Abstract
This study looks beyond gender to explore the impact of the social status of race and of token difference defined by race. In a 2 × 4 design, 53 African American women and 76 white women undergraduates rated a woman target, of the same race as themselves, who was described as being of the same race and gender as the dominant members of her work group or as a token defined by her gender alone, race alone, or both her race and gender. White women tokens were perceived to experience better social relations, more supportive colleagues, and lower stress than African American targets. Across African American and white raters/targets, token representation, defined by any ascribed status, was associated with expected negative tokenism outcomes relative to those projected for dominants. The omnirelevance of race toward understanding tokenism processes is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azibo, D. (1988). Understanding the proper and improper usage of the comparative research framework.Journal of Black Psychology, 15, 81–91.
Benokraitis, N., & Feagin, J. (1986).Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Berger, J., Fisek, H. M., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977).Status characteristics in social interaction: An expectation status approach. New York: Elsevier.
Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought.Social Problems, 33, 14–32.
Dill, B. T. (1979). The dialectics of Black womanhood.Signs, 4, 543–555.
Fairhurst, G., & Snavely, B. K. (1983). A test of the social isolation of male tokens.Academy of Management Journal, 26, 353–61.
Farley, R., Schuman, H., Bianchi, S., Colasanto, D., & Hatchett, S. (1978). “Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs”: Will the trend toward racially separate communities continue?Social Science Research, 7, 319–344.
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991).Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Floge, L., & Merrill, D. (1985). Tokenism reconsidered: Male nurses and female physicians in a hospital setting.Social Forces, 64, 925–47.
Fottler, M. P. (1976). Attitudes of female nurses toward the male nurses: A study of occupational segregation.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 17, 98–110.
Grimm, J., & Stern, R. (1974). Sex roles and internal labor market structures: The “female” semi-professions.Social Problems, 21, 690–705.
Higginbotham, E. B. (1992). African-American women's history and the metalanguage of race.Signs, 17, 251–274.
Johnson, R. A., & Schulman, G. I. (1989). Gender role composition and role entrapment in decision-making groups.Gender & Society, 3, 355–372.
Kadushin, A. (1976). Men in a woman's profession.Social Work, 21, 440–47.
Kanter, R. M. (1977a).Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic.
Kanter, R. M. (1977b). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women.American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–90.
Martin, S. E. (1994). “Outsider within” the station house: The impact of race and gender on Black women police.Social Problems, 41, 383–400.
McIntosh, P. (1992). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women's studies. In M. Andersen & P. H. Collins (Eds.),Race, class, and gender: An anthology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Morrison, A. M. & von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management.American Psychologist, 45, 200–208.
Nkomo, S. M., & Cox, T., Jr. (1989). Gender differences in the upward mobility of Black managers: Double whammy or double advantage?Sex Roles, 21, 825–839.
Olson, J. E., Frieze, I. H., & Detlefsen, E. G. (1990). Having it all?: Combining work and family in a male and female profession.Sex Roles, 23, 515–533.
Ott, E. M. (1989). Effects of the male-female ratio at work: Policewomen and male nurses.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 41–58.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1975). The racial integration of the schools. In T. F. Pettigrew (Ed.),Racial discrimination in the United States. New York: Harper.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion.Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41–78.
Reid, P. T. (1988). Racism and sexism: Comparison and conflicts. In P. A. Katz & D. A Taylor (Eds.),Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy. New York: Plenum.
Roman, L. G. (1993). White is a color! White defensiveness, postmodernism, and anti-racist pedagogy. In C. McCarthy & W. Crichlow (Eds.),Race identity and representation in education. New York: Routledge.
Schreiber, C. (1979).Men and women in transitional occupations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sokoloff, N.J. (1992).Black women and white women in the professions. New York: Routledge.
Spelman, E. V. (1988).Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston, MA: Beacon.
West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference.Gender & Society, 9, 8–37.
Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions.Social Problems, 39, 253–267.
Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers.Gender & Society, 5, 178–192.
Yoder, J. D. (1994). Looking beyond numbers, The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism outcomes.Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 150–159.
Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1993). Working toward an inclusive psychology of women.American Psychologist, 48, 846–850.
Yoder, J. D., & Sinnett, L. M. (1985). Is it all in the numbers?: A case study of tokenism.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 413–418.
Yoder, J. D., & Aniakudo, P. (1996). “Outsider within” the firehouse: Subordination and difference in the social interactions of African American women firefighters. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Zimmer, J. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory.Social Problems, 35, 64–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoder, J.D., Aniakudo, P. & Berendsen, L. Looking beyond gender: The effects of racial differences on tokenism perceptions of women. Sex Roles 35, 389–400 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544128
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544128