between elderly medical outpatients with and without alcohol abuse or dependence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Epidemiology. In: Seventh Special Report to the U.S. Congress on Alcohol and Health. Rockville, MD: DHHS, 1990 (Publ. No. ADM 90-1656); 13–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams WL, Gary PJ, Rhyne R, et al. Alcohol intake in the healthy elderly: changes with age in a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:211–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Molgaard CA, Nahamura CM, Stanford EP, et al. Prevalence of alcohol consumption among older persons. J Community Health. 1990;15:239–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Screening for alcohol and other drug abuse. In: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989;277–86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Graham, K. Identifying and measuring alcohol abuse among the elderly: serious problem with existing instrumentation. J Stud Alcohol. 1986;47:322–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Welsh J, et al. Screening for drinking disorders in the elderly using the CAGE questionnaire. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:662–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984;252:1905–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Centor RM, et al. Screening for alcohol abuse using CAGE scores and likelihood ratios. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:774–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. King M. At risk drinking among general practice attendees: validation of the CAGE questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1986;16:213–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Selzer ML. The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 1971;127:1653–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibbs LE. Validity and reliability of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1983;12:279–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, et al. National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38:381–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Ed. Revised. Washington, DC: APA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, et al. Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine, 2nd Ed. Boston: Little Brown, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hsiao JK, Bartok JJ, Potter QZ. Diagnosing diagnoses: receiver operating characteristic methods and psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:664–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P. The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 1974;131:1121–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bush B, Shaw S, Cleary P, et al. Screening for alcoholism using the CAGE questionnaire. Am J Med. 1987;82:231–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yersin B, Trisconi Y, Paccaud F, et al. Accuracy of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: screening of alcoholism in patients of a medical department. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2071–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Willenbring ML, Christensen KJ, Spring WD, et al. Alcoholism screening in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987;35:864–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ross HE, Gavin DR, Skinner HA. Diagnostic validity of the MAST and the Alcohol Dependence Scale in the assessment of DSM-III alcohol disorders. J Stud Alcohol. 1990;51:506–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Babor TF, Stephens RS, Marlatt GA. Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its minimization. J Stud Alcohol. 1987;48:410–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Levine J. The relative value of consultation, questionnaires, and laboratory investigation in the identification of excessive alcohol consumption. Alcohol Alcohol. 1990;25:539–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Anthony JC, Folstein M, Romanoski AJ, et al. Comparison of the lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule and a standardized psychiatric diagnosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:667–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, T.V., Lindsey, B.A., Yount, P. et al. Alcoholism screening questionnaires. J Gen Intern Med 8, 674–678 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598284

Key words

Navigation