Abstract
An individual's subjective evaluation of sexual identity differs from objective evaluation by sex role researchers. This study reports initial validity and reliability data on a new measure of self-ascribed sexual identity: the Sexual Identity Scale (SIS). SIS considers four functional sex dimensions on the basis of components described in both sex and age role literature. SIS and two modified Bem Sex Role Inventory instruments—a Masculinity Trait Index (MTI) and a Femininity Trait Index (FTI)—were administered to an adult sample of 380 men and 380 women aged 20–80. Reliability, assessed with LISREL VI and Cronbach's alpha, was found to be high. LISREL VI findings provide construct validity, both convergent and divergent. The nature of association of biological sex and sex trait measures, high interitem SIS correlations, as well as divergence from the modified sex trait indices (MTI and FTI) also support validity. The study's results and implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barak, B. Cognitive age: A new multidimensional approach to measuring age identity. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 1986, in press.
Barak, B., & Gould, S. Alternative age measures: A research agenda. In E. C. Hirschman & M. B. Holbrook (Eds.), Advances in consumer research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 1985.
Barak, B., & Stern, B. Sex-linked trait indexes among baby-boomers and pre-boomers: A research note. In R. Lutz (Ed.), Advances in consumer research XIV. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 1986.
Beere, C. A. Women and women's issues: A handbook of tests and measures. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Burke, P. J., & Tully, J. C. The measurement of role identity. Social Forces, 1977, 55, 881–897.
Constantinople, A. Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 389–407.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. Assessment of gender stereotypes: Methodology and components. Psychological Documents, 13, 1–23.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 99–104.
Freimuth, M. J., & Hornstein, G. A. A critical examination of the concept of gender. Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 515–532.
Gaudreau, P. Factor analysis of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 299–302.
Gough, H. G. Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1957.
Hase, H. D., & Goldberg, L. R. Comparative validity of different strategies of constructing personality inventory scales. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 231–248.
Hauser, J. R., & Urban, G. L. The value priority hypothesis for consumer budget plans. Journal of Consumer Research, 1986, 12, 446–462.
Jackson, L. A. Self-conceptions and gender role: The correspondence between gender-role categorization and open-ended self-descriptions. Sex Roles, 1985, 13, 549–566.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. LISREL: Analysis of linear structural models by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: SPSS, Inc., 1984.
Kastenbaum, R., Derbin, V., Sabatini, P., & Artt, S. “The Ages of Me”: Toward personal and interpersonal definitions of functional aging. Aging and Human Development, 1972, 3, 197–211.
Kerlinger, F. N. Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart Winston, 1973.
Lenney, E. Androgyny: Some audacious assertions toward its coming of age. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 703–718. (a)
Lenney, E. Concluding comments on androgyny: Some intimations of its mature development. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 829–840. (b)
Locksley, A., & Colten, M. E. Psychological androgyny: A case of mistaken identity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1017–1031.
Markus, H. Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977, 35, 63–78.
Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Saladi, M. Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 63–78.
Marsh, H. W., & Myers, M. Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Sex Roles, 1986, 14, 397–430.
Myers, A. M., & Gonda, G. Empirical validation of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 304–318. (a)
Myers, A. M., & Gonda, G. Utility of the masculinity-feminity construct: Comparison of traditional and androgyny approaches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 514–522. (b)
Shrauger, J. S., & Osberg, T. M. The relative accuracy of self predictions and judgments by others in psychological assessments. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90, 322–351.
Singleton, C. Biological and social explanations of sex-role stereotyping. In D. H. Hargreaves & A. M. Colley (Eds.), The psychology of sex roles. London: Harper & Row, 1986.
Sirgy, M. J. Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 1982, 9, 287–300.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. The many faces of androgyny: A reply to Locksley and Colten. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1032–1046.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. The Personal Attribute Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-feminity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1974, 4, (Ms. No. 617).
Stern, B. Self-perceived sexual identity: A functional consumer model. In J. M. Hawes & G. B. Glisan (Eds.), Developments in marketing science, Volume X, Akron, OH: Academy of Marketing Science, 1987a, 69–73.
Stern, B. Sex role self-concept measures and marketing: A research note. Psychology and marketing 1987, 5, in press.
Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 92, 347–466.
Whetton, C., & Swindells T. A factor analysis of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1977, 33, 150–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Barbara B. Stern wishes to acknowledge the financial support of the Research Council of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, for a research grant which helped fund this project. She also thanks Michael Belch, Raymond P. Fisk, and James W. Gentry, for their assistance in improving the article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stern, B.B., Barak, B. & Gould, S.J. Sexual identity scale: A new self-assessment measure. Sex Roles 17, 503–519 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287732
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287732