Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: A comparison of 3 transition models

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial simulation models were developed to predict temporal changes in land use patterns in a piedmont county in Georgia (USA). Five land use categories were included: urban, cropland, abandoned cropland, pasture, and forest. Land use data were obtained from historical aerial photography and digitized into a matrix based on a 1 ha grid cell format. Three different types of spatial simulation were compared: (1) random simulations based solely on transition probabilities; (2) spatial simulations in which the four nearest neighbors (adjacent cells only) influence transitions; and (3) spatial simulations in which the eight nearest neighbors (adjacent and diagonal cells) influence transitions. Models and data were compared using the mean number and size of patches, fractal dimension of patches, and amount of edge between land uses. The random model simulated a highly fragmented landscape having numerous, small patches with relatively complex shapes. The two versions of the spatial model simulated cropland well, but simulated patches of forest and abandoned cropland were fewer, larger, and more simple than those in the real landscape. Several possible modifications of model structure are proposed. The modeling approach presented here is a potentially general one for simulating human-influenced landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alig, R.J. 1986. Econometric analysis of the factors influencing forest acreage trends in the southeast. For. Sci. 32: 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G.W. and Burgess, R.L. 1981. A quantitative analysis of forest island pattern in selected Ohio landscapes. ORNL/TM-7759. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brender, E.V. 1974. Impact of past land use on the lower Piedmont forest. J. For. 72: 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R.L. and Sharpe, D.M. 1981. Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, B.O. 1973. Markov intertemporal land use simulation model. Southern J Ag Econ 5: 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. and Sklar, F.H. 1985. Articulation, accuracy, and effectiveness of mathematical models: a review of freshwater applications. Ecol. Mod. 27: 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debussche, D.M., Godron, M., Lepart, J. and Romane, F. 1977. An account of the use of a transition matrix. Agro-Ecosystems 3: 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66: 1762–1768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience 31: 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark, K.E. and Merriam, H.G. 1986. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biol. Conserv. 36: 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.H., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G. and O'Neill, R.V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landsc. Ecol. 1: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, F.G., Strebel, D.E., Goetz, S.J., Woods, K.D. and Botkin, D.B. Landscape pattern and successional dynamics in the boreal forest. Proc. Intl. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. Ann Arbor, Michigan. In press.

  • Healy, R.G. 1985. Competition for land in the American South. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M.T., Merriam, G. and Wegner, J. 1985. Patchy environments and species survival: chipmunks in an agricultural mosaic. Biol. Conserv. 31: 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hett, J. 1971. Land use changes in east Tennessee and a simulation model which describes these changes for 3 counties. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, ORNL-IBP-71-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.C. 1977. A mathematical model of forest succession and land use for the North Caroline Piedmont. Bull Torrey Bot. Soc. 104: 334–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.C. and Sharpe, D.M. 1976. An analysis of forest dynamics in the north Georgia piedmont. For. Sci. 22: 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, B.T. 1984. The Geography of Nitrogen in an Agricultural Watershed: A Technique for the Spatial Accounting of Nutrient Dynamics. Masters Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G. and O'Neill, R.V. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippe, E., de Smidt, J.T. and Glenn-Lewin, D.C. 1985. Markov models and succession: a test from a heathland in the Netherlands. J. Ecol. 73: 775–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B.B. 1977. Fractals, form, chance, and dimension. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B.B. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Appl. Math. Comp. In press.

  • Nelson, T.C. 1957. The original forests of the Georgia piedmont. Ecology 38: 390–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn, W.T. and Correll, D.L. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65: 1466–1475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser, P.G. 1987. Landscape Ecology: State-of-the-art.In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. pp. 3–14. Edited by M.G. Turner, Springer Verlag, New York. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1982. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, F.H. and Costanza, R. 1986. A spatial simulation of ecosystem succession in a Louisiana coastal landscape.In Proceedings of the 1986 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, The Society for Computer Simulation. pp. 467–472. Edited by R. Crosbie and P. Luker.

  • Sklar, F.H., Costanza, R. and Day, J.W. Jr. 1985. Dynamic spatial simulation modeling of coastal wetland habitat succession. Ecol. Mod. 29: 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, J.B. 1983. Forest Statistics for Georgia, 1982. USDA, Forest Service, Research Bull. SE-69.

  • Turner, M.G. 1987. Land use changes and net primary production in the Georgia, USA, landscape: 1935–82. Environ. Manage. 11: 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. (ed.) 1987. Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. Springer Verlag, New York. In press (a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. A spatial simulation model of land use changes in a piedmont county in Georgia. Appl. Math. Comp. In press (b).

  • Urban, D.L., O'Neill, R.V. and Shugart, H.H. 1987. Landscape ecology, a hierarchical perspective. BioScience 37: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA 1982. Census of Agriculture, Georgia. Washington, D.C.

  • Usher, M.B. 1981. Modelling ecological succession, with particular reference to Markovian models. Vegetatio 46: 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hulst, R. 1979. On the dynamics of vegetation: Markov chains as models of succession. Vegetatio 40: 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, F.C., Hairston, J.R., Musser, W.N., Perkins, H.F. and Reed, J.F. 1981. Relationship between increased crop acreage and nonpoint-source pollution: A Georgia case study. J. Soil Water Conserv. 36: 172–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., Crawford, C.S. and Gosz, J.R. 1985. Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45: 421–427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, M.G. Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: A comparison of 3 transition models. Landscape Ecol 1, 29–36 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02275263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02275263

Keywords

Navigation