Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in managed care activity in outpatient substance abuse treatment organizations, 1995–2000

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using nationally representative data from 1995 and 2000, this study examines trends in managed care penetration and activity among outpatient drug treatment organizations in the United States. Further, it investigates how managed care activity varies across different types of treatment providers and for public and private managed care programs. Overall, managed care activity has increased, with a greater proportion of units having managed care arrangements and a larger percentage of clients covered by managed care. In general, public managed care activity has increased and private managed care activity has decreased. Treatment providers report that they have fewer managed care arrangements, which may reflect consolidation in the managed behavioral care sector. Finally, growth in managed care among outpatient substance abuse treatment units affiliated with hospitals and mental health centers may signal a preference for providers that can effectively link substance abuse treatment with medical and social service provision, or, alternatively, that linkages with such organizations may provide the size necessary to assume the risks associated with managed care contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Open Minds.Yearbook of Managed Behavioral Health Market Share in the United States, 2000–2001. Gettysburg, Pa: Open Minds; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.State Profiles, 1999, on Public Sector Managed Behavioral Health Care. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000. DHHS Publication No. (SMA)00-3432.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Findlay S. Managed behavioral care in 1999: an industry at the crossroads.Health Affairs. 1999;18(5):116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sturm R. Managed care risk contracts and substance abuse treatment.Inquiry. 2000;37(2):219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander JA, Lemak CH. The effects of managed care on administrative burden in outpatient substance abuse treatment facilities.Medical Care. 1997;35(10):1060–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu X, Sturm R, Cuffel B. The impact of preauthorization on outpatient utilization in managed behavioral health plans.Medical Care Research and Review. 2000;57(2):182–195.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stein B, Orlando M, Sturm R. The effect of copayments on drug and alcohol treatment following inpatient detoxification under managed care.Psychiatric Services. 2000;51(2):195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sturm R. Cost and quality trends under managed care: is there a learning curve in behavioral health carve-out plans?Journal of Health Economics. 1999;18:593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Overview of the National Drug and Alcoholism Treatment Unit Survey (NDATUS): 1992 and 1980–1992. Rockville, Md: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1995. Advance Report Number 9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zarkin GA, Galinis DN, French MT, et al. Financing strategies for drug abuse treatment programs.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1995;12:385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Essock SM, Goldman HH. States embrace of managed mental health care.Health Affairs. 1995;14:34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garnick DW, Hendricks AM, Dulski JD, et al. Characteristics of private-sector managed care for mental health and substance abuse treatment.Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 1994;45:1201–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Price RH, Burke AC, D'Aunno TA, et al. Outpatient drug abuse treatment services, 1988: results of a national study. In: Pickens RW, Lukefeld CG, Schuster CR, eds.Improving Drug Abuse Treatment. Rockville, Md: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1991:63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heeringa SG.Outpatient Drug Abuse Treatment Studies: Technical Documentation. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research, Survey Design and Analysis Unit, University of Michigan; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adams TA, Heeringa SG.Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment System Surveys (OSATSS): Technical Documentation for OSATSS-5, 1999–2000. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research, Survey Design and Analysis Unit, University of Michigan; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE, et al, eds.Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hays WL.Statistics. 5th ed. Fort Worth, Tex: Harcourt Brace College Publishers; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garnick D, Horgan C, Hodgkin D, et al. Risk transfer and accountability in managed care organizations carve out contracts.Psychiatric Services. 2001;52(11):1502–1509.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sosin MR, D'Aunno TA. The organization of substance abuse managed care.Recent Developments in Alcoholism. 2001;15:27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lemak CH, Alexander JA. Managed care and outpatient substance abuse treatment intensity.Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2001;28(1):12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alexander JA, Nahra TA, Wheeler JR. Managed care and access to substance abuse treatment services.Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2003;30(2):161–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christy Harris Lemak PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lemak, C.H., Alexander, J.A. & Campbell, C.I. Changes in managed care activity in outpatient substance abuse treatment organizations, 1995–2000. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 30, 369–381 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287425

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287425

Keywords

Navigation