Skip to main content
Log in

The use of microfluorometry to study DNA in nasopharyngeal carcinomas: a possible prognostic tool?

  • Published:
Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A microfluorometric method was used to determine the nuclear DNA content in the nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) of 25 patients treated before 1983. Eleven patients are still alive with no evidence of disease (NED), while the rest died of their disease (DOD). All of the patients received a cycle of radiotherapy, while some also received chemotherapy or neck dissections. The neoplastic cells studied were taken from the original biopsy blocks, deparaffinized, isolated by enzymatic treatment and mechanical fragmentation, and then Feulgen-stained. The cytofluorometric measurement was carried out by a microphotometer equipped for fluorescence excitation and connected to a computer. This method allowed us to construct a histogram of the DNA content in the neoplastic cells. Different neoplastic classes were identified and represent the heteroclonality of the tumor, which can be expressed by the heteroclonality index (HCT). From the collected data it appears that the NED patients all had a low HTC (<1) and only 7 of the DOD patients had low HTCs (<1). Six of the DOD patients with a low HTC were in advanced stages of their tumor at the time of diagnosis, while the remaining patient did not complete his treatment. Our results show that the DNA analysis of the NPC cell population may offer a useful tool in predicting the biological behavior of this tumor and also improving its treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkin NB (1976) Prognostic significance of ploidy level in human tumors I. Carcinoma of the uterus. J Natl Cancer Inst 56:909–910

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benson RC, Meyer RA, Zaruba ME, McKhann GM (1979) Cellular autofluorescence. Is it due to flavins? J Histochem Cytochem 27:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohm N, Sprenger E (1968) Fluorescence cytophotometry: a valuable method for the quantitative determination of nuclear Feulgen DNA. Histochemie 16:100–118

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chieco P, Melchiorri C, Lisignoli G, Marabini A, Orlandi C (1987) Studio dell'instabilità genetica del carcinoma ovarico tramite citofluorimetria del DNA. I tumori dell'ovaio. In: Monduzzi G (ed) Atti del Convegno Internazionale “I tumori delle gonadi”, Ancona, vol V, pp 83–89

  5. Duijiam WAL, Van Duijin P (1975) The influence of chromatin compactness on the stoichiometry of the Feulgen-Schiff procedure studied in model films. II. Investigations on films containing condensed or swollen chicken erythrocyte nuclei. J Histochem Cytochem 23:891–900

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giangaspero F, Chieco P, Lisignoli G, Burger PC (1987) Comparison of cytologic composition with microfluorometric DNA analysis of the glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Cancer 60:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW, Rugg CA, Musgrove EA (1983) Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow-cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 31:1333–1335

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heppner GH (1984) Tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 44:2259–2265

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iversen OE, Laerum OD (1985) Ploidy disturbances in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 7:327–336

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krueger GRF, Wustrow J (1981) Current histological classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the Cologne University. In: Grundman E, Krueger GRA, Ablashi DW (eds) Cancer compaign, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, vol 5. Fisher, Stuttgart, pp 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moberger B, Auer G, Forsslund G, Moberger G (1984) The prognostic significance of DNA measurements in endometrial carcinoma. Cytometry 5:430–436

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prenna G, Leiva S, Mazzini G (1974) Quantitation of DNA by cytofluorometry of the conventional Feulgen reaction. Histochem J 6:467–489

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shapiro JR, Yung WA, Shapiro WR (1981) Isolation karyotype and clonal growth of heterogeneous subpopulations of human malignant gliomas. Cancer Res 41:2344–2359

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takamatsu T, Nakanishi K, Onouchi Z, Fukuda M, Fujita S (1980) Nonspecific (pseudo-plasmal) dye binding in the Feulgen nuclear stain and its blocking by Azocarmin. J Histochem 66:169–180

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caliceti, U., Rinaldi Ceroni, A., Lisignoli, G. et al. The use of microfluorometry to study DNA in nasopharyngeal carcinomas: a possible prognostic tool?. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 246, 365–367 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00463596

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00463596

Key words

Navigation