Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic significance of lymph node reactivity in patients with laryngeal carcinoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Apart from the presence or absence of metastases in patients with laryngeal carcinoma, there are changes of reactivity in cervical lymph nodes that are seen histologically as nonspecific reactive lymphadenitis. These changes are morphological manifestations of the regional lymphatic system reactivity in relation to tumor, and their presence may be of prognostic value. To test this hypothesis, 45 patients with laryngeal carcinoma were examined for the evidence of node reactivity. The classification applied by Tsakraklides et al. was used, defining patterns of lymphocyte predominance, germinal center appearance (indicating lymph node stimulation) and whether or not lymphocyte depletion had occurred. The presence of node reactivity was compared with long-term (5-year) survivals in the group of patients studied. By applying statistical analysis it was found that lymph node stimulation was a favorable prognostic factor, while its absence worsened prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett SH, Futrell JW, Roth JA, Hoye RC, Ketcham AS (1971) Prognostic significance of histologic host response in cancer of the larynx or hypopharynx. Cancer 28: 1255–1265

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berlinger NT, Tsakraklides V, Pollak K, Adams GL, Yang M, Good RA (1976) Prognostic significance of lymph node histology in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx or oral cavity. Laryngoscope 86: 792–803

    Google Scholar 

  3. Black MM, Speer FD (1960) Lymph node reactivity in cancer patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 110: 477–487

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carr I (1980) The pathologist's role in interpreting metastatic lymph node disease. In: Weiss L, Gilbert HA, Ballon SC (eds) Lymphatic system metastasis. Hall, Boston, p 138

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferlito A, Polidoro F (1979) Biological and prognostic implications of the morphologic aspects of immune reaction in lymph nodes draining head neck cancers. J Laryngol Otol 93: 153–175

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hassman-Poznańska E, Musiatowicz B, Chodynicki S, Łazarczyk B (1984) Prognostic significance of the morphological findings of cervical lymph nodes in clinical course of laryngeal carcinoma. (in Polish). Otolaryngol Pol 38[Suppl]: 111–113

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hervy T, Jordan J, Kuczkowski J, Kowalska B (1989) Clinical and histological investigations of cervical lymph nodes in patients with laryngeal carcinoma. (in Polish). Otolaryngol Pok 43[Suppl]: 423–427

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madej M (1981) Lymph node reactions in laryngeal carcinoma. (in Polish). Ann Acad Med Stet 27: 253–266

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malicka K (1970) The assessment of defense function of lymph nodes on the basis of microscopical and clinical studies in laryngeal carcinoma. (in Polish). BTN Pr Wydz Nauk Przyr A14: 5–29

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sala O, Ferlito A (1976) Morphological observations of immunobiology of laryngeal cancer. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 81: 353–363

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tsakraklides V, Anastassiades OT, Kersey JH (1973) Prognostic significance of regional lymph node histology in uterine cervical cancer. Cancer 31: 860–868

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zoller M, Goodman ML, Cummings CW (1978) Guidelines for prognosis in head and neck cancer with nodal metastasis. Laryngoscope 88: 135–140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stankiewicz, C. Prognostic significance of lymph node reactivity in patients with laryngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 251, 418–422 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181968

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181968

Key words

Navigation