Abstract
Manometric testing was performed on three groups of subjects: 14 patients complaining of fecal incontinence, 14 age- and sex-matched continent patients, and 14 sex-matched younger normal controls. The younger group displayed significantly stronger contractions of the external anal sphincter and puborectalis than the two patient groups, which did not differ. No differences were found in the relaxation of the internal anal sphincter. The incontinent group required a significantly larger stimulus in order to detect rectal distension compared to either the continent patients or the younger normals. An additional group of unmatched normals and incontinent patients demonstrated significant differences in their ability to retain rectally infused saline. The patients leaked sooner and retained less;however, the performance of the normals was considerably reduced from that reported in previous studies. The aging process seems to result in weakening of the striated muscles of the anal canal, although fecal incontinence need not occur. The afferent limb of the anorectal sensorimotor mechanism does not necessarily deteriorate with aging. A lower threshold for sensation of rectal distension among continent individuals apparently helps them to avoid incontinent episodes, even though maximum contractile pressures in their anal canal are no different from a comparable group of incontinent individuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alva J, Mendeloff AI, Schuster MM: Reflex and electromy-ographic abnormalities associated with fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 53:101–106, 1967
Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read MG, Ana CS, Fordtran JS: A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea. Gastroenterology 76:747–756, 1979
Leigh RJ, Turnberg LA: Faecal incontinence: The unvoiced symptom. Lancet 1:1349–1351, 1982
Read NW, Hayes WG, Bartolo DCC, Hall J, Read MG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG: Use of anorectal manometry during rectal infusion of saline to investigate sphincter function in incontinent patients. Gastroenterology 85:105–113, 1983
Read NW, Bartolo DCC, Read MG: Differences in anal function in patients with incontinence to solids and in patients with incontinence to liquids. Br J Surg 71:39–42, 1984
Goligher JC, Huges ESR: Sensibility of the rectum and colon: Its role in the mechanism of anal incontinence. Lancet 1:543–548, 1951
Katz LA, Kaufmann JH, Spiro HM: Anal sphincter pressure characteristics. Gastroenterology 52:513–518, 1967
Whitehead WE, Engel BT, Schuster MM: Perception of rectal distention is necessary to prevent fecal incontinence.In Advances in Physiological Sciences, Vol 17, Brain and Behavior. G Adam, I Meszaros, EI Banyai (eds). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado, 1981
Wald A, Tunuguntla AK: Anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction in fecal incontinence and diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 310:1282–1287, 1984
Schiller LR, Santa Ana CA, Schmulen AC, Hendler RS, Harford WV, Fordtran JS: Pathogenesis of fecal incontinence in diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 307:1666–1671, 1982
Loening-Bauke V, Anuras S: Effects of age and sex on anorectal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 80:50–53, 1985
Bruning JL, Kintz BL: Computational Handbook of Statistics. Glenview, Illinois, Scott, Foresman and Company, 1977
Welch BL: The generalization of Student's problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34:28–35, 1947
Aspin AA: Tables for use in comparisons whose accuracy involves two variances separately estimated. Biometrika 36:290–293, 1949
Bartolo DCC, Jaratt JA, Read MG, Donnelly TC, Read NW: The role of partial denervation of the puborectalis in idiopathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 70:664–667, 1983
Parks AG: Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 68:681–690, 1975
Read MG, Read NW: Role of anorectal sensation in preserving continence. Gut 23:245–347, 1982
Whitehead WE, Schuster MM: Techniques for assessment of the anorectal mechanism.In Psychophysiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. R Holtz, WE Whitehead (eds). New York, Plenum Press, 1983
Engel BT, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM: Operant conditioning of rectosphincteric responses in treatment of fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 190:646–649, 1974
Cerulli MA, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM: Progress in biofeedback conditioning for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 76:742–746, 1979
Whitehead WE, Parker LH, Masek BJ, Cataldo MF, Freeman JM: Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence in meningomyelocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 23:313–321, 1981
Wald A: Use of biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence in patients with meningomyelocele. Pediatrics 68:45–49, 1981
Whitehead WE, Burgio KL, Engel BT: Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence in geriatric patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 33:320–324, 1985
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, M.L., Orr, W.C. & Robinson, M.G. Anorectal functioning in fecal incontinence. Digest Dis Sci 33, 36–40 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536628
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536628