Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence analysis of gradient descent stochastic algorithms

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proves convergence of a sample-path based stochastic gradient-descent algorithm for optimizing expected-value performance measures in discrete event systems. The algorithm uses increasing precision at successive iterations, and it moves against the direction of a generalized gradient of the computed sample performance function. Two convergence results are established: one, for the case where the expected-value function is continuously differentiable; and the other, when that function is nondifferentiable but the sample performance functions are convex. The proofs are based on a version of the uniform law of large numbers which is provable for many discrete event systems where infinitesimal perturbation analysis is known to be strongly consistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho, Y. C., andCao X. R.,Perturbation Analysis of Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rubinstein, R. Y., andShapiro, A.,Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro, A., andWardi, Y.,Nondifferentiability of the Steady-State Function in Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 39, pp. 1707–1711, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, F. H.,Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rockefellar, R. T.,Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson, S. M.,Convergence of Subdifferentials under Strong Stochastic Convexity, Management Science (to appear).

  7. Shapiro, A., andWardi, Y.,Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Algorithms, Mathematics of Operations Research (to appear).

  8. Correa, R., andLemaréchal, C.,Convergence of Some Algorithms for Convex Minimization, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 62, pp. 261–275, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Demyanov, V. F., andVasilev, L. V.,Nondifferentiable Optimization, Optimization Software, Publications Division, New York, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fu, M. C.,Optimization via Simulation: A Review, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 53, pp. 199–247, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chong, E. K. P., andRamadge, P. J.,Optimization of Queues Using Infinitessimal Perturbation Analysis-Based Stochastic Algorithm with General Update Times, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol 31, pp. 698–732, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L'ecuyer, P., andGlynn, P.,Stochastic Optimization by Simulation: Convergence Proofs for the GI/G1 Queue in Steady State, Management Science, Vol. 40, pp. 1562–1578, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chong, E. K. P., andRamadge, P. J.,Stochastic Optimization of Regenerative Systems Using Infinitestimal Perturbation Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 39, pp. 1400–1410, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shantikumar, J. G., andYao, D. D.,Second-Order Stochastic Properties of Queuering Systems, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 77, pp. 162–170, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bartusek, J. D., andMarkowski, A. M.,On Stochastic Approximations Driven by Sample Averages: Convergence Results via the ODE Method, Manuscript, Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, 1993.

  16. Dupuis, P., andSimha, R.,On Sampling Controlled Stochastic Approximation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 36, pp. 915–924, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meheshwari, S., andMukai, H.,An Optimization Algorithm Driven by Probabilistic Simulation, Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Control, Athens, Greece, pp. 1703–1705, 1986.

  18. Yan, D., andMukai, H.,An Optimization Algorithm with Probabilistic Simulation, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 79, pp. 345–371, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wardi, Y.,Stochastic Algorithms with Armijo Stepsizes for Minimization of functions, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 64, pp. 399–417, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hiriart-Urruty, J. B., andLemaréchal, C.,Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms, Part 1, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hiriart-Urruty, J. B., andLemaréchal, C.,Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms, Part 2, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro, A.,Asymptotic Properties of Statistical Estimators in Stochastic Programming, Annals of Statistics, Vol. 17, pp. 841–858, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wardi, Y.,Interchangeability of Expectation and Differentiation of Waiting Times in GI/G1 Queues, Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, Vol. 45, pp. 141–154, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Glasserman, P.,Gradient Estimation via Perturbation Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Asmussen, S.,Applied Probability and Queues, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by W. B. Gong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, A., Wardi, Y. Convergence analysis of gradient descent stochastic algorithms. J Optim Theory Appl 91, 439–454 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190104

Key Words

Navigation