Skip to main content
Log in

Seed size in tropical trees: a comparative study of factors affecting seed size in Peruvian angiosperms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary comparative methods taking into account the potential effects of relatedness reveal that, among 202 species of animal-dispersed tropical woody angiosperms from Peru, large seeds may be an adaptation to: (1) dispersal by mammals rather than by birds and (2) greater plant height. Using the most powerful techniques currently available, appropriate comparisons were made between related species or species groups at all taxonomic levels, thus allowing use of all species in the data set. Even so, the results show no evidence of adaptation (i.e., a functional relationship) of seed mass to successional syndrome or to growth form (trees or vines). In previous cross-species analyses, seed mass has been linked to both of these ecological variables. The lack of relationship between seed mass and habitat use or growth form may be due to targeting the wrong trait to predict these two variables, or because seed mass is subject to exaptation, i.e., a particular seed mass has arisen for other reasons, but allows invasion into a habitat and currently serves to maintain that species in the habitat. Differentiation between these two explanations for the lack of correlation between seed mass and successional syndrome or growth form would entail species-by-species examination of the function of seed mass under natural conditions. The effect of relatedness on the ecological correlates of seed mass and plant height is determined for each of three taxonomic schemes. It is concluded that the three schemes do not differ greatly in the results obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augspurger CK (1984) Light requirements of neotropical tree seedlings: a comparative study of growth and survival. J Ecol 72: 777–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker HG (1972) Seed weight in relation to environmental conditions in California Ecology 53: 997–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1984) Comparative approaches to investigating adaptation. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 7–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A (1981) An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1988) Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19: 445–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster SA, Janson CH (1985) The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants. Ecology 66: 773–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland T Jr, Harvey PH, Ives AR (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41: 18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Vrba E (1982) Exaptation — a missing term in the science of form. Palaeobiology 8: 4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 326: 327–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL, Lovell PH, Moore KG (1970) The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1: 327–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH (1991) Comparing uncertain relationships: the Swedes in revolt. Trends Ecol Evol 6: 38–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Krebs JR (1990) Comparing brains. Science 249: 140–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Mace GM (1982) Comparisons between taxa and adaptive trends: problems of methodology. In: K. C. S. Group (eds) Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 343–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey P, Pagel M (1991) The evolutionary method in comparative biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Purvis A (1991) Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351: 619–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Pagel MD, Rees JA (1991) Mammalian metabolism and life histories. Am Nat 137: 556–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CK, Purvis A (1993) Seed size and establishment conditions in tropical trees: on the use of taxonomic relatedness in determining ecological patterns. Oecologia 94: 356–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins EP, Garland T Jr (1991) Phylogenetic analysis of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 435–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer SJ (1989) Taxonomic, ecological and life-history correlates of seed mass among Indiana Dune angiosperms. Ecol Monogr 59: 153–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer SJ (1990) Seed mass of Indiana Dune genera and families: taxonomic and ecological correlates. Evol Ecol 4: 326–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel MD P (1992) A method for the analysis of comparative data. J Theor Biol 156: 431–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel MD, Harvey PH (1988) Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data. Q Rev Biol 63: 413–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel MD, Harvey PH, Godfray HCJ (1991) Species-abundance, biomass, and resource-use distributions. Am Nat 138: 836–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A (1991) Comparative analysis by independent contrasts, version 1.2. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford

  • Purvis A (1992) Comparative methods: theory and practice. D Phil thesis, University of Oxford

  • Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Luh H-K (1993) Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J Theor Biol 167: 293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (1983) The explanation of organic diversity: the comparative method and adaptations for mating. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury EJ (1942) The reproductive capacity of plants. Bell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan AL (1980) Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot Rev 46: 225–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne RF (1983) Proposed new realignments in the angiosperms. Nord J Bot 3: 85–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, C.K. Seed size in tropical trees: a comparative study of factors affecting seed size in Peruvian angiosperms. Oecologia 102, 377–388 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329805

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329805

Key words

Navigation