Abstract
Some psychoanalytic training institutes in this country more closely resemble religious cults than centers of learning. Institutes which foster the establishment of multiple role relationships between students and their instructors often unwittingly exploit students' dependence in a variety of ways. Further, there is also a conflict of interest between the institute's stated organizational goals and its need to survive. Consequently, there is a bias toward entropy. After a time, psychoanalytic institutes, like all systems, wind down. The purpose of this article is to alert the professional community to the potential hazards of the complicated relationships between instructors and supervisors at these institutes. Research studies suggest a tendency toward the development of a group-think environment where critical thinking and scientific analysis are subverted. Narcissistic gratification and passive acceptance of leaders' teachings prevail. The implications for the well-being of the candidates and the prospects for reform are explored.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
American Group Psychotherapy Association (1991).Ethical guidelines. New York: American Group Psychotherapy Association.
American Psychological Association (1980).The ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Dulchin, J., and Siegel, A. (1982). The ambiguity of confidentiality in a psychoanalytic institute.”Psychiatry, 45, 27–37.
Kramer, E. (1987). The analyst's resolution of revenge resulting from the treatment of his parents,Modern Psychoanalysis, 12, 207–219.
Mason, J. (1990).Final analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Pepper, R. (1989) Therapist's transparency and multiple role relations.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39, 131–132.
Pepper, R. (1990). When transference isn't transference: Iatrogenesis of multiple role relations between practicing therapists.”Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 20, 141–153.
Pepper, R. (1991). The senior therapist's grandiosity: Clinical and ethical consequences of merging multiple roles,Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 21, 6–370.
Postman, N., and Weingartner, C. (1969).Teaching as a subversive activity. New York: Delacorte Press.
Temerlin, J., and Temerlin, M. (1982). Psychotherapy cults: An iatrogenic perversion,Psychotherapy, 40, 131–140.
Temerlin, J. and Temerlin, M. (1986). Some hazards of the therapeutic relationship,Cultic Studies Journal, 2, 234–242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pepper, R.S. Psychoanalytic training institutes as cults: An example of entropy. J Contemp Psychother 22, 35–42 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00952340
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00952340