Skip to main content
Log in

A simple tree lemma and its application to a counterexample of philips

  • Published:
Archiv für mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove a tree lemma on perfect trees to obtain an ultrafilter of definable subsets of ℕ, which is Ramsey but not conservative (see [Phi 2]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blass, A.: On certain types and models of arithmetic. JSL39, 151–162 (....).

  2. Phillips, R. G.: Omitting types in arithmetic and conservative extensions. Proc. of the Victoria Symp. on Non Standard Analysis, Lect. Notes in Math. Nr., pp. 195–202. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1974.

  3. Phillips, R. G.: A minimal extension that is not conservative. Mich. Math. J. vol.21, 27–32 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potthoff, K. A simple tree lemma and its application to a counterexample of philips. Arch math Logik 18, 67–71 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02007258

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02007258

Keywords

Navigation