Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the shock-wave pattern for endoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the electrical events and the resulting shock waves of the spark discharge for electrohydraulic lithotripsy at the tip of a 3.3F probe. Spark generation was achieved by variable combinations of voltage and capacity. The effective electrical output was determined by means of a high-voltage probe, a current coil, and a digital oscilloscope. Peak pressures, rise times, and pulse width of the pressure profiles were recorded using a polyvinylidene difluoride needle hydrophone in 0.9% NaCl solution at a distance of 10 mm. The peak pressure and the slope of the shock front depend solely on the voltage, while the pulse width was correlated with the capacity. Pulses of less than 1-μs duration can be obtained when low capacity is applied and the inductivity of the cables and plugs is kept at a low level. Using chalk as a stone model it was proven that short pulses of high peak pressure provided by a low capacity and a high voltage have a greater impact on fragmentation than the corresponding broader shock waves of lower peak pressure carrying the same energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angeloff A (1972) Hydro electrolithotripsy. J Urol 108: 867–871

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman AJ, Saunders JE (1989) A survey of the acoustic output of commercial extracorporeal shock wave lithotripters. Ultrasound Med Biol 15: 213

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eaton JM, Malin JM, Glenn JF (1972) Electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol 108: 865–866

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodfriend R (1984) Ultrasonic and electrohydraulic lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. Urology 23: 5–8

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison J, Morris DL, Haynes J, Hitchcock A, Womack C, Wherry DC (1987) Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of gall stones—in vitro and animal studies. Gut 28: 267–271

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lamport H, Newman HF (1984) Ultrasonic lithotresis in the ureter. J Urol 76: 520–529

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marberger M (1983) Disintegration of renal and ureteral calculi with ultrasound. Urol Clin North Am 10: 729–742

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reuter HJ (1970) Electronic lithotripsy: transurethral treatment of bladder stones in 50 cases. J Urol 104: 834–838

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reuter HJ, Kern E (1973) Electronic lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. J Urol 110: 181–183

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schoborg TW (1989) Efficacy of electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy in the ureter. J Endourol 3: 361–365

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sievert CE, Silvis SE (1987) Evaluation of electrohydraulic lithotripsy as a mean of gallstone fragmentation in a canine model. Gastrointest Endosc 33: 233–235

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vorreuther R, Engelking R (1992) Features and acoustic output of five different electrohydraulic lithotripters for endoureteral stone treatment. J Endourol 6: 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vorreuther R, Engelking R (1992) Minimally invasive ureteroscopy using adjustable electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Endourol 6: 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  14. Watson G, Murray S, Dretler SP, Parrish JA (1987) The pulsed dye laser for fragmenting urinary calculi. J Urol 138: 195–198

    Google Scholar 

  15. Watson G, Murray S, Dretler SP, Parrish JA (1987) An assessment of the pulsed dye laser for fragmenting calculi in the pig ureter. J Urol 138: 199–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vorreuther, R., Engelmann, Y. Evaluation of the shock-wave pattern for endoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Surg Endosc 9, 42–45 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187883

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187883

Key words

Navigation