Skip to main content
Log in

Executive processing differences between learning-disabled, mildly retarded, and normal achieving children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined possible executive processing differences between mildly retarded, learning-disabled, and normal achieving children. To this end, the groups were compared as to their ability to recall central and secondary words from base and elaborative sentences under conditions of high and low encoding effort. Executive processing was inferred from the children's ability to maintain optimal recall performance for central and secondary words. Groups were comparable in central recall, but differences in secondary recall occurred for the high- effort encoding condition. Qualitative differences related to the prioritizing of resources (as reflected in the correlation between central and secondary recall) and monitoring the transfer of information (as reflected from central and secondary recall insertions) were found between groups. The results were discussed in terms of an executive processing frame-work that views retarded children as suffering from inefficiencies related to the sharing of resources, whereas the learning-disabled children's inefficiencies were related to the discrimination of resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambler, B., & Maples, W. (1977). Role of rehearsal in encoding and organization for free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Eldridge, M., Lewis, V., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.),Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. VIII, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Logie, R., Bressi, S., Sala, D., & Spinnler, H. (1986). Dementia and working memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38A, 603–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. H., & Emhert, J. (1984). Information processing in reading-disabled and non-disabled children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 365–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J. G., & Buchel, F. P. (1985). Learning and memory strategies in the mentally retarded. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.),Cognitive strategy research: Psychological foundations (pp. 103–128). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J. G., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (1979). Maintenance and generalization of skills and strategies by the retarded. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),Handbook of mental deficiency (pp. 569–618). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., & Smith, J. W. (1985). Cognitive demands of processing expository text: A cognitive workbench model. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.),Understanding expository text (pp. 227–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychology theory and the study of learning difficulties.American Psychologist, 41, 1059–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, E. C., & Ferretti, R. P. (1983). Some extensions of the instructional approach to cognitive development and a sufficient condition for transfer of training. In P. H. Brooks, C. McCauley, & R. Sperber (Eds.),Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 80–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Learning ability and transfer propensity as sources of individual differences in intelligence. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, and C. McCauley (Eds.),Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 265–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1982). Mental retardation and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 392–473). New York: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallego, M., & Moeley, B. (1980). Free recall in boys of normal and poor reading levels.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. C., Roger, L. T., & Rodriquez, I. A. (1984). Emotional mood states and memory: Elaborative encoding, semantic processing, and cognitive effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 10, 470–482.Federal Register. (1977).42 (250).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M. (1985). Memory for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in learning disability subgroups: Analysis by selective reminding.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 244–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system.Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, V. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, P. M., & Mosley, J. L. (1987). Mentally retarded and nonretarded individuals' attention allocation and capacity.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 91, 598–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, R. D., & Eggemeir, F. T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. II, 42: pp. 1–43). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, G. D., Levine, J. M., & Eisner, E. J. (1979). Measurement of workload by secondary tasks.Human Factors, 21, 529–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, B. P. (1985).Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Essential of subtype analysis. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach.Cognition, 24, 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S., & Linder, A. (1984). Short-term memory processes in children with reading and arithmetic disabilities.Developmental Psychology, 20, 200–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somberg, B. L., & Salthouse, T. A. (1982). Divided attention abilities in young and old adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 651–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. S., & Bransford, J. D. (1979). Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of precision and subject generation.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 769–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. S., Morris, C. D., & Bransford, J. D. (1978). Constraints on effective elaboration.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 707–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (1984). Effects of cognitive effort and word distinctiveness of learning disabled and nondisabled readers' recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 794–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (1986). Do semantic memory deficiencies underlie learning disabled readers' encoding process?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 461–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (1989). The effects of central processing strategies on learning disabled, mildly retarded, average, and gifted children's elaborative encoding abilities.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 370–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarver, S., Hallahan, D., Kauffman, J., & Ball, D. (1976). Verbal rehearsal and selective attention in children with learning disabilities: A developmental lag.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 375–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Executie control of reading. In B. Britton (Ed.),Executive control processes in reading (pp. 1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1980a). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance (Vol. VII, pp. 239–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1980b). Human workload measurement. In N. Moray (Ed.),Mental work-load: Its theory and measurement (pp. 79–100). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., Mountford, S. J., & Schreiner, W. S. (1985). Multiple resources, task-hemispheric integrity, and individual differences in time sharing.Human Factors, 23, 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden, P. E. (1986). Prose comprehension and recall in disabled readers. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.),Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 241–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is indebted to Karl Schemdli, Director of Special Education and Susan Swaim, Research Director, University of Northern Colorado Laboratory School, for their administration assistance in providing children for this study. The author is indebted to Dr. Jim Nicholes for his assistance in the data collection.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swanson, H.L. Executive processing differences between learning-disabled, mildly retarded, and normal achieving children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 18, 549–563 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911107

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911107

Keywords

Navigation