Abstract
This study forms part of a larger research project examining the election process for the Nobel prizes for Physiology or Medicine at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, and the role and function of the prizes in early 20th century Swedish and international medicine. The purpose of the study is to clarify the decision-making process which led to the Nobel prize for Paul Ehrlich in 1908, ‘for work on immunity’. His award was preceded by the most dramatic conflict within the prize authority concerning any prizewinner prior to World War I, and thus is apt to illuminate both the implicit and explicit criteria and the strategies used in the prize deliberations.
Ehrlich's chemical ideas on the immune response were criticized by the physical chemist Svante Arrhenius who recommended the application of his disciplines's methods and principles on immunological problems. This criticisms were brought into the Nobel prize debate by J.E. Johansson, a physiologist who asserted that Ehrlich's research was of little scientific value and therefore not worthy of a prize. Yet the majority of the Institute, led by its chairmam, the chemist K.A.H. Mörner, succeeded in awarding Ehrlich.
An analysis of the controversy shows it to be primarily based upon (1) a difference of scientific styles between the antagonists, resulting in incongruous definitions of immunology as a research field, and of the proper aims and methods of immunological studies. Other factors influencing the final decision were (2) the Institute's negative reaction to what was considered an intrusion in medical Nobel prize matters by a chemist, (3) Arrhenius' and Johansson's diverging views on what kind of work should be awarded a prize, and (4) Johansson's position as a non-conformist at the Karolinska.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grmek MD, Cohen RS, Cimino G, eds.On Scientific Discovery. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981.
Nickles T, ed.Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980.
Simon HA.Models of Discovery. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977.
Merton RK. Priorities in scientific discovery. In: Storer NW, ed.The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973: 286–324.
Rubin LP. Styles in scientific explanation: Paul Ehrlich and Svante Arrhenius on immunochemistry.J Hist Med Allied Sci 1980; 35:397–425.
Holton GJ.Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Woolf H, ed.Science as a Cultural Force. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1964.
Nobel Foundation, ed.Nobel: The Man and his Prizes. 3rd revised ed. New York: Elsevier, 1972.
Sohlman R.The Legacy of Alfred Nobel: The Story Behind the Nobel Prizes. London: The Bodley Head, 1983.
Crawford E.The Beginnings of the Nobel Institution. The Science Prizes, 1901–1915. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Crawford E. Arrhenius, the atomic hypothesis, and the 1908 Nobel prizes in physics and chemistry.Isis 1984; 75:503–22.
Friedman RM. Nobel Physics Prize in perspective.Nature 1981; 292:793–8.
Friedman RM. Text, context and quicksand: method and understanding in studying the Nobel Science prizes.Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 1989; 20:63–77.
Zuckerman H.Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: The Free Press, 1977.
Bernhard CG, Crawford E, Sörbom P, eds.Science, Technology and Society in the Time of Alfred Nobel. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982.
Protokoll hållna vid sammanträden för överläggning om Alfred Nobels testamente. Stockholm: Norstedt, 1899.
Crawford E. The secrecy of Nobel Prize selections in the sciences and its effects on documentation and research.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1990; 134:408–19.
Salomon-Bayet C, Lécuyer B, Léonard J, et al.Pasteur et la Révolution Pastorienne. Paris: Payot, 1986.
Salomon-Bayet C. Bacteriology and Nobel prize selections, 1901–20. In: Bernhard CG, Crawford E, Sörbom P, eds.Science, Technology and Society in the Time of Alfred Nobel. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982:377–400.
Foster WD.A History of Medical Bacteriology and Immunology. London: Heinemann, 1970.
Fruton JS.Molecules and Life: Historical Essays on the Interplay of Chemistry and Biology. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1972.
Kohler RE.From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Fruton JS. The emergence of biochemistry.Science 1976; 192:327–34.
Fruton JS. The interplay of chemistry and biology at the turn of the century. In: Bernhard CG, Crawford E, Sörbom P. eds.Science, Technology and Society in the Time of Alfred Nobel. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982:74–96.
