Skip to main content
Log in

Results of aggressive treatment of gastric sarcoma

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoblastoma are subtypes of gastric smooth muscle tumors. These rare tumors are usually treated with surgical resection. However, there is controversy regarding the optimal surgical management for these malignancies and little information is available on the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy in the adjuvant or palliative setting.

Methods: The records of 32 patients with gastric leiomyosarcoma or leiomy-oblastoma were reviewed. Survival data were obtained and patient outcome was analyzed with respect to the type of treatment given. Four different staging systems were compared for their ability to predict survival.

Results: Thirty patients with leiomyosarcoma and two patients with leiomy-oblastoma were followed after surgery. All 32 patients were explored, and 21 curative and 11 palliative procedures were performed. Adjacent organs were included in 38% of resections. Only three patients did not undergo gastric resection. Local recurrence developed in eight patients after curative resection for a local control rate of 62%. Eight other patients developed metastatic disease for an overall recurrence rate of 76% after curative resection. Median survival of patients undergoing curative resection was 40 months compared with 8 months for those having a palliative procedure. The estimated 5-year survival was 34% and 10%, respectively (p=0.05). Twenty-five patients with advanced disease received systemic, hepatic arterial, or intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Eighty percent of patients received a regimen including doxorubicin. Four partial and one complete response were noted. Seven patients received postoperative radiation therapy. Fourteen patients underwent debulking surgery of recurrent or persistent disease in conjunction with chemotherapy. Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and debulking surgery did not result in statistically significant prolongation of survival. Seven patients remain alive, two with liver metastases. Four different staging systems for gastric sarcomas were compared, but none of them were found to be clearly superior in predicting survival.

Conclusions: Curative gastric resection was achieved in 66% of patients and resulted in a significant prolongation of survival as compared with patients who had a palliative procedure. Wedge resection of tumor or partial gastric resection appears to be an acceptable surgical approach to these tumors as long as negative margins can be obtained. Chemotherapy, radiation therapy and debulking surgery did not result in significant prolongation of survival in the face of advanced disease. None of the staging systems for gastric sarcoma currently in use is completely satisfactory. Tumor grade and extent of disease seem to be the most important factors when determining prognosis or considering adjuvant therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shiu MH, Farr GH, Papchristou DN, Hajdu SI. Myosarcomas of the stomach.Cancer 1983;49:177–87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grant CS, Kim CH, Farrugia G, Zinsmeister A, Goellner JR. Gastric leimoysarcoma.Arch Surg 1991;126:985–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dougherty MJ, Compton C, Talbert M, Wood WC. Sarcomas of the gastrointestinal tract.Ann Surg 1991;214:569–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell WO. A clinical and pathological staging system for soft tissue sarcomas.Cancer 1977;40:1562–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametic estimation from incomplete observations.J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables.J R State Soc 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giberson RG, Dockerty MB, Gray HK. Leimoysarcoma of the stomach. Clinocopathologic study of 40 cases.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1954;78:186–96.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bedikian AY, Khankhanian N, Valdivieso M, et al. Sarcoma of the stomach: clinicopathologic study of 43 cases.J Surg Oncol 1980;13:121–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Estes NC, Cherian G, Haller CC, et al. Advanced gastric leimoysarcoma.Am Surg 1989;55:353–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Welch JP. Smooth muscle tumors of the stomach.Am J Surg 1975;130:279–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. ReMine WH. Gastric sarcomas.Am J Surg 1979;120:320–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lindsay PC, Ordonex N, Raaf JH. Gastric leimoysarcoma: clinical and pathological review of fifty patients.J Surg Oncol 1981;18:399–421.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McGrath PC, Neifeld JP, Lawrence W, Kay S, Horsley JS, Parker GA. Gastrointestinal sarcomas analysis of prognostic factors.Am Surg 1987;206:706–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carson, W., Karakousis, C., Douglass, H. et al. Results of aggressive treatment of gastric sarcoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology 1, 244–251 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303530

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303530

Key Words

Navigation