Skip to main content
Log in

Parthenocarpic fruits in wild parsnip: Decoy defence against a specialist herbivore

  • Papers
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Parthenocarpy, the production of fruits without viable seeds, is a widespread phenomenon in plants. While failure to effect pollination or fertilization is often cited as the cause of parthenocarpy, this explanation alone is inadequate to explain why plants produce, maintain and further develop fruits. Wild parsnips (Pastinaca sativa) frequently produce parthenocarpic fruit. When parsnip webworms (Depressaria pastinacella), specialist feeders on wild parsnip, were given choices between normal fruit and parthenocarpic fruit, they exhibited a strong preference for parthenocarpic fruit. However, on parthenocarpic fruit, insects fed less efficiently and grew more slowly than insects fed normal fruit. Parthenocarpic fruits, then, may act as decoys that divert herbivores away from fruits that contain plant offspring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, S. E. (ed) (1974)Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, M. R. (1981) Patterns of furanocoumarin production and insect herbivory in a population of wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa L.).Oecologia 49, 236–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, M. R., Zangerl, A. R. and Lee, K. (1989) Chemical barriers to adaptation by a specialist herbivore.Oecologia 80, 501–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, M. R., Zangerl, A. R. and Nitao, J. K. (1984) Variation in seed furanocoumarin content within wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa).Phytochemistry 23, 1809–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, M. R., Zangerl, A. R. and Nitao, J. K. (1986) Constraints on chemical coevolution: wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm.Evolution 40, 1215–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, W. H. and Gooderham, C. B. (1916) An insect enemy of the parsnip.Can. Entom. 2, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1876)The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. 2nd Ed. D. Appleton and Co, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagri, K. and L. Van Der Pijl. (1979)The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger, P. (1978) Ecological interactions between plants and hummingbirds in a successional tropical community.Ecol. Monogr. 48, 269–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L. and White, J. (1974) The demography of plants.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 419–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, L. R., Bohart, G. E. and Toole, E. H. (1956) Carrot seed yield and germination as affected by different levels of insect pollination.Proc. Amer. Soc. Ag. Sci. 67, 384–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, S. D. (1979) Compensatory reproduction in a biennial herb following insect defoliation.Oecologia.42, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, R. W. (1974)The Moths of America North of Mexico: Gelechioidea Oecophoridea. Classey Ltd. and R.B.D. Publications Inc., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermy, T. (1984) Evolution of insect/plant relationships.Amer. Natur. 124, 609–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladygina, E. Y., Makarova, V. A. and Ignat'eva, N. S. (1970) Morphological and anatomical description ofPastinaca sativa fruit and localization of furanocoumarins in them.Farmatsyia (Moscow)19, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. D. H., Mendez, J. and Brown, S. A. (1982)The Natural Coumarins. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitao, J. K. and Zangerl, A. R. (1987) Floral development and chemical defense allocation in wild parsnip.Ecology 68, 521–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, P. W., Bouton, C. E., Gross, P., McPheron, B. A., Thompson, J. N. and Weis, A. E. (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, C. V. (1888) The parsnip webworm.Insect Life 1, 94–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, A. G. (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 253–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, A. G. and Bertin, R. I. (1983) Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. InPollination Biology (L. Real, ed.) pp. 110–49. Academic Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, E. L. (1890) Seedless fruits.Mem. Torr. Bot. Club 1, 141–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. N. (1977) Plant plasticity, phenology, and herbivore dispersion: wild parsnip and the parsnip webworm.Ecology 58, 1112–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M. F. and Burley, N. (1983)Mate Choice in Plants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangerl, A. R. and Berenbaum, M.R. (1990) Furanocoumarin induction in wild parsnip: Genetic and populational variation.Ecology (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zangerl, A.R., Berenbaum, M.R. & Nitao, J.K. Parthenocarpic fruits in wild parsnip: Decoy defence against a specialist herbivore. Evol Ecol 5, 136–145 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270830

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270830

Keywords

Navigation