Skip to main content
Log in

The NTEE classification system: tests of reliability/validity in the field of higher education

  • Articles
  • Published:
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of the field of higher education reveals a surprisingly large number of classification errors within the (US) National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities database. Of the nearly 4,000 non-profit entities coded within the universe of institutions of higher education, we estimate that approximately 60 per cent were incorrectly included (Type II errors). Institutions incorrectly excluded from the higher education universe (Type I errors) represent roughly 10 per cent of the institutions coded correctly. These errors result primarily from assigning codes on the basis of the names of organisations (for example, ‘College Park Towers’ is classified as a college, when it is in fact a housing complex for senior citizens) and from trying too hard to assign codes in ambiguous situations. The consequences can be significant for the users of these data, and we recommend raising bright warning flags while simultaneously enlisting the help of the entire non-profit sector in improving the classification coding process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hodgkinson, V., Weitzman, M., Toppe, C. and Noga, S. (eds)(1992)Nonprofit Almanac, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, O. (1963) Qui numerare incipit errare incipit,Fortune, 68, October, 143.

  • Morgenstern, O. (1950)On The Accuracy of Economic Observations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (completely revised, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (1991)Digest of Educational Statistics, Department of Education, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • Philanthropy Monthly (1990) At stake: meaningful statistics, 23 March, 17–18.

  • Philanthropy Monthly (1991) The not-for-profit classification system offers opportunities and risks, 24, July/August, 8–11.

  • Rodenhouse, M. (ed.) (1992)Higher Education Directory, Higher Education Publications, Falls Church, Virginia. Machine-readable version obtained from John Minter Associates, Boulder, Colorado.

  • Toppe, C. and Noga, S. (1992) The NTEE classification system: more than we had, less than we need, unpublished manuscript provided by the authors, 22 July.

  • Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language (1964) Unabridged, G.& C. Merriam, Springfield, Massachusetts.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The authors are with The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. In addition to our colleagues on the staff of the Foundation, we wish to thank Helmut Anheier, Ted Bozovich, Harvey Dale, Virginia Hodgkinson, Stephen Noga and Christopher Toppe for helpful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, S.E., Nygren, T.I. & Bowen, W.G. The NTEE classification system: tests of reliability/validity in the field of higher education. Voluntas 4, 73–94 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01398385

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01398385

Keywords

Navigation