Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminating parts from the whole: determinants of odor mixture perception in squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a task designed to simulate olfactory-guided foraging, the ability of squirrel monkeys to discriminate an artificial 12-component odorant from 3-, 6-, 9- or 11- component submixtures was investigated. A combination of factors was found to contribute to the animals' performance:

  1. 1.

    Discriminability generally decreased as the number of components in the submixture increased.

  2. 2

    Submixtures did not contribute equally to mixture perception, and one component in particular (cineole) disproportionately influenced stimulus discriminability.

  3. 3.

    Interactive effects between submixtures resulted in marked deviations from the general pattern of discriminability.

  4. 4.

    Changes in the relative concentration of submixtures could also influence discriminability.

  5. 5.

    Finally, individual differences in responsiveness to particular stimuli were apparent.

These findings demonstrate that the interaction between components in odor mixtures can be complex and that seemingly small changes in composition can strongly affect perception and thus potential signal function. It is therefore suggested that in future investigations of squirrel monkey semiochemistry, the method of systematically varying submixtures may be particularly useful in defining the contribution of components to a signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM (1975) Standard recommended practice for referencing suprathreshold odor intensity. Am Soc Testing Materials (Phil), E544-575.

  • Baldwin JD (1985) The behavior of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri) in natural environments. In: Rosenblum LA, Coe CL (eds) Handbook of squirrel monkey research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher MD (1974) Pure-tone thresholds of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J Acoust Soc Am 55:196–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttery RG (1981) Vegetable and fruit flavors. In: Teranishi R, Flath RA, Sugisawa H (eds) Flavor research (Recent advances). Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 175–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candland DK, Blumer ES, Mumford MD (1980) Urine as a communicator in a New World primate, Saimiri sciureus. Anim Learn Behav 8:468–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple G (1980) Relationships between aggression, scent marking and gonadal state in a primate, the tamarin Saguinus fuscicollis. In: Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals — vertebrates and aquatic invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple G (1985) The primates I.: Order Anthropoidea. In: Brown RE, MacDonald WD (eds) Social odours in mammals. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 739–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple G (1986) Communication by chemical signals. In: Mitchel G, Erwin J (eds) Comparative primate biology, Vol. 2A. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 531–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple G, Belcher A, Greenfield KL, Küderling I, Nordstrom K, Smith AB (1989) Scent mixtures used as social signals in two primate species: Saguinus fuscicollis and Saguinus o. oedipus. In: Laing DG, Cain WS, McBride RL, Ache BW (eds) Perception of complex tastes and smells. Acad Press, Sydney, pp 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragaszy DM (1985) Cognition in squirrel monkeys: a contemporary perspective. In: Rosenblum LA, Coe CL (eds) Handbook of squirrel monkey research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 55–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross-Isseroff R, Lancet D (1988) Concentration-dependent changes of perceived odor quality. Chem Senses 13:191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy MB, Coe CL, Mendoza SP, Lowe EL, Levine S (1978) Scent-marking and olfactory investigating behavior in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Behav Biol 24:57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf S, Hartmann-Wiesner E, Kühlmorgen B, Mayer S (1974) The behavioral repertoire of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri). Folia Primatol 21:225–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson R, Laska M, Ploog D (1992) A new method for testing perceptual and learning capacities in unrestrained small primates. Folia Primatol 59:56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs GH (1985) Visual system of the squirrel monkey. In: Rosenblum LA, Coe CL (eds) Handbook of squirrel monkey research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan J, Cubicciotti D, Redican WK (1977) Olfactory discrimination of squirrel monkey mothers by their infants. Dev Psychobiol 10:447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keverne EB (1983) Chemical communication in primate reproduction. In: Vandenbergh JG (ed) Pheromones and reproduction in mammals. Acad Press, New York, pp 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing DG, Cain WS, McBride RL, Ache BW (eds) (1989) Perception of complex smells and tastes. Acad Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing DG, Panhuber H, Slotnick BM (1989) Odor masking in the rat. Physiol Behav 45:689–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Hudson R (1992) Ability to discriminate between related odor mixtures. Chem Senses 17:403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Hudson R (1993) Assessing olfactory performance in a New World primate, Saimiri sciureus. Physiol Behav 53:89–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meador DM, Rumbaugh DM, Pate JL, Bard KA (1987) Learning, problem solving, cognition, and intelligence. In: Mitchell G, Erwin J (eds) Comparative primate biology, Vol. 2B. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 17–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertl-Millhollen AS (1986) Territorial scent marking by two sympatric lemur species. In: Duvall D, Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates, Vol. 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 647–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael RP, Bonsall RW (1977) Chemical signals and primate behavior. In: Müller-Schwarze D, Mozell MM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz HR, Barbe CD (1977) Profiling of odor components and their mixtures. Sens Processes 1:212–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nursten HE (1977) The important volatile flavor components of foods. In: Birch GG, Brennan JG, Parker UJ (eds) Sensory properties of foods. Applied Science Publ, London, pp 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passe DH, Walker JC (1985) Odor psychophysics in vertebrates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:431–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploog D, Blitz J, Ploog F (1963) Studies on social and sexual behavior of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Folia Primatol 1:29–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin MD, Cain WS (1990) Attention and learning in the perception of odor mixtures. In: Laing DG, Cain WS (eds) Perception of complex smells and tastes. Academic Press, Sydney, pp 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM (1968) The learning and sensory capacities of the squirrel monkey in phylogenetic perspective. In: Rosenblum LA, Cooper RW (eds) The squirrel monkey. Acad Press, New York, pp 256–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling A (1979) Olfactory communication in prosimians. In: Doyle GA, Martin RD (eds) The study of prosimian behavior. Acad Press, New York, pp 542–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz GG, Rosenblum LA (1980) Novelty, arousal, and nasal marking in the squirrel monkey. Behav Neural Biol 28:116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1969) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laska, M., Hudson, R. Discriminating parts from the whole: determinants of odor mixture perception in squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus . J Comp Physiol A 173, 249–256 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192984

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192984

Key words

Navigation