Skip to main content
Log in

Realism and antirealism in social science

  • Special Issue On The Fur VI Conference
  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Up until recently social scientists took it for granted that their task was to account for the social world as objectively as possible: they were realists in practice if not always in their methodological sermons. This situation started to change in the 1960s, when a number of antirealist philosophies made inroads into social studies.

This paper examines critically the following kinds of antirealism: subjectivism, conventionalism, fictionism, social constructivism, relativism, and hermeneutics. An attempt is made to show that these philosophies are false and are causing serious damage to social studies.

Next the subjective interpretation of probability is analyzed as a case of subjectivism. An approach to the subjective perception of justice is sketched as an example of the objective study of subjective experience.

Finally, the three main varieties of realism — naive, critical, and scientific — are outlined. It is argued that the scientific attitude involves scientific realism, which is put in practice even by scholars who, like Weber and Simmel, called themselves antirealists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, H.: 1988, ‘Hermeneutics and economics. A criticism of hermeneutical thinking in the social sciences’,Kyklos 41, 573–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M.: 1987, ‘Resisting the revival of relativism’,International Sociology 2, 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B.: 1977,Interests and the Growth of Knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B.: 1983, ‘On the conventional character of knowledge and cognition’, in K.D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (Eds.), pp. 19–51.

  • Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T.: 1966,The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1976,Knowledge and Social Imagery, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R.: 1990a,L'art de se persuader des idés fausses, fragiles ou douteuses, Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R.: 1990b, ‘On relativism’, in P. Weingartner and G. Dorn (Eds.), pp. 229–243.

  • Breit, W.: 1984, ‘Galbraith and Friedman: Two versions of economic reality’,Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 7, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1963,The Myth of Simplicity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1967,Foundations of Physics, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1973,Philosophy of Physics, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1983,Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 6:Understanding the World, Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1988, ‘Two faces and three masks of probability’, in E. Agazzi (Ed.),Probability in the Sciences, pp. 27–50. Dordrecht-Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1989,Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 8:Ethics. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1991a, ‘A critical examination of the new sociology of science, Part 1’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21, 524–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1991b, ‘A skeptics's beliefs and disbeliefs’,New Ideas in Psychology 9, 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1991c, ‘What is science? Does it matter to distinguish it from pseudoscience? A reply to my commentators’,New Ideas in Psychology 9, 245–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1992, ‘A critical examination of the new sociology of science, Part 2’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22, 44–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1992, ‘A critical examination of the new sociology of science. Part 2’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22, 46–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.V.: 1974,Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M.: 1983, ‘An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge’, in Knorr-Cetina and Mulkay (Eds.), pp. 85–113.

  • du Pasquier, G.: 1926,Le calcul des probabilités, son évolution mathématique et philosophique, Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrater Mora, J.M.: 1990, ‘On Mario Bunge's semantical realism’, in Weingartner and Dorn (Eds.), pp. 29–37.

  • Feynman, R.P.: 1989,What do You Care What other People Think? New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, L.: [1935] 1979,Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Preface by T.S. Kuhn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1953, ‘The methodology of positive economics’, inEssays in Positive Economics, pp. 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1976,Price Theory, New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M.: 1992, ‘Probability paradoxes’,Skeptical Inquirer 16, 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H.: 1967,Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C.: 1973,The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1958, ‘The test of simplicity’,Science 128, 1064–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A.: 1955,The Counter-Revolution of Science, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M.: 1966,Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: [1931] 1950,Cartesianische Meditationen, inHusserliana: Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 1, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K.D. and Mulkay, M. (Eds.): 1983,Science Observed, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalande, A.: 1938,Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie, 4th ed., 3 vols. Paris: Félix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1983, ‘Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world’, in Knorr-Cetina and Mulkay (Eds.), pp. 141–170.

  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.: 1979,Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, P.: 1988,Literary Knowledge, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1990,Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: 1957,Social Theory and Social Structure, Rev. Ed., Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P.: 1975,La métaphore vive, Paris: Ed. du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A.: [1932] 1967,The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1987,Relativism Refuted: A Criticism of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism, Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. and Dorn, G. (Eds.): 1990,Studies on Mario Bunge's Treatise, Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunge, M. Realism and antirealism in social science. Theor Decis 35, 207–235 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075199

Keywords

Navigation