Abstract
There are three generic problems that arise in the use of the concept of equality as a principle of fairness. These problems concern (i) determining when equality is appropriate as opposed to some other principle, (ii) deciding how equality is to be operationalized, and (iii) determining how to implement equality. The proposal is made that these intrapersonal decision conflicts are mirrored by social conflicts when multiple interests are involved. This way of looking at social conflicts also suggests some novel ways to approach conflict resolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, S. T., McQueen, L. R., and Schaerfl, L. M. (1992). Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resources.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28: 23–42.
Allison, S. T., and Messick, D. M. (1990). Social decision heuristics and the use of shared resources.J. Behav. Decision Making 3: 195–204.
Bies, R. J., and Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Processual fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 199–218.
Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., and Neale, M. A. (1993). Procedural fairness and profit seeking: The perceived legitimacy of market exploitation.J. Behav. Decision Making 6: 243–256.
Coombs, C. H., and Avrunin, G. S. (1988).The Structure of Conflict, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Dawes, R. M. (1993). Affirmative action programs: Discontinuities between thoughts about individuals and thoughts about groups. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?.J. Soc. Issues 31 (3): 137–150.
Eckhoff, T. (1974)Justice: Its Determinants in Social Interaction, University Press, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elster, J. (1992).Local Justice, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Harris, R. J., and Joyce, M. A. (1980). What's fair? It depends on how you ask the question.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 165–170.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem.J. Polit. Econ. 98: 1325–1348.
Keller, R. L., and Sarin, R. K. (1988). Equity in social risk: Some empirical observations.Risk Anal. 1: 135–146.
Kirkman, B. L. Shapiro, D. L., Novelli, L., and Brett, J. M. (in press). Employee concerns regarding self-managing work teams: A multidimensional justice perspective.Soc. Justice Res.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
Manz, C. C., and Sims, H. P. (1993).Business Without Bosses: How Self-Managing Teams are Buildings High Performance Companies. Wiley, New York.
Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In Mellers, B. A., and Baron, J. (eds.),Psychological Perspectives on Justice, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 11–31.
Messick, D. M., and Rutte, C. G. (1992). The provision of public goods by experts: The Groningen study. In Liebrand, W., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. (eds.)Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon, London, pp. 101–109.
Messick, D. M., and Schell, T. (1992). Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision making.Acta Psychol. 80, 311–323.
Messick, D. M. & Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference and fairness biases (61–94). In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.)Equity Theory, Praeger, New York.
Moessinger, P. (1990). Perfect justice procedures.Soc. Justice Res. 4: 105–113.
Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Raiffa, H. (1982).The Art and Science of Negotiation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Russo, J. E., and Schoemaker, J. H. (1989).Decision Traps, Doubleday, New York.
Samuelson, C. D., and Allison, S. T. (in press). Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource sharing tasks.Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Processes.
Shklar, J. (1990).The Sense of Injustice, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Steinhaus, H. (1948). The problem of fair division.Econometrica 16: 101–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Messick, D.M. Equality, fairness, and social conflict. Soc Just Res 8, 153–173 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334689
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334689