Dolman CE. Ehrlich, Paul.Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Vol 4. New York: Scribner's Sons, 1971:295–305.
Ehrlich P.The Collected Papers of Paul Ehrlich. [Himmelweit F, ed]. Vols 1–3. London and New York: Pergamon Press, 1956–60.
Marquardt M.Paul Ehrlich. London: Heinemann, 1949.
Liebenau J. Paul Ehrlich as a commercial scientist and research administrator.Med Hist 1990; 34:65–78.
Lundgren A. Arrhenius om vant't Hoff och Ehrlich. Två brev från Ernst Riesenfeld. In:Lychnos. Lärdomshistoriska Samfundets Årsbok 1975–76. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1977:85–100.
Mazumdar PMH. The antigen-antibody reaction and the physics and chemistry of life.Bull Hist Med 1974; 48:1–21.
Parascandola J, Jasensky R. Origins of the receptor theory of drug action.Bull Hist Med 1974; 48:199–220.
Parascandola J. The theoretical basis of Paul Ehrlich's chemotherapy.J Hist Med Allied Sci 1981; 36:19–41.
Lesky E.Die Wiener medizinische Schule im 19. Jahrhundert. 2nd ed. Graz-Cologne: Böhlau, 1965.
Weindling P.Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Partington JR.A History of Chemistry. Vol 4. London: Macmillan, 1964.
Snelders HAM. Svante Arrhenius.Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Vol 1. New York: Scribner's Sons, 1970:296–302.
Riesenfeld EH.Svante Arrhenius. Leipzig: Akad Verlagsgesellschaft, 1931.
Arrhenius S.Immunochemistry. The Application of the Principles of Physical Chemistry to the Study of the Biological Antibodies. New York: Macmillan, 1907.
Proceedings of the German Bunsen-Gesellschaft.Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie 1904; 10:649–79.
Travis A. Science as receptor of technology: Paul Ehrlich and the synthetic dyestuffs industry.Science in Context 1989; 3:383–408.
Arrhenius S.Aus meiner Jugendzeit. Leipzig: Akad Verlagsgesellschaft, 1913.
Servos JW.Physical Chemistry from Ostwald to Pauling. The Making of a Science in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
Arrhenius S.Quantitative Laws in Biological Chemistry. London: Bell & Sons, 1915.
Ehrlich P.Studies in Immunity. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1910.
Liljestrand G. Johan Erik Johansson. In:Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademien: Levnadsteckningar. Vol 8. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1954:539–66.
Theorell H. KAH Mörner. In:Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens årsbok. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1968:181–9.
Paul H.The Sorcerer's Apprentice: The French Scientists' Image of German Science, 1840–1919. Gainsville: University of Florida Press, 1972.
Ackerknecht EH.A Short History of Medicine. Revised ed. New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1968.
Tauber AI, Chemyak L.Metchnikoff and the Origins of Immunology. From Metaphor to Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Löwy I. Immunology and literature in the early twentieth century:Arrowsmith andThe Doctor's Dilemma.Med Hist 1988; 32:314–32.
Mörner KAH. Presentation speech of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1908, to Elie Metchnikoff and Paul Ehrlich. In: Nobel Foundation.Nobel Lectures: Physiology or Medicine. Vol 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1967:277–80.
Loeb J.The Mechanistic Conception of Life. [1912]. Reprinted ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.
Pauly PJ.Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
Karolinska Mediko-Kirurgiska Institutets Historia 1910–1960. Vols 1–4. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1960.
Crawford E. The benefits of the Nobel prizes. In: Frängsmyr T, ed.The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 1739–1989. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1989: 227–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luttenberger, F. Arrhenius vs. Ehrlich on immunochemistry: Decisions about scientific progress in the context of the Nobel prize. Theor Med Bioeth 13, 137–173 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02163626
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02163626