Skip to main content
Log in

Indomethacin modulation of load-related stimulation of new bone formationin vivo

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The capacity of bone to organize and reorganize its structure in response to changing mechanical demands is well recognized. However, the mechanism by which the changing mechanical environment is detected, and the means by which this information is translated into a stimulus for structural modification, are not understood. A group of substances suggested to be involved in the initial transduction of strain information are the prostaglandins. In this experiment we used a single period of dynamic loading to stimulate an adaptive osteogenic responsein vivo. Loading was performed in the presence and absence of indomethacin. Measurements of the periosteum 5 days after loading showed that the presence of indomethacin at the time of loading reduced the osteogenic response. Though consistent with the hypothesis that prostaglandins are involved in the initial transduction of tissue strain into a biochemical response, this result is not sufficient to demonstrate this conclusively because reduced prostaglandin levels during the 24 hours immediately after the period of loading may affect many other points in the cascade of events between strain transduction and adaptive new bone formation. Furthermore, indomethacin at the relatively high levels we used (40 mg/kg) may have effects other than those on prostaglandin synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1985) Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37:411–417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pead MJ, Lanyon LE (1988) Direct transformation from quiescence to bone formation in the adult periosteum following a single brief period of physical load bearing. J Bone Min Res 3:647–656

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. El Haj A, Pead MJ, Skerry TM, Suswillo R, Minter SL, Rawlinson SCF, Ali NN, Lanyon LE (1988) Early cellular responses in load-related adaptive bone remodelling. Proc Bone and Tooth Soc, Sept 1987 Bone 9:255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeh C-K, Rodan GR (1984) Tensile forces enhance prostaglandin E synthesis in osteoblastic cells grown on collagen ribbons. Calcif Tissue Int 36:S67-S71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Binderman I, Shimshoni Z, Somjen D (1984) Biochemical pathways involved in the translation of physical stimulus into biological message. Calcif Tissue Int 36:S82-S85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feyen JHM, Di Bon A, van der Plas A, Lowik CWGM, Nijweide PJ (1985) Effects of exogenous prostanoids on the proliferation of osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Prostaglandins 30:827–841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chambers TJ (1985) The pathobiology of the osteoclast. J Clin Pathol 38:241–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1984) Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg 66A:397–402

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ralis ZA, Ralis HM (1975) A simple method for demonstration of osteoid in paraffin sections. Laboratory Technology 32:203–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts WE, Mozsary PG, Klingler E (1982) Nuclear size as a marker for osteoblast differentiation. Am J Anat 165:373–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rozengurt E (1986) Early signals in the mitogenic response. Science 234:161–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Skerry T, Lanyon LE (1988) Change in proteoglycan orientation during loading: a possible mechanism for a strain memory in bone? J Orthop Res 6:547–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shen V, Rifas L, Kohler G, Peck WA (1986) Prostaglandins change cell shape and increase intercellular gap junctions in osteoblasts cultured from rat fetal calvaria. J Bone Min Res 1:243–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chyun YS, Raisz LG (1984) Stimulation of bone formation by prostaglandin E2. Prostagandins 27:97–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gera I, Hock JM, Gunness-Hey M, Fonseca J, Raisz LG (1987) Indomethacin does not inhibit the anabolic effect of parathyroid hormone on the long bones of rats. Calcif Tissue Int 40:206–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kantor HS, Hampton M (1978) Indomethacin in submicromolar concentrations inhibits cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. Nature 276:841–842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Curtis TA, Ashrafi SH, Weber DF (1985) Canalicular communication in the cortices of human long bones. Anat Rec 212:336–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jee WS, Ueno K, Kimmel DB, Woodbury DM, Price P, Woodbury LA (1987) The role of bone cells in increasing metaphyseal hard tissue in rapidly growing rats treated with prostaglandin E2. Bone 8:171–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pead, M.J., Lanyon, L.E. Indomethacin modulation of load-related stimulation of new bone formationin vivo . Calcif Tissue Int 45, 34–40 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556658

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556658

Key words

Navigation