Skip to main content
Log in

L'Observation de classes et le paradoxe de l'observateur

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we try to determine the knowledge which can be drawn from classroom observations, and we consider what are the limitations and the powers of the different ways of using them. The most important limitations come from the ‘observer's paradox’ (to look for what happens in a natural situation without any observer), and the subjectivity of witnesses. We analyze various pseudo-scientific methods and see that they have more inconveniences than the ‘à l'oeil nu’ observation.

In spite of these limitations, methodical observations (with video-tape, for instance) are a prodigious source of information for teacher-training and for educational research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adda, J.: 1976, ‘L'apport des témoignages audiovisuels à la formation des maîtres et à la recherche didactique en mathématiques’, Media, pp. 17–19 (Mars, 1976).

  • Bourdieu, P.: 1978, ‘Sur l'objectivation participante’, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, No. 23, pp. 67–69.

  • Bulletin APMEP et IREM de Strasbourg: 1977, ‘La communication dans la classe’, L'ouvert, No. 11, pp. 15–25.

  • Chevrolet, D. et Le Calve, G.: 1975, ‘Influence de la présence et de la position d'un observateur sur le comportement scolaire d'élèves de l'enseignement élémentaires’, Revue française de Pédagogie, No. 31, pp. 16–33.

  • De Ketele, J. M.: 1980, Observer pour éduquer (Ed. P. Lang), Berne.

  • Fauquet, M. et Strasfogel, S.: 1972, L'audiovisuel au service de la formation des enseignants, Delagrave, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauquet, M. et Strasfogel, S.: 1974, ‘Video-formation et individualisation’, Didacta 74.

  • Freudenthal, H.: 1978, Weeding and Sowing, Preface to a Science of Mathematical Education, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, R., Massonat, J. et Piolat, M.: 1978, ‘Formation par l'observation de situations éducatives’, Revue Française de Pédagogie No. 43, pp. 47–61.

  • Labov, W.: 1976, Sociolinguistique, Editions de Minuit, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E.: 1977, La méthode; Tome I: La nature de la nature, Editions du Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postic, M.: 1977, Observation et formation des enseignants, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, R.: 1979, ‘Ethnographic research in the study of education’, Cours Cornell University à Berkeley (U.S.A.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. et Jacobson, L.: 1968, Pygmalion à l'école, Casterman, Tournai.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adda, J. L'Observation de classes et le paradoxe de l'observateur. Educ Stud Math 13, 21–32 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305496

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305496

Navigation