Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of subsidies to higher education in Europe

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The patterns of government subsidies to higher education in France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (UK) are compared and contrasted. The subsidies are subsequently evaluated in the light of stated policy objectives, with particular attention to the objectives of efficiency and equity. Two extreme models of financing are considered; one in which public subsidy covers 100 per cent of the private costs of higher education, including income forgone by students, the other in which public subsidy to students is kept at a minimum. The study concludes that the ideal package from the standpoint of efficiency and equity is (1) a grants system in the last few years of secondary education; (2) a system of fees equal to about 30–50 per cent of institutional incomes and (3) an income contingent loan scheme (or graduate tax) for both undergraduate and postgraduate students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Conlisk, J. (1977). “A Further Look at the Hansen-Weisbrod-Pechman Debate”, Journal of Human Resources (Spring).

  • Council of Europe, Committee for Higher Education and Research (1976). Financial Aid to Students: Netherlands. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, mimeographed. (Report submitted by the Netherlands Ministry for Education and Science to 33rd Meeting, 12–14 May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (1977). News Letter. Strasbourg: Documentation Centre for Education in Europe, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M., Young, A. (1977). Paying By Degrees. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther-Hunt, Lord (1976). Times Higher Education Supplement (May 28).

  • Department of Education and Science (1970). Output Budgeting for the Department of Education and Science. Education Planning Paper No. 1. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (1976a). University Grants Committee Annual Survey, Academic Year 1974–75. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (1976b). Undergraduate Income and Spending. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (1976c). Expenditure Committee: Government Observations on Third Report 1973–74. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckenfield, M. (1977). “U68: Decentralised Decisions and an End to the Binary System,” Times Higher Education Supplement (May 13).

  • Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L. and Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic Background and Achievement. New York: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Expenditure Committee of the House of Commons, Session 1973–4 (1973). Postgraduate Education. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (1976). “Trends in European Higher Education,” Higher Education Bulletin (Winter).

  • Government of the Netherlands (1976). Contours of a Future Education System in the Netherlands. The Hague: Government of the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy-Garboua, L. (1975). “La justice distributive de l'école,” Consommation: Annales du CREDOC (Centre de Recherche pour l'Etude et l'Observation des Conditions de Vie), No. 2.

  • Levy-Garboua, L. (1977). “Les dépenses d'enseignement en France,” Educational Expenditure in France, Japan and the U.K. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, A. (1975). Experiment with Choice in Education. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklius, W. (1975). “The Distributional Effects of Public Higher Education: A Comment,” Higher Education, 4: 351–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. P. (1966). Income Distribution in the United States. A 1960 Census Monograph. Washington, D. C.: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingat, A. (1977). Essai sur la demande de l'éducation. Thèse présentée le 12 novembre, 1977, à l'Université de Dijon. Dijon: Université de Dijon, Faculté de science économique et de gestion, mimeographed.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board of Universities and Colleges (1976). The National Swedish Board of Universities and Colleges: A New Government Agency. Stockholm: U.H.A. (Universitetsoch Högskoleämberet).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (1976). The Condition of Education 1976 edition. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office for the National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1972). Educational Policy and Planning: Germany. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1975). Education, Inequality and Life Chances. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orivel, F. (1975). “Origines et objectifs du système Francais d'aide aux étudiants,” L'aide aux étudiants en France: faits et critique. Dijon: Institut de recherche sur l'économie de l'éducation (IREDU), Université de Dijon, mimeographed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orivel, F. (1977). Côut et financement de l'enseignement supérieur. (A summary of part of a doctoral thesis presented in 1975 to the University of Dijon by B. Millot and F. Orivel, L'Allocation des ressources dans l'enseignement supérieur Francais: evaluation et rationalité). Dijon: IREDU, mimeographed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paichaud, D. (1975). “The Economics of Educational Opportunity,” Higher Education, 4: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (1975). “The UGC Department,” Higher Education Review (Spring).

  • Prest, A. R. (1966). Financing University Education. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzen, J. M. M., Pommer, E. J., Roelse, W. and Ruitenberg, L. W. (1977). Profijt van de Overheid (Benefits from Government). The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeloffs, K. (1976). Financial Aid to Students in Germany. Paris: OECD, mimeographed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, E. (1975). “Parents Should Not be Forced to Pay,” Times Higher Education Supplement (October 24).

  • Rudd, E. (1977). “Student Grants: No Worse, But Little Better,” Times Higher Education Supplement, (June 10).

  • Swärd, G., Larsson, J., Persson, R. and Gesser, B. (1968). Studentekonomiska undersökningen 1968 (Student Finance Investigation 1968). Lund: Lunds Universitet, Sociologiska Institutionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verry, D. (1977a). “Financial Incentives and Efficiency in Education,” Open University Course ED 322, Economics and Education Policy, Block III, The Internal Efficiency of Educational Institutions. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verry, D. (1977b). “Some Distributional and Equity Aspects of the Student Loans Debate,” Open University Course ED 322, Block V, Education, Equity and Income Distribution. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (1974). “The Events of 1973–4 in a Long Term Planning Perspective,” Higher Education Bulletin (Autumn).

  • Woodhall, M. (1970). Student Loans: A Review of Experience in Scandinavia and Elsewhere. London: Harrap Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhall, M. (1978). Review of Student Support Schemes in Selected OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research for this paper was sponsored by the United States Education Policy Research Center for Higher Education and Society under HEW Contract No. 300-76-0026. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Center. Our thanks are due to J. Froomkin for valuable comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blaug, M., Woodhall, M. Patterns of subsidies to higher education in Europe. High Educ 7, 331–361 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139530

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139530

Keywords

Navigation