Abstract
Recently, society and the accounting profession have become increasingly concerned with ethics. Accounting researchers have responded by attempting to investigate and analyze the ethical behavior of accountants. While the current state of ethical behavior among practitioners is important, the ability of accountants to detect ethical problems that may not be obvious should also be studied and understood. This study addresses three questions: (1) are auditors alert to ethical issues; (2) if so, how important do they perceive them to be; and (3) what factors affect their sensitivity threshold and their perceptions of the importance of the issues?
Most of the prior research in accounting ethics presents subjects with scenarios that contain an obvious ethical issue, and subjects realize that they are participating in an ethics study. In the present study, the ethical problems are integrated into general accounting situations in order to discover the sensitivity of accounting professionals to them. This study defines ethical sensitivity as the ability to interpret a given situation and to realize that a moral problem exists.
CPAs responded to an experimental instrument comprised of three auditing scenarios taken from the 1989 Trueblood cases, adapted to deal with different ethical problems — tax evasion by a client, auditor independence, and a client's ethical problem which does not directly affect the audit. The accounting and/or auditing problems presented in the three cases were also different with the information relating to the possible ethical problem embedded in the situation. Multiway contingency tables were used to analyze the data.
Factors useful in predicting whether a subject will mention an ethical issue include the nature of the ethical issue, the issue's severity, and the subject's age. Employment position, expertise (measured by two proxies), prior exposure to a similar ethical issue and education level (undergraduate versus graduate) were not significant. The ethical issue itself was also a significant factor in determining the absolute importance given to the ethical issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Accounting Association Committee on the Future Structure, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education (AAA): 1986. ‘Future Accounting Education: Preparing for the Expanding Profession’, Issues in Accounting Education 14 (Spring), 168–195.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: 1988, Code of Professional Conduct, New York.
Anderson, G. D. and R. C. Ellyson: 1986, ‘Restructuring Professional Standards: The Anderson Report’, Journal of Accountancy (Sept.), 92–104.
Bayles, M. D.: 1989, Professional Ethics (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA).
Bebeau, M. J., M. Oberle and J. R. Rest: 1984, ‘Developing Alternate Cases for the Dental Sensitivity Test (DEST). Program and Abstracts, Abstract no. 228, Journal of Dental Research (March), 196.
Bebeau, M. J., N. M. Reifel and T. M. Speidel: 1981, ‘Measuring the type and Frequency of Professional Dilemmas in Dentistry. Program and Abstracts, Abstract no. 891, Journal of Dental Research (March), 385.
Bebeau, M. J., J. R. Rest and C. M. Yamoor: 1985, ‘Measuring Dental Students' Ethical Sensitivity’, Journal of Dental Education 41 (4), 225–235.
Boylan, K. A., R. C. Icerman and J. N. Karcher: 1990, Evidence on Moral Development: Governmental Auditors. Paper presented at the 1900 AAA Southeast Regional Convention.
Carey, J. L. and W. O. Doherty: 1966, Ethical Standards of the Accounting Profession (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York).
Davis, R. R.: 1984, ‘Ethical Behavior Reexamined’, CPA Journal 14, 32–36.
Deloitte & Touch Foundation: 1989, The Robert M. Trueblood Accounting and auditing Case Studies Series, (Deloitte & Touche, New York).
Finn, D. W., L. B. Chonko and S. D. Hunt: 1988, ‘Ethical Problems in Public Accounting: The View from the Top, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 605–615.
Gioia, D. A.: 1992, ‘Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(5/6), 379–389.
Hall, W. D.: 1992, ‘Ethical Issues in the Practice of Accounting’, in W. S. Albrecht (ed.), Ethical issues in the Practice of Accounting (South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, Ohio), pp. 31–43.
Harrell, A., M. Taylor and E. Chewning: 1989, ‘An Examination of Management's Ability to Bias the Professional objectivity of Internal Auditors’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 14(3), 259–269.
Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395.
Lindsey, R. T.: 1986, ‘Differences in Moral Sensitivity Based Upon Varying Levels of Counseling Training and Experience’, Ph.D. diss., University of Denver.
Loeb, S. E.: 1971, ‘A Survey of Ethical Behavior in the Accounting Profession’, Journal of Accounting Research 9(3), 287–306.
Mayer, J.: 1988, ‘Themes of Social Responsibility: A Survey of Three Professional Schools’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 313–320.
Millspaugh, P. E.: 1990, ‘Plant Closing Ethics Root in American Law’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(8), 665–670.
National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Treadway Commission): 1987, Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting.
Noreen, E.: 1988, ‘The Economics of Ethics: A New Perspective on Agency Theory’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13(4): 359–369.
Ponemon, L. A.: 1990, ‘Ethical Judgments in Accounting: A Cognitive-Developmental Perspective’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1, 191–215.
Ponemon, L. A. and D. R. L. Gabhart: ‘Auditor Independence Judgments: A Cognitive-Development Model and Evidence’, Contemporary Accounting Research, Forthcoming.
Porter, L. W. and L. E. McKibbin: 1988, Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).
Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger Publishers, New York).
Sack, R. J.: 1992, ‘Ethical Issues in the Practice of Accounting’, in W. S. Albrecht (ed.), Ethical Issues in the Practice of Accounting, (South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, Ohio), pp. 21–30.
Shaub, M. K.: 1989, ‘An Empirical Examination of Determinants of Auditors' Ethical Sensitivity’, Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
Volker, J. M.: 1984, ‘Counseling Experience, Moral Judgment, Awareness of Consequences, and Moral Sensitivity in Counseling Practice’, Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Westra, L. S.: 1986, ‘Whose ‘Loyal Agent’? Towards an Ethic of Accounting’, Journal of Business Ethics 5(5), 119–128.
Whittington, O. R., K. Pany, W. B. Meigs and R. F. Meigs: 1992, Principles of Auditing, Tenth Edition (Richard Irwin, Inc., New York).
Wickens, T. D.: 1989, ‘Multiway Contingency Tables Analysis for the Social Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.).
Zeff, S. A.: 1987, ‘Does the CPA Belong to a Profession?’, Accounting Horizons 9(2), 65–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Julia N. Karcher, is an assistant professor at the University of Louisville. She has co-authored articles in the Accounting Educators' Journal and Internal Auditor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karcher, J.N. Auditors' ability to discern the presence of ethical problems. J Bus Ethics 15, 1033–1050 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412045
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412045