Skip to main content
Log in

Pocket-size, portable surface EMG device in the differentiation of low back pain patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The relevance of surface EMG of the paraspinal muscles measured by a portable, pocket-size device with a special amplifier was evaluated in different low back pain groups. Patients with only local low back pain had significantly higher EMG activities than those with unilateral radiating pain without verified disc herniation, those with verified disc herniation, and controls, but there were no differences between the latter three groups. Pain clearly modified paravertebral muscle activity, as the patients experiencing pain during the recording showed significantly higher EMG activities than those with no pain. It is concluded that surface EMG is a valid tool for indirectly assessing pain in low back pain patients but not for classification into different diagnostic groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahern KD, Follick MJ, Council JR, Laser-Wolston N, Lichman H (1988) Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-pain controls. Pain 34:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arena JG, Sherman RA, Bruno GM, Young TR (1989) Electromyographic recordings of 5 types of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in different positions. Pain 37:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins GA, Cohen MJ, Naliboff BD, Schandler SL (1982) Comparative analysis of paraspinal and frontalis EMG, heart rate and skin conductance in chronic low back pain patients and normals to various postures and stress. Scand J Rehab Med 14:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grabel JA (1973) Electromyographic study of low back muscle tension in subjects with and without chronic low back pain. Diss Abstr Int 34(6B):2929–2930

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kravitz E, Moore ME, Glaros A (1981) Paralumbar muscle activity in chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehab 62:172–176

    Google Scholar 

  6. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C (1993) Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine 18:1425–1432

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson ME, Cassisi JE, O'Connor PD, MacMillan M (1992) Lumbar iEMG during isotonic exercise: chronic low back patients versus controls. J Spinal Disord 5:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Akkerveeken PF (1993) On painpatterns of patients with lumbar nerve root entrapment. Neuro-orthop 14:81–102

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vanharanta H, Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD, Stith WJ, Sachs B L, Aprill C, Spivey M, Rashbaum RF, Hochschuler SH, Videman T, Selby DK, Terry A, Mooney V (1988) Disc deterioration in low-back syndromes. A prospective, multi-center CT/discography study. Spine 13:1349–1351

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jalovaara, P., Niinimäki, T. & Vanharanta, H. Pocket-size, portable surface EMG device in the differentiation of low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 4, 210–212 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303412

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303412

Key words

Navigation