Abstract
Mathematical biology has hitherto emphasized the quantitative, metric aspects of the physical manifestations of life, but has neglected the relational or positional aspects, which are of paramount importance in biology. Although, for example, the processes of locomotion, ingestion, and digestion in a human are much more complex than in a protozoan, the general relations between these processes are the same in all organisms. To a set of very complicated digestive functions of a higher animal there correspond a few simple functions in a protozoan. In other words, the more complicated processes in higher organisms can be mapped on the simpler corresponding processes in the lower ones. If any scientific study of this aspect of biology is to be possible at all, there must exist some regularity in such mappings. We are, therefore, led to the following principle: If the relations between various biological functions of an organism are represented geometrically in an appropriate topological space or by an appropriate topological complex, then the spaces or complexes representing different organisms must be obtainable by a proper transformation from one or very fewprimordial spaces or complexes.
The appropriate representation of the relations between the different biological functions of an organism appears to be a one-dimensional complex, or graph, which represents the “organization chart” of the organism. The problem then is to find a proper transformation which derives from this graph the graphs of all possible higher organisms. Both a primordial graph and a transformation are suggested and discussed. Theorems are derived which show that the basic principle of mapping and the transformation have a predictive value and are verifiable experimentally.
These considerations are extended to relations within animal and human societies and thus indicate the reason for the similarities between some aspects of societies and organisms.
It is finally suggested that the relation between physics and biology may lie on a different plane from the one hitherto considered. While physical phenomena are the manifestations of the metric properties of the four-dimensional universe, biological phenomena may perhaps reflect some local topological properties of that universe.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Blair, H. A. 1932a. “On the Intensity-Time Relations for Stimulation by Electric Currents: I.”Jour. Gen. Physiol.,15, 709–29.
— 1932b. “On the Intensity-Time Relations for Stimulation by Electric Currents: II.”,15, 731–55.
Buchsbaum, R. 1938.Animals without Backbones. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
— and R. W. Williamson. 1942. “The Rate of Elongation and Constriction of Dividing Sea-Urchin Eggs as a Test of a Mathematical Theory of Cell Division.”Physiol. Zool.,16, 162–71.
Cohn, David. 1953. “Optimal Systems: I. The Vascular System.”Bull Math. Biophysics,16, 59–74.
Culbertson, J. T. 1950.Consciousness and Behavior: A Neural Analysis of Behavior and Consciousness. Dubuque, Ia.: Wm. C. Brown Co.
Einstein, A. 1952.The Meaning of Relativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fuller, H. J. and O. Tippo. 1953.College Botany. New York: Henry Holt.
Haldane, J. B. S. 1924. “A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection I.”Trans. Comb. Phil. Soc.,23.
Harvey, E. N. and H. Shapiro. 1941. “The Recovery Period (Relaxation) of Marine Eggs after Deformation.”Jour. Cell. and Comp. Physiol.,17, 135–44.
Hearon, J. Z. 1949a. “The Steady State Kinetics of Some Biological Systems: I.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,11, 29–50.
— 1949b. “The Steady State Kinetics of Some Biological Systems: II.”,11, 83–95.
— 1950a. “The Steady State Kinetics of Some Biological Systems: III. Thermodynamic Aspects.”,12, 57–83.
— 1950b. “The Steady State Kinetics of Some Biological Systems: IV. Thermodynamic Aspects.”,12, 85–106.
— 1950c. “Some Cellular Diffusion Problems Based on Onsager's Generalization of Fick's Law.”,12, 135–59.
Hill, A. V. 1936. “Excitation and Accommodation in Nerve.”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B,119, 305–55.
Hogben, L. 1946.An Introduction to Mathematical Genetics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Householder, A. S. 1939. “A Neural Mechanism for Discrimination.”Psychometrika,4, 45–58.
— 1940. “A Neural Mechanism for Discrimination: II. Discrimination of Weights.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,2, 1–13.
Jacobson, E. 1930a. “Electrical Measurements of Neuromuscular States during Mental Activities. III. Visual Imagination and Recollection.”Am. Jour. Physiol.,95, 694–702.
— 1930b. “Electrical Measurements of Neuromuscular States during Mental Activities. IV. Evidence of Contraction of Specific Muscles during Imagination.”,95, 703–12.
— 1931. “Electrical Measurements of Neuromuscular States during Mental Activities. VII. Imagination, Recollection and Abstract Thinking Involving the Speech Musculature.”,97, 200–09.
Karreman, George. 1951. “Contributions to the Mathematical Biology of Excitation with Particular Emphasis on Changes in Membrane Permeability and on Threshold Phenomena.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,13, 189–243.
—. 1952. “Some Contributions to the Mathematical Biology of Blood Circulation. Reflections of Pressure Waves in the Arterial System.”,14, 327–50.
