Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence of a crossability barrier in diploid x hexaploid and diploid x octoploid crosses in the genus Fragaria

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A large number of diploid x hexaploid and diploid x octoploid crosses have been made by numerous workers with poor results. Crosses between synthetic tetraploids and species of higher levels of ploidy were successful. The success of these crosses and the high incidence of pentaploid progeny obtained by other workers from successful diploid x hexaploid crosses indicates that chromosomal or genetic imbalance in the endosperm or between zygote and endosperm is most likely the cause of failure to produce viable plants from 2x x 6x and 2x x 8x crosses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, R. W., 1960. Principles of plant breeding. John Wiley, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogadkina, N. A., 1941. A contribution to the question of genome relations in some species of Fragaria. C.r. Acad. Sci. URSS. 30: 166–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. D. & J. K. Jones, 1967. Incompatibility in Fragaria. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 9: 831–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorova, N. J., 1934. Polyploid intespecific hybrids in the genus Fragaria. Genetica 16: 524–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichijima, K., 1930. Studies on the genetics of Fragaria. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre. 55: 300–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, F. A., 1933. Karyologische und genetische Studien an Fragaria. I. Ein tetraploider fertiler Bastard zwischen F. nipponica (n=7) und F. elatior (n=21). Jap. J. Bot. 6: 425–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, F. A., 1936. Karyologische und genetische Studien an Fragaria. II. Ist Fragaria elatior eine autopolyploide Pflanze? Jap. J. Bot. 8: 119–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, A. J. & E. M. East, 1927. Studies on the genetics of Fragaria. Genetics 12: 307–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millardet, M. A., 1894. Note sur l'hybridization sans croisement ou fausse hybridation. Mém. Soc. Sci. phys. nat. Bordeaux 4: 347–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müntzing, A., 1930. Über Chromosomenvermehrung in Galeopsis-Kreuzungen unde ihre phytogenetische Bedeutung. Hereditas 14: 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemann, E., 1937. Artkreuzungen bei Fragaria. II. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre. 73: 375–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemann, E., 1943. Artkreuzungen bei Fragaria. III. Flora, Jena 37: 166–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemann, E., 1951. Offene Fragen in der Gattung Fragaria. Z. PflZücht. 30: 464–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, S. G., 1942. Colchicine-produced polyploids in Gossypium. J. Genet. 44: 272–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. P., 1930. Causes of differences in success of reciprocal interspecific crosses. Am. Nat. 64: 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell, S. H., 1931. Genetic and cytological studies on Fragaria. Genetics 16: 422–454.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, W.D. Evidence of a crossability barrier in diploid x hexaploid and diploid x octoploid crosses in the genus Fragaria . Euphytica 23, 95–100 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032746

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032746

Keywords

Navigation