Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Industrial back belts and low back pain: Mechanisms and outcomes

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent increased utilization of industrial back belts as personal protective equipment in the workplace has generated considerable controversy among occupational health and safety professionals in the United States. The purpose of this article is to review the literature regarding proposed mechanisms of action of these devices and studies related to outcome of belt utilization in the prevention of low back pain and disability in the workplace. At the present time, neither the suspected mechanisms of action nor the efficacy of these devices in the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of work-related low back pain has been adequately demonstrated in clinical trials. As a result, generally accepted guidelines regarding the safe use of belts in the occupational setting have not been established. Based on this review it is recommended that further well-controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of these devices as personal protective equipment. During the interim, the decision to prescribe belts to employees in the workplace should be at the discretion of an adequately trained occupational health care provider. These devices should not be provided as an alternative to appropriate administrative and/or engineering controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snook SH. The cost of back pain in industry.Spine: State Art Rev 1987; 2: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vlok GJ, Hendrix MR. The lumbar disc: Evaluating the causes of pain.Orthopedics 1991; 14: 419–425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk.Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 598–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Quebec Task Force On Spinal Disorders. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders.Spine 1987; 12 (Suppl. 1): s1-s59.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rowe ML.Backache at work. Fairport, NY: Perington Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Costanza MC. Epidemiologic studies of low-back pain.Spine 1980; 5: 419–423.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaffin DB, Anderson GBJ.Occupational biomechanical models. Philadelphia: Wiley Interscience, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pope MH, Andersson GBJ, Frymoyer JW.Occupational low-back pain: Assessment, treatment and prevention. St. Louis, Mosby-Year Book, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ortengren R, Andersson GBJ, Nachemson AL. Studies of relationships between lumbar disc pressure, myoelectric back muscle activity and intra-abdominal (intragastric) pressure.Spine 1981; 6: 98–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaffin DB, Moulis EJ. An empirical investigation of low-back strains and vertebrae geometry.J Biomech 1969; 2: 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garg A, Moore JS. Epidemiology.Occupational Med: State Art Rev 1992; 17: 593–608.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bergenudd H, Nilsson B. Back pain in middle age: Occupational work load and psychologic factors: An epidemiologic survey.Spine 1988; 13: 58–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bigos SJ, Spengler DM, Martin NA. Back injuries in industry; a retrospective study II. Injury factors.Spine 1986; 11: 246–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Svensson HO, Andersson GBJ, Lloyd DCEF. Low-back pain in 40-to 47-year-old men: Work history and work environment factors.Spine 1983; 8: 272–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bigos SJ, Spengler DM, Martin NA. Back injuries in industry; a retrospective study III. Employee-related factors.Spine 1986; 11: 252–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anonymous. Back support-use spreads, but do the devices work?Ergodyne Report 1994; 1: 1–5.

  17. Anonymous. Value of back belts in doubt but popularity high among workers.BNA's Workers' Comp Rep 1993; 4: 484.

  18. Sandler HM. Musculoskeletal support devices: Panacea, placebo or pathogen?Occup Hazards 1993; 37–38.

  19. McGill SM. Abdominal belts in industry: A position paper on their assets, liabilities and use.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1993; 154: 752–754.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perry GF. Occupational Medicine Forum. Lumbar Support Belts.JOM 1992; 34: 679–680.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bartelink DL. The role of abdominal pressure in relieving the pressure on the lumbar intervertebral discs.J Bone Jt Surg 1957; 39B: 718–725.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davis PR. Posture of the trunk during the lifting of weights.Br Med J 1959; Jan: 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davis PR. The use of intra-abdominal pressure in evaluating stresses on the lumbar spine.Spine 1981; 6: 90–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grew ND. Intra-abdominal pressure response to loads applied to the torso in normal subjects.Spine 1980; 5: 149–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomson KD. On the bending movement capability of the pressurized abdominal cavity during human lifting activities.Ergonomics 1988; 31: 817–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chaffin DB. Functional assessment for heavy physical labor. In: Alderman MH, Hanley MJ, eds.Clinical medicine for the occupational physician. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson CK, Chaffin DB, Herrin GD. A biomechanical model of the lumbosacral joint during lifting activities.J Biomech 1985; 18: 571–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fairbank JCT, O'Brien JP, Davis PR. Intra-abdominal pressure and low-back pain.Proc Int Soc Study Lumbar Spine 1980.

