Skip to main content
Log in

Racial opportunity structures and black fertility

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops and tests hypotheses about the impact of opportunity structures on black fertility across local labor markets. US Vital Statistics and Census of Population data are combined and then examined with regression techniques to estimate the effect of both race-specific and relative measures of opportunity structure on black fertility in the United States. The results show that relative female opportunity structure has a negative relationship with black total fertility rates as well as with birth rates for specific points along the reproductive age structure. However, the hypothesized relationship between relative male opportunity structures and black fertility is not supported. We discuss these results as they relate to minority fertility theory and as they relate to public policy concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bean, F.D. & Swicegood, G. (1985). Mexican American fertility patterns. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F.D. & Marcum, J.P. (1978). Differential fertility and the minority group status hypothesis: An assessment and review, in: F.D. Bean & W.P. Frisbie (eds.), The demography of racial and ethnic groups, pp. 189–212. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsey, D.A., Kuh, E. & Welsch, R.E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billy, J.O.G. & Moore, D.E. (1992). A multilevel analysis of marital and nonmarital fertility in the US, Social Forces 70: 977–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. & Duncan, O.D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, J.A. (1995). Metropolitan social structure, labor markets, and fertility, Social Indicators Research (in press).

  • Burr, J.A. & Bean, F. (1994). Racial fertility differences: The role of female employment and education in wanted and unwanted childbearing. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Burr, J.A., Galle, O.R. & Fossett, M.A. (1991). Racial occupational inequality in southern metropolitan areas, 1940–1980: Revisiting the visibility-discrimination hypothesis, Social Forces 69: 831–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G.G. & Weininger, A. (1973). Economic determinants of fertility: Results from crosssectional aggregate data, Demography 10: 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G.G. & Dooley, M.D. (1976). Estimation of a model of labor supply, fertility, and wages of married women, Journal of Political Economy 84: 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W.S. & Devlin, S.J. (1988). Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting, Journal of the American Statistical Association 83: 596–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collver, O.A. (1968). Women's work participation and fertility in metropolitan areas, Demography 5: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, B. & Lieberson, S. (1970). Metropolis and region in transition. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A. (1968). Population, labor force, and long swings in economic growth: The American experience. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1980). Birth and fortune: The impact of numbers on personal welfare. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. (1984). Blacks and whites: Narrowing the gap? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. (1988). After the starting line: Blacks and women in an uphill race, Demography 25: 477–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. & Allen, W.R. (1987). The color line and the quality of life in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, M.A., Galle, O.R. & Kelly, W. (1986). Racial occupational inequality, 1940–1980: National and regional trends, American Sociological Review 51: 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, M.A. & Kiecolt, K.J. (1991). A methodological review of the sex ratio: Alternatives for comparative research, Journal of Marriage and the Family 53: 941–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. & Speare, A. Jr. (1988). Regional and metropolitan growth and decline in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, C. & Uhlenberg, P. (1969). Minority group status and fertility, American Journal of Sociology 74: 361–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D.S., II & Parcels, T.L. (1990). Revisiting metropolitan racial inequality: The case for a resource approach, Social Forces 68: 1121–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, D. & Boynton, J.W. (1970). A multivariate regression analysis of differences in fertility in US counties, Social Biology 17: 180–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D.P. & Kitagawa, E.M. (1985). The impact of social status, family structure, and neighborhood on the fertility of black adolescents, American Journal of Sociology 90: 825–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.E. (1979). Minority group status and the fertility of black Americans, 1970: A new look, American Journal of Sociology 84: 1386–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, J. & Billy, J.O.G. (1985). Social mobility and fertility, Annual Review of Sociology 11: 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K.C., McCall, P.L. & Cohen, L.E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and space, American Journal of Sociology 95: 922–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1975). Rank-sum comparisons between groups, pp. 276–91, in: K. Schuessler (ed.), Sociological research methods. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K.O. & Palan, V.T. (1981). Female employment and fertility in peninsular Malaysia: The maternal role incompatibility hypothesis reconsidered, Demography 18: 549–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, E.F. & Stamas, G.O. (1982). Usual weekly earnings: Another look at intergroup differences and basic trends, in: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Analyzing 1981 earnings data from the current population survey, pp. 15–24. September, Bulletin No. 2149.

  • National Center for Health Statistics (1984). Vital statistics of the United States, Vol. 1: Natality. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 85–110. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, P.N. (1975). The effect of minority group status on fertility: A re-examination of concepts, Population Studies 29: 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P.J. & Leroy, A.M. (1987). Robust regression and outlier detection. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shryock, H.S. & Siegel, J.S. (1976). The methods and materials of demography. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S.J. (1988). Sex ratios, economic power, and women's roles: A theoretical extension and empirical test, Journal of Marriage and the Family 50: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S.J. & Lloyd, K.M. (1992). Marriage markets and nonmarital fertility in the United States, Demography 29: 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenberg, R.M. & Waite, L.J. (1981). Labor market characteristics and the labor force participation of individuals. The Rand Paper Series, No. 6705.

  • Turchi, B. (1975). Microeconomic theories of fertility: A critique, Social Forces 54: 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census (1982). State and metropolitan area data book, 1982. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census (1983). Census of population and housing: Characteristics of the population (state volumes). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.K. (1979). The correlates of urban illegitimacy in the United States, 1960–1970, Journal of Marriage and the Family 41: 715–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W.J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Burr, J.A., Hartman, J. Racial opportunity structures and black fertility. Popul Res Policy Rev 15, 75–94 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156743

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156743

Key words

Navigation