Skip to main content
Log in

New rights for deaf patients; New responsibilities for mental hospitals

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an era in which mental hospital administrators are confronted by shrinking budgets and cost containment strategies in order to survive, the recently enacted Americans with Disabilities Act requires their special attention. This article addresses the anticipated effect of the ADA upon inpatient psychiatric facilities. We assume that adminstrators should anticipate increased ligation and settlement costs associated with specialized services to deaf and other qualifying patients who seek equal access to psychiatric services provided in mental hospitals. It is our view that adminsitrators can reduce the cost of implementing specialized services to deaf patient by developing a proactive plan of implementation. The authors analyze recent court consent decrees, and offer a three step plan for implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matthew, Jay, Landmark Law Failing to Achieve Workplace Goals,Washington Post. April 16, 1995. p. A-1.

  2. Neil Tugg v. Jim Towey et al., No. 94-1063, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, July 19, 1994; reported in 5 National Disability Law Reporter, Sec. 311, pp. 999–1005.

  3. Katz, D., Vernon, M., Penn, A., and Gillece, J. The consent degree: A means of obtaining mental health services for people who are deaf. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association, 26, #2, 1992. pp. 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nancy Doe v. Charles Buck, Case #N-82-2409 (d. Md.)

  5. Vernon, M. & Andrews, J. F. The Psychology of Deafness: Understanding Deaf and Hard of Hearing People. 1990. New York. Longman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charmatz, M. (1986). A summary of Federal court decision involving hearing impaired people. Gallaudet Today, 16, #4, pp. 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubow, S. & Greer S. (1992). Legal Rights: The Guide for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People. Washington, D.C. Gallaudet University Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCrone, W. P. A two year report card on Title I on the Americans with Disabilities Act: Implications for rehabilitation counseling with deaf people. Journal of the Adult Deafness and Rehabilitation Association, 28, #2. 1994. pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anon (1993) Maryland School for the Deaf Bilingual Educational Policy Statement. Frederick, Maryland; Maryland School for the Deaf.

  10. Schein, J. D. and Delk, M. T. Jr. (1974) The Deaf Population in the United States. Silver Spring, Maryland: National Association of the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1982) Hearing Ability of Persons by Sociodemographic and Health Characteristics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeter, I. K. (1976) Unidentified Hearing Impairment among Psychiatric Patients. ASHA, 18, pp. 843–845.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lamb, L. E. and Graham J. T. (1962) Audimetric Screening in a Psychiatric Hospital. Audiological Research, 2, pp. 338–349.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCoy, D. F. and Plotkin, W. H. (1967) Audiometric Screening of a Psychiatric Population in a Large State Hospital. Journal of Auditory Research, 7, pp. 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubin, P. N. (1993) The Americans with Disabilities Act and Criminal Justice: An Overview. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins, P. C. (1983) Outsiders in a Hearing World. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  17. U.S. District Court Consent Order, 91-3045, Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez, inP.T. et al. v. Gibbs et al., page 4.

  18. Gardner, E. The legal rights of inmates with physical disabilities. St. Louis University Public Law Review, Vol. 14, Number 1, 1994. pp. 175–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raifman, L.J., Vernon, M. New rights for deaf patients; New responsibilities for mental hospitals. Psych Quart 67, 209–220 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238952

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238952

Keywords

Navigation