Abstract
The patterns of government subsidies to higher education in France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (UK) are compared and contrasted. The subsidies are subsequently evaluated in the light of stated policy objectives, with particular attention to the objectives of efficiency and equity. Two extreme models of financing are considered; one in which public subsidy covers 100 per cent of the private costs of higher education, including income forgone by students, the other in which public subsidy to students is kept at a minimum. The study concludes that the ideal package from the standpoint of efficiency and equity is (1) a grants system in the last few years of secondary education; (2) a system of fees equal to about 30–50 per cent of institutional incomes and (3) an income contingent loan scheme (or graduate tax) for both undergraduate and postgraduate students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Conlisk, J. (1977). “A Further Look at the Hansen-Weisbrod-Pechman Debate”, Journal of Human Resources (Spring).
Council of Europe, Committee for Higher Education and Research (1976). Financial Aid to Students: Netherlands. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, mimeographed. (Report submitted by the Netherlands Ministry for Education and Science to 33rd Meeting, 12–14 May).
Council of Europe. (1977). News Letter. Strasbourg: Documentation Centre for Education in Europe, No. 2.
Crew, M., Young, A. (1977). Paying By Degrees. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Crowther-Hunt, Lord (1976). Times Higher Education Supplement (May 28).
Department of Education and Science (1970). Output Budgeting for the Department of Education and Science. Education Planning Paper No. 1. London: HMSO.
Department of Education and Science (1976a). University Grants Committee Annual Survey, Academic Year 1974–75. London: HMSO.
Department of Education and Science (1976b). Undergraduate Income and Spending. London: HMSO.
Department of Education and Science (1976c). Expenditure Committee: Government Observations on Third Report 1973–74. London: HMSO.
Duckenfield, M. (1977). “U68: Decentralised Decisions and an End to the Binary System,” Times Higher Education Supplement (May 13).
Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L. and Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic Background and Achievement. New York: Seminar Press.
Expenditure Committee of the House of Commons, Session 1973–4 (1973). Postgraduate Education. London: HMSO.
Gordon, A. (1976). “Trends in European Higher Education,” Higher Education Bulletin (Winter).
Government of the Netherlands (1976). Contours of a Future Education System in the Netherlands. The Hague: Government of the Netherlands.
Levy-Garboua, L. (1975). “La justice distributive de l'école,” Consommation: Annales du CREDOC (Centre de Recherche pour l'Etude et l'Observation des Conditions de Vie), No. 2.
Levy-Garboua, L. (1977). “Les dépenses d'enseignement en France,” Educational Expenditure in France, Japan and the U.K. Paris: OECD.
Maynard, A. (1975). Experiment with Choice in Education. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Miklius, W. (1975). “The Distributional Effects of Public Higher Education: A Comment,” Higher Education, 4: 351–355.
Miller, H. P. (1966). Income Distribution in the United States. A 1960 Census Monograph. Washington, D. C.: US Government Printing Office.
Mingat, A. (1977). Essai sur la demande de l'éducation. Thèse présentée le 12 novembre, 1977, à l'Université de Dijon. Dijon: Université de Dijon, Faculté de science économique et de gestion, mimeographed.
National Board of Universities and Colleges (1976). The National Swedish Board of Universities and Colleges: A New Government Agency. Stockholm: U.H.A. (Universitetsoch Högskoleämberet).
National Center for Education Statistics (1976). The Condition of Education 1976 edition. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office for the National Center for Education Statistics.
OECD (1972). Educational Policy and Planning: Germany. Paris: OECD.
OECD (1975). Education, Inequality and Life Chances. Paris: OECD.
Orivel, F. (1975). “Origines et objectifs du système Francais d'aide aux étudiants,” L'aide aux étudiants en France: faits et critique. Dijon: Institut de recherche sur l'économie de l'éducation (IREDU), Université de Dijon, mimeographed.
Orivel, F. (1977). Côut et financement de l'enseignement supérieur. (A summary of part of a doctoral thesis presented in 1975 to the University of Dijon by B. Millot and F. Orivel, L'Allocation des ressources dans l'enseignement supérieur Francais: evaluation et rationalité). Dijon: IREDU, mimeographed.
Paichaud, D. (1975). “The Economics of Educational Opportunity,” Higher Education, 4: 201–212.
Pratt, J. (1975). “The UGC Department,” Higher Education Review (Spring).
Prest, A. R. (1966). Financing University Education. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Ritzen, J. M. M., Pommer, E. J., Roelse, W. and Ruitenberg, L. W. (1977). Profijt van de Overheid (Benefits from Government). The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
Roeloffs, K. (1976). Financial Aid to Students in Germany. Paris: OECD, mimeographed.
Rudd, E. (1975). “Parents Should Not be Forced to Pay,” Times Higher Education Supplement (October 24).
Rudd, E. (1977). “Student Grants: No Worse, But Little Better,” Times Higher Education Supplement, (June 10).
Swärd, G., Larsson, J., Persson, R. and Gesser, B. (1968). Studentekonomiska undersökningen 1968 (Student Finance Investigation 1968). Lund: Lunds Universitet, Sociologiska Institutionen.
Verry, D. (1977a). “Financial Incentives and Efficiency in Education,” Open University Course ED 322, Economics and Education Policy, Block III, The Internal Efficiency of Educational Institutions. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.
Verry, D. (1977b). “Some Distributional and Equity Aspects of the Student Loans Debate,” Open University Course ED 322, Block V, Education, Equity and Income Distribution. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.
Williams, G. (1974). “The Events of 1973–4 in a Long Term Planning Perspective,” Higher Education Bulletin (Autumn).
Woodhall, M. (1970). Student Loans: A Review of Experience in Scandinavia and Elsewhere. London: Harrap Publishing Co.
Woodhall, M. (1978). Review of Student Support Schemes in Selected OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research for this paper was sponsored by the United States Education Policy Research Center for Higher Education and Society under HEW Contract No. 300-76-0026. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Center. Our thanks are due to J. Froomkin for valuable comments on an earlier draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blaug, M., Woodhall, M. Patterns of subsidies to higher education in Europe. High Educ 7, 331–361 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139530
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139530