Abstract
Management development is a relatively recent concern in Australian higher education. Historically, management of colleges was deemphasized; instead, a gentlemen's approach to academic governance has predominated. Recently, as a result of an emerging administrative crisis, colleges and universities have started experimenting with new approaches to management. This article explores the applicability of a general management development model to the Australian context. The model, which identifies a dynamic relationship between the structural characteristics of an institution and its management needs, was developed from research on American colleges and universities. Based on the analysis of three case studies the model appears applicable to the Australian setting, especially for large and complex institutions which confront simultaneous pressures to develop the planning and management capability in basic units, and to increase coordination and planning at the institutional level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balderston, F. E. (1974). Managing Today's University. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Baldridge, J. V. and Tierney, M. C. (1979). New Approaches to Management: Creating Practical Systems of Management Information and Management by Objectives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Becher, T. and Kogan, M. (1980). Process and Structure in Higher Education. London: Heinemann.
Cheit, E. F. (1971). The New Depression in Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cheit, E. F. (1973). The New Depression in Higher Education - 2 Years Later. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Clark, B. R. (1977). “Changing Relations Between Higher Education and Government: Some Perspectives from Abroad,” Yale Higher Education Research Group, Working Paper, New Haven, Conn., YHERG 21.
Clarke, A. M. and Edwards, L. M. (1979). “Some current issues in the administration of Australian universities,” Higher Education 8: 491–512.
Goldschmidt, D. (1978). “Systems of Higher Education” in J. H. Van de Graaff et al. (eds.), Academic Power: Patterns of Authority in Seven National Systems of Higher Education. New York: Praeger.
Franklin, P. A. and McCaig, R. (1978). “Academic drift in tertiary education,” Journal of Educational Administration 17(2): 259–262.
Kerr, C. et al. (1978). 12 Systems: 6 Decisive Issues. New York: International Council for Educational Development.
Lee, E. L. and Bowen, F. M. (1975). Managing Multi-Campus Systems: Effective Administration in an Unsteady State. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Millet, J. D. (1978). “Planning and Management in National Structures” in C. Kerr et al. (eds.), 12 Systems: 6 Decisive Issues, New York International Council for Educational Development.
Schoemaker, P. J. (1980). Experiments of Decisions Under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
St. John, E. P. (1980). “A MIS development framework for higher education,” Cause/Effect 3(4): 24–32.
St. John, E. P. (1981). Public Policy and College Management: Title III of the Higher Education Act. New York: Praeger.
St. John, E. P. (1982). “Federal state tensions marks recent changes in educational policy in Australia,” Change 14(8): 52–57.
St. John, E. P. and McCaig, R. (eds.) (1982). Case Studies in Higher Education Policy and Management. Armidale, NSW, Australia: University of New England, Institute of Higher Education, Monograph No: 1982/2.
St. John, E. P. and Weathersby, G. B. (1980). “Management development in higher education: Strategies for developing colleges and universities,” International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 4(2): 105–119.
Van de Graaff, J. H. et al. (eds.) (1978). Academic Power and Patterns of Authority in Seven National Systems of Higher Education. New York: Praeger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
St. John, E.P., McCaig, R. Management development in Australian colleges and universities. High Educ 13, 619–634 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137016
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137016