  29. Hemborg B, Moritz U, Hamberg J, Lowing H, Akesson I. Intra-abdominal pressure and trunk muscle activity during lifting—effect of abdominal muscle training in healthy subjects.Scand J Rehab Med 1983; 15: 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Legg SJ. The effect of abdominal muscle fatigue and training on the intra-abdominal pressure developed during lifting.Ergonomics 1981; 24: 191–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nachemson A, Schultz A, Andersson G. Mechanical effectiveness studies of lumbar spine orthoses.Scan J Rehab Med (Suppl) 1983; 9: 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McGill S, Norman RW, Sharratt MT. The effect of an abdominal belt on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure during squat lifts.Ergonomics 1990; 33: 147–160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lander JE, Hundley JR, Simonton RL. The effectiveness of weight-belts during multiple repetitions of the squat exercise.Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 603–609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lander JE, Simonton RL, Giacobbe JKF. The effectiveness of weight-belts during the squat exercise.Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 117–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harman EA, Rosenstein RM, Frykman PN, Nigro GA. Effects of a belt on intra-abdominal pressure during weight lifting.Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: 186–190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hemborg B, Moritz U, Lowing H. Intra-abdominal pressure and trunk muscle activity during lifting. IV: The causal factors of the Intra-abdominal pressure rise.Scand J Rehab Med 1985; 17: 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nachemson AL, Andersson GBJ, Schultz AB. Valsalva Maneuver Biomechanics. Effects on lumbar trunk loads of elevated intra-abdominal pressures.Spine 1986; 11: 476–479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Morris JM, Lucas DB. Physiological considerations in bracing of the spine.Orthop Prosth Appl 1963; 37–44.

  39. Waters RL, Morris JM. Effects of spinal supports on the electrical activity of muscles of the trunk.J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52A: 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nachemson A, Schultz A, Andersson G. Mechanical effectiveness studies of lumbar spine orthoses.Scan J Rehab Med (Suppl) 1983; 9: 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lantz SA, Schultz AB. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. II. Effect on trunk muscle myoelectric activity.Spine 1986; 11: 838–842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Holmstrom E, Moritz U. Effects of lumbar belts on trunk muscle strength and endurance: A follow-up study of construction workers.J Spinal Disord 1992; 5: 260–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Norton PL, Brown T. The immobilizing efficiency of the back braces; their effect on the posture and motion of the lumbo-sacral spine.J Bone Joint Surg 1957; 39A: 111–139.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lumsden RM, Morris JM. Anin vivo study of axial rotation and immobilization of the lumbosacral joint.J Bone Joint Surg 1968; 50A: 1591–1602.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lantz SA, Schultz AB. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. I. Restriction of gross body motions.Spine 1986; 11: 834–837.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McGill SM, Sequin JP, Bennett G. Passive Stiffness of the Lumbar Torso in Flexion, Extension, Lateral Bend and Axial Twist: The Effect of Belt Wearing and Breath Holding. SM McGill, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.

  47. Marras WS, Lavender SA, Leurgans SE, Rajulu SL, Allread WG, Fathallah FA, Ferguson SA. The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders.Spine 1993; 18: 617–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ahlgren SA, Hansen T. The use of lumbosacral corsets prescribed for low back pain.Prosteth Orthop Int 1978; 2: 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Alaranta H, Hurri H. Compliance and subjective relief by corset treatment in chronic low back pain.Scand J Rehab Med 1988; 20: 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bugge PM, Biering-Sorensen F. Lumbal korset behandling.Ugeskr Laeger 1987; 149: 577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Walsh NE, Schwartz RK. The influence of prophylactic orthoses on abdominal strength and low back injury in the workplace.Am J Phys Med Rehab 1990; 69: 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reddell CR, Congleton JJ, Huchinson RD, Montgomery JF. An evaluation of a weightlifting belt and back injury prevention training class for airline baggage handlers.Appl Ergon 1992; 23: 319–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Anderson CK, Morris TL, Del Vechio DC.The effectiveness of using a lumbar support belt. Dallas, Texas: Advanced Ergonomics, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mitchell LV, Lawler FH, Bowen D, Mote W, Asundi P, Purswell J. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of employer-issued back belts in areas of high risk for back injury.J Occup Med 1994; 36: 90–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain.Orthop Clin North Am 1991; 22: 263–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wood DJ. Designs and evaluation of a back injury prevention program within a geriatric hospital.Spine 1987; 12: 77–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Feldstein A, Valanis B, Vollmer W, Stevens N, Overton C. The back injury prevention project pilot study. Assessing the effectiveness of back attack, an injury prevention program among nurses, aides, and orderlies.JOM 1993; 35: 114–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Snook SH, Campanelli RA, Hart JW. A study of three preventive approaches to low back injury.J Occup Med 1978; 20: 478–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (August 1993). NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation Report: Big Bear Grocery Warehouse. Department of Health and Human Services (HETA 91-405-2340).

  60. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (November, 1992). A National Strategy for Occupational Musculoskeletal Injuries: Implementation Issues and Research Needs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Pub. No. 93-101).

  61. Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation and management of work disability.J Occup Rehab 1991; 1: 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, USA

    Bruce A. Barron M.D. (Consultant in Occupational Medicine)

  2. Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Center for Occupational Rehabilitation, USA

    Bruce A. Barron M.D. (Consultant in Occupational Medicine)

  3. Departments of Psychiatry and Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, USA

    Michael Feuerstein (Director)

  4. Division of Behavioral and Psychosocial Medicine, Center for Occupational Rehabilitation, USA

    Michael Feuerstein (Director)

Authors
  1. Bruce A. Barron M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Feuerstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barron, B.A., Feuerstein, M. Industrial back belts and low back pain: Mechanisms and outcomes. J Occup Rehab 4, 125–139 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109969

Key words

Search

Navigation