König, D. 1936.Theorie der Endlichen und Unendlichen Graphen. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
Landahl, H. D. 1938. “A Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination.”Psychometrika,3, 107–25.
— 1939. “A Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination: II.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,1, 159–76.
— 1941a. “Studies in the Mathematical Biophysics of Discrimination and Conditioning: I.”,3, 13–26.
— 1941b. “Studies in the Mathematical Biophysics of Discrimination and Conditioning: II. Special Case: Errors, Trials, and Number of Possible Responses.”,3, 71–77.
— 1941c. “Theory of the Distribution of Response Times in Nerve Fibers.”,3, 141–47.
— 1942a. “A Kinetic Theory of Diffusion Forces in Metabolizing Systems.”,4, 15–26.
— 1942b. “A Mathematical Analysis of Elongation and Constriction in Cell Division.”,4, 45–62.
— 1942c. “An Expression for the Rate of Return of an Egg after Artificial Deformation.”,4, 139–47.
— 1942d. “An Analysis of the Shapes of a Cell during Division with Particular Reference to the Role of Surface Tension.”,4, 151–54.
— 1942e. “Equilibrium Shapes in Non-Uniform Fields of Concentration.”,4, 155–58.
Lefschetz, S. 1930.Topology. New York: Am. Math. Society.
— 1949.Introduction to Topology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lewin, Kurt. 1936.Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
—. 1951,Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. (Ed. Dorwin Cartwright.) New York: Harper & Bros.
Lotka, A. J. 1922a. “Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,8, 147–51.
— 1922b. “Natural Selection as a Physical Principle.”,8, 151–54.
Luria, S. E. 1953.General Virology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Morales, M. and R. Smith. 1944. “On the Theory of Blood-Tissue Exchanges: III. Circulation and Inert-Gas Exchanges at the Lung with Special Reference to Saturation.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,6, 141–52.
— 1945a. “A Note on the Physiological Arrangement of Tissues.”,7, 47–51.
— 1945b. “The Physiological Factors which Govern Inert Gas Exchange.”,7, 99–106.
Neumann, J. von 1951. “The General and Logical Theory of Automata.”Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (Ed. Lloyd A. Jeffress.) New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Pitts, Walter and Warren S. McCulloch. 1947. “How We Know Universals: The Perception of Auditory and Visual Forms”Bull. Math. Biophysics,9, 127–47.
Pollard, E. 1953.The Physics of Viruses. New York: Academic Press.
Rapoport, A. 1948. “Cycle Distributions in Random Nets.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,10, 145–57.
Rashevsky, N. 1933. “The Theoretical Physics of the Cell as a Basis for a General Physicochemical Theory of Organic Form.”Protoplasma,20, 180.
— 1934. “Physico-Mathematical Aspects of the Gestalt Problem.”Phil. of Sci.,1, 409.
— 1938a.Mathematical Biophysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
— 1938b. “The Relation of Mathematical Biophysics to Experimental Biology.Acta Biotheoretica,4, 133–53.
— 1939. “The Mechanism of Cell Division.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,1, 23–30.
Rashevsky, N. 1943a. “Outline of a New Mathematical Approach to General Biology: I.”,5, 33–47.
— 1943b. “Outline of a New Mathematical Approach to General Biology: II.”,5, 49–64.
— 1943c. “On the Form of Plants and Animals.”,5, 69–73.
— 1944. “Studies in the Physicomathematical Theory of Organic Form.”,6, 1–59.
— 1948.Mathematical Biophysics. Rev. Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
— 1952. “Some Suggestions for a New Theory of Cell Division.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,14, 293–305.
— and V. Brown. 1944. “Contributions to the Mathematical Biophysics of Visual Aesthetics.”,6, 163–68.
Reidemeister, K. 1933.Einführung in die Kombinatorische Topologie. New York: F. Ungar.
Schmidt, George. 1953. “The Time Course of Capillary Exchange.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,15, 477–88.
Seifert, H. and W. Threlfall. 1934.Lehrbuch der Topologie. Leipzig and Berlin: B. G. Teubner.
Sheer, B. T. 1948.Comparative Physiology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Thompson, D.'Arcy W. 1917.On Growth and Form. Cambridge: At the University Press.
Wright, Sewall. 1931. “Evolution in Mendelian Populations.”Genetics,16, 97–159.
—. 1938a. “Size of Population and Breeding Structure in Relation to Evolution.”Science,87, 430–31.
—. 1938b. “The Distribution of Gene Frequencies under Irreversible Mutation.”Nat. Acad. Sci.,24, 253–59.
—. 1945. “The Differential Equation of the Gene Frequencies.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,31, 382–89.
—. 1950. “Genetical Structure of Populations.”Nature,166, 247.
—. 1951. “The Genetical Structure of Populations,”Ann. Eugenics,15, 323–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rashevsky, N. Topology and life: In search of general mathematical principles in biology and sociology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 16, 317–348 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484495
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484495