Skip to main content
Log in

The structure of self-reports of emotional responses to film segments

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subjects viewed eight short film segments and rated the strength of their responses within eight emotion categories. Principal-components analysis showed that these ratings varied along three dimensions: Amused-Warmhearted, Fearful-Anxious, and Disgusted-Scornful. Clusters of film segment centroids occupied distinct regions within this reduced space, and moderate homogeneity was found when the individual ratings were assigned to the centroids of these clusters. Further analyses concerned the reliability of the ratings over time, the effects of prior exposure, and sex differences. Ratings obtained on a subset of these film segments during a subsequent psychophysiological experiment were analyzed to test the generalizability of the results of Study 1. The factor patterns were very similar, as were tests for the homogeneity of the ratings. The structure of self-reports of elicited affect and the utility of film stimuli are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, R. P., & Sermat, V. Multidimensional scaling of facial expressions.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1962,63 546–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg, M. R.Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R. A semantic atlas of emotional concepts.JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology 1975,5 330. (Ms. No. 421)

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, J. Induced moods and attitudes toward products.Journal of Advertising Research 1963,3 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, L. E., II. Individual differences in multidimensional scaling of adjectives denoting feelings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973,25 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittman, A. T.Interpersonal messages of emotion. New York: Springer, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ancoli, S. Facial signs of emotional experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980,39 1125–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P.Emotion in the human face. New York: Permagon Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. S., & Cliff, N. Multidimensional comparisons of structures of vocally and facially expressed emotions.Perception and Psychophysics 1975,17 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C., & Lilly, R. S. The structure of mood: A comparison between sleep deprivation and normal wakefulness conditions.Journal of Personality 1970,38 453–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E.The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E.Patterns of emotions. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes.Psychometrika 1967,32 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Alfert, E. Short-circuiting of threat by experimentally altering cognitive appraisal.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1964,69 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Speisman, J. C., Mordkoff, A. M., & Davison, L. A. A laboratory study of psychological stress produced by a motion picture film.Psychological Monographs, 1962,76, (34, Whole No. 553).

  • Levison, C. A. Perceived similarity and the judgement of mood in others.Journal of Social Psychology 1963,61 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, D. M., & Lorr, M. An analysis of mood in neurotics.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1964,69 620–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meddis, R. Bipolar factors in mood adjective checklists.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1972,11 178–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowlis, V. Research with the Mood Adjective Check List. In S. S. Tomkins & C. E. Izard (Eds.),Affect, cognition, and personality. New York: Springer, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowlis, V., & Green, R. F.Factor analytic studies of mood. Technical Report, Office of Naval Research: Contract No. Nonr-668(12), 1964.

  • Nowlis, V., & Nowlis, H. H. The description and analysis of mood.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1956,65 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. Dimensionality of the semantic space for communication via facial expressions.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1966,7 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. On the whys and wherefores of E, P, and A.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,12 194–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polivy, J. On the induction of emotion in the laboratory: Discrete moods or multiple affect states?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,41 803–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, R.Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York: Harper & Row, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal, D. C., & Hays, W. L. Empirical dimensions of emotional behavior.Acta Psychologica 1959,15 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. Evidence for convergent validity on the dimensions of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 1152–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. Affective space is bipolar.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. A circumplex model of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980,39 1161–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Mehrabian, A. Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions.Journal of Research in Personality 1977,11 273–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, H. The description of facial expressions in terms of two dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952,44 229–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, H. Three dimensions of emotion.Psychological Review 1954,61 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function.Psychometrika 1962,27 125–139; 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J. G., & Osgood, C. E.Semantic differential technique. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speisman, J. C., Lazarus, R. S., Mordkoff, A., & Davison, L. Experimental reduction of stress based on ego-defense theory.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1964,68 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. E. Measurement of activation through self-report.Psychological Reports 1967,20 663–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Ellsworth, P. C. The role of facial response in the experience of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 1519–1531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Klorman, R., Larrance, D. T., & Spiegel, N. H. Facial, autonomic, and subjective components of emotion: The facial feedback hypothesis versus the externalizer-internalizer distinction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,41 929–944.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant 77-08926 and by funds from the Lincoln Filene endowment to Dartmouth College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McHugo, G.J., Smith, C.A. & Lanzetta, J.T. The structure of self-reports of emotional responses to film segments. Motiv Emot 6, 365–385 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998191

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998191

Keywords

Navigation