Skip to main content
Log in

Complexity as a characteristic of policies in Albert Breton's economic theory of representative government

  • Notes
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complexity of policies is shown to confer differential benefits on those people who have the time necessary to understand the policies. Understanding is defined to mean the ability to predict the consequences of implementation. Breton's economic theory of representative government postulates three groups in society: politicians, bureaucrats, and citizens, with the first two groups forming government bureaucracies that have policies as their sole output. This paper shows that complexity of policies is preferred by bureaucrats, politicians, and citizens in that order because, as one goes down the list, individuals have less time to understand policies and more policies that affect them. Bureaucrats, in order to achieve a level of incomprehension in the other two groups that mazimizes bureaucratic power, must sometimes design policies that they cannot fully understand themselves. This leads to policies with unintended and unanticipated consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abelson, Philip H. ‘The Federal Regulatory Machine,’ Science 200 (4341), (1978), p. 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, Thomas E., ed. Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Albert. The Economic Theory of Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, Werrett Wallace. Complexity As A Dimension of The School's Technical System, A Working Paper. Eugene, Oregon: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon. July, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Costs of Education. Financing Education in Elementary and Secondary Schools (Interim Report Number 7). Toronto: The Government of Ontario, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Daniel M., ed. ‘Tax and Budget Simplication,’ National Tax Journal 30 (3) (September 1977), pp. 223–369.

  • Johnston, Donald J. How to Survive Canada's Tax Chaos (revised and updated). Markham, Ontario: Paperjacks Ltd., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Wendie. ‘Foundation chairman finds trend toward more simplified tax laws,’ The Financial Post, April 12, 1978, p. B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porte, Todd R., ed. Organized Social Complexity: Challenge to Politics and Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Dinald N. ‘On Coping with Complexity: Planning and Politics,’ Daedalus 97 (1968), pp. 1179–1193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George A. ‘The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information,’ Psychological Review 63 (1956), pp. 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, William A. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, William A. Bureaucracy: Servant or Master? London: The Institute for Economic Affairs, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, Hannu. ‘On the concept of complexity and its relationship to the methodology of policy oriented research,’ Social science information sur les sciences sociales 13 (1) (February 1974), pp. 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. ‘Theories of Bounded Rationality,’ in C.B. McGuire and Roy Radner, eds., Decision and Organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1972, pp. 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, Arthur E. ‘Why Educational Policies Often Fail: The Hyperrationalization Hypothesis,’ The Journal of Curriculum Studies 9 (1), (May 1977), pp. 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bezeau, L.M. Complexity as a characteristic of policies in Albert Breton's economic theory of representative government. Public Choice 34, 493–498 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225684

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225684

Keywords

Navigation