Skip to main content
Log in

Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: Continued value of the barium enema

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six patients in whom errors of diagnosis and therapy occurred because of reliance on colonoscopic tumor localization are presented. Three of the patients required a second laparotomy for surgical resection of a tumor that was missed at the first exploration. While endoscopy is regarded as the diagnostic gold standard, there are problems in its use for colonoscopic localization. Reliance on distance measurements may be misleading. Anatomical variants can be confusing. For this reason, a preoperative barium enema for precise delineation and localization of tumors is recommended. When a barium enema is not feasible, such as when a malignant polyp has been removed endoscopically, preoperative endoscopic localization with injection of India ink or intraoperative colonoscopy must be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Wu WC, et al.: Sensitivity of double contrast barium enema: emphasis on polyp detection.AJR 135:327–330, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams CU, Macrae FA, Bartram CL: A prospective study of diagnostic methods in adenoma follow up.Endoscopy 14:74–78, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fork FT: Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.Gut 22:971–977, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  4. Waye JD, Braunfeld S: Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy.Endoscopy 14:79–81, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbertsen VA, Williams SE, Schuman L, McHugh R: Colonoscopy in the detection of carcinoma of the intestine.Surg Gynecol Obstet 149:877–878, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller RE, Lehman G: Polypoid colonic lesions undetected by endoscopy.Radiology 129:295–297, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  7. Evers K, Laufer I, Gordon RL, Kressel HY, Herlinger H, Gohel VK: Double contrast enema examination for detection of rectal carcinoma.Radiology 140:635–639, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrands PA, Vellacott KD, Amar SS, et al.: Flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema examination in the identification of adenomas and carcinoma of the colon.Dis Colon Rectum 26:727–729, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richter RM, Littman L, Levowitz BS: Intraoperative fiberoptic colonoscopy.Arch Surg 106:228, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  10. Waye JD: Colonoscopy. In Berk JE (ed):Bockus Gastroenterology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders 1985, pp 588–600

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cotton PB, Williams CB:Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. London: Blackwell, 1980, pp 96–101

    Google Scholar 

  12. Espiner HJ, Salmon PR, Teague RH, et al.: Operative colonoscopy.Br Med J 1:453–454, 1973

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frager, D.H., Frager, J.D., Wolf, E.L. et al. Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: Continued value of the barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 12, 343–346 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01885178

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01885178

Key words

Navigation