Skip to main content
Log in

Some possible theoretical implications of experiments on the chemical transfer of memory

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent experiments on so-called chemical transfer of memory may indicate at first glance that the possibility of transfer of the memory of a large number of reaction patterns in this manner requires the assumption of a correspondingly large number of specific chemical substances. It is shown that this is not necessarily the case. A mechanism is conceivable in which a single substance is responsible for “memory” transfer for a large number of distinct patterns. Mechanisms involving only about one hundred different specific substances could conceivably be responsible for chemical transfer of memory of some 1050 spatial patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Ewald, J. R. 1892.Physiology of the Nervous System (Physiologische Untersuchengen über das Endorgan des Nervus Octavus), Weisbaden, J. F. Bergman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjerdingstad, E. J., Th. Nissen and H. H. Røigaard-Petersen. 1965. “Effect of ribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from the brain of trained animals on learning in rats.”Scand. J. of Psych.,6(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Householder, Alton S. 1939. “Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Excitation.”Bull. Math. Biophys.,1(3), 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. “A Neural Mechanism for Discrimination III: Visually Perceived Lengths and Distances.” —Ibid.,2(4), 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landahl, Herbert D. 1938. “A Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Psychophysical Discrimination.”Psychometrika,3, 107–125.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, James V. 1965a. “Cannibals, Chemicals and Contiguity.”Anim. Behav.,13, 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1965b. “A Tape Recorder Theory of Memory.”Worm Runners' Digest,7(2), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1965c. “Effects of the Presence or Absence of Slime on Classical Conditioning in Planarians.”Amer. Zool.,5(4), 122 (abs.).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1938. “Contribution to the Mathematical Biophysics of Visual Perception with Special Reference to the Theory of Aesthetic Values of Geometrical Patterns.”Psychometrika,3, 253–271.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — 1950. “Some Bio-Sociological Aspects of the Mathematical Theory of Communication.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,12, 359–378.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1957. “Contributions to the Theory of Imitative Behavior.”Bull. Math. Biophys.,19, 91–119.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1959.Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior. Revised Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1966a. “Physics, Biology and Sociology: a Reappraisal.”Bull. Math. Biophys.,28, 283–308.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1966b. “A Sociological Approach to Biology.” —Ibid.,28, 655–661.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1967. “Organismic Sets: Outline of a General Theory of Biological and Social Organisms.” —Ibid.,29, 139–152.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — 1968. “Organismic Sets II.” —Ibid.,30, 163–174.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Frank. 1962.Principles of Neurodynamics. Sparta Books, Washington, D.C.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Frank. 1964. “A Model for Experimental Storage in Neural Networks.” InComputer and Information Sciences, Eds. J. Tou and R. Wilcox, pp. 16–66.

  • Rosenblatt, Frank. 1967. “Recent Work of Theoretical Models of Biological Memory.” InIbid. Computer and Information Sciences, Ed. J. Tou.

  • —, John T. Farrow and Samuel Rhine. 1966a. “The Transfer of Learned Behavior from Trained to Untrained Rats by Means of Brain Extracts I.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,55, 548–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1966b. “The Transfer of Learned Behavior from Trained to Untrained Rats by Means of Brain Extracts II.” —Ibid.,55, 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Rodman G. Miller. 1966c. “Behavioral Assay Procedures for Transfer of Learned Behavior by Brain Extracts I.” —Ibid.,56, 1423–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, G. and C. Oceguerro-Navarro. 1965. “Transfer of Habituation by Material Extracted from Brain.”Nature,207, 301–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rashevsky, N. Some possible theoretical implications of experiments on the chemical transfer of memory. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 30, 341–349 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476702

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476702

Keywords

Navigation