Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of flowering plant's patch size on species composition of pollinator communities, foraging strategies, and resource partitioning in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In 4 common Middle-European mainly bumblebee-pollinated plant species (Impatiens glandulifera, Echium vulgare, Aconitum napellus, Symphytum officinale) the influence of patch size on species composition of the pollinator community was studied. Short-tongued species were most dominant in large patches, while small patches were frequented by middle- and long-tongued bumblebees. This phenomenon was extremely obvious in Symphytum officinale and Aconitum napellus, where short-tongued species had bitten a hole in nearly every flower of large patches. Long-tongued species were forced to small patches, where nectarrobbing occurred only exceptionally. In small patches visitationrate (Number of visits per flower per hour) was not lower but either equal or even higher then in large patches. Nectar measurements in Echium vulgare showed, that not only the mean quantity of nectar but also the variance was lower in small patches. As a result, the possible gain can be predicted much more precisely in a small patch than in a large one, and bumblebees have less difficulties in making the right foraging decisions. According to this, foraging strategies depend on patch size. This was confirmed by a computer simulation. The conclusion can be drawn, that many bumblebee species are able to share the same resource by using different patch sizes. Since large flower patches occur mainly in man-made habitats, the dominance of short-tongued species in many bumblebee communities studied by other authors may be unnatural.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anasiewicz A, Warakomska Z (1977) Pollen food of the bumblebees (Bombus Latr., Hymenoptera) and their association with the plant species in the Lublin region. Ekol Pol 25:309–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow DA, Pickard RS (1984) Size-related selection of food plants by bumblebees. Ecol Entomol 9:369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet S (1978) Bee visits and the nectar of Echium vulgare L. and Sinapis alba L. Ecol Entomol 3:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P (1976) Organization of a tropical guild of nectarivorous birds. Ecol Monogr 46:257–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Free JB (1955) The collection of food by bumblebees. Insectes Soc 2:303–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1982) Communities of bumblebees: testing the core-satellite species hypothesis. Ann Zool Fenn 19:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1976) Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology 57:874–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges CM (1981) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: Hunting by expectation. Anim Behav 29:1166–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges CM (1985) Bumble bee foraging: energetic consequences of using a threshold departure rule. Ecology 66:188–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1971) Euglossine bees as long-distance oollinators of tropical plants. Science 171:203–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LK, Hubell SP (1975) Contrasting foraging strategies and coexistence of two bee species on a single resource. Ecology 56:1398–1406

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak MM, Holthuizen YA, Pins HHT (1985) A comparison of nectar characteristics of the bumblebee-pollinated Rhinanthus minor and R. serotinus. OIKOS 44:123–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre L, Legendre P (1983) Developments in environmental modelling, vol 3. Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam Oxford New York, 418 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1985) Milkweeds and their visitors. Sci Am 253:90–96C

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittioni B (1942) Hummeln als Blütenbesucher. Mitt Bulg Ent Ges Sofia 12:63–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978 a) Optimal foraging: Movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescence. Theor Popul Biol 13:71–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978 b) Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: Testing the marginal value theorem. Am Zool 17:739–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1980) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: Calculation of net rate of energy intake and optimal patch choice. Theor Popul Biol 17:232–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1982) Local geographic distributions of bumblebees near Crested Bute, Colorado: Competition and community structure. Ecology 63:555–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke B (1983) Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In: Real L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 305–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Lundberg H (1980) Resource partitioning in bumblebees: the significance of differences in proboscis length. OIKOS 35:298–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmont P (1983) Catalogue commenté des bourdons de la région ouest-paléarctique (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Apidae). Notes Faun Gembloux 7:1–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmont P (1984) Les bourdons du genre Bombus Latreille sensu stricto en Europe Occidentale et Centrale. Spixiana 7:135–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkonen O (1938/1939): Statistisch-ökologische Untersuchungen über die terrestrische Käferwelt der finnischen Bruchmoore. Ann Zool Soc Zool Bot Fenn Vanamo 6:1–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Baltus MS (1987) Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology 68:1679–1690

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräs I (1985 a) Food plants and flower visits of bumblebees (Bombus: Hymenoptera, Apidae) in southern Finland. Acta Zool Fenn 179:1–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräs I (1985 b) Flower visits of bumblebees (Bombus: Hymenoptera, Apidae) during one day in northeastern Finland. Notulae Entomol 65:129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD, Allen I, Heinrich B (1981) Floral preferences of bumble bees (Bombus edwardsii) in relation to intermittent versus continuous rewards. Anim Behav 29:779–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright DH (1985) Patch dynamics of a foraging assemblage of bees. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:558–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1981) Patchiness in the dispersion of nectar resources: Probable causes. Oecologia (Berlin) 49:154–157

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the “Landesgraduiertenförderung Baden-Württemberg”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sowig, P. Effects of flowering plant's patch size on species composition of pollinator communities, foraging strategies, and resource partitioning in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Oecologia 78, 550–558 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378747

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378747

Key words

Navigation