Skip to main content
Log in

Machine Learning-Based Water Management Strategies for Sustainable Groundwater Resources

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater resources are under increasing pressure, nevertheless, as a result of population growth, climate change, and overuse. Accurate estimates of groundwater levels are essential for the management of water resources to be sustainable. Deep learning algorithms have the potential to enhance groundwater level prediction by extracting complex patterns from the previous data. In recent years, groundwater level forecasting using deep learning has received increasing attention. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a common deep learning technique for predicting groundwater levels. Since RNNs are capable of learning long-range dependencies in the data, they are well suited for time-series prediction problems. Utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is an additional strategy. CNNs are frequently employed for tasks such as segmenting and classifying images, but they may also be used to predict time series. CNNs are capable of effectively identifying spatial patterns in the data, which can be helpful for predicting groundwater levels. Numerous researches have shown that groundwater level prediction models based on deep learning produce promising outcomes. But there are still some issues that need to be resolved, such as the requirement for a substantial amount of training data and the complexity of deciphering the output of deep learning models. Overall, deep learning is a promising new strategy for predicting groundwater levels. Future groundwater level prediction algorithms should become progressively more precise and trustworthy as deep learning techniques in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The dataset generated and analyzed throughout this study can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author. Requests for access to the dataset will be considered on a reasonable basis to facilitate further research and collaboration.

References

  1. Morgenroth J, Perras MA, Khan UT. A convolutional neural network approach for predicting tunnel liner yield at cigar lake mine. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 2021;55(5):2821–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang K, Lyu HM, Shen SL, Zhou A, Yin ZY. Evolutionary hybrid neural network approach to predict shield tunneling-induced ground settlements. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 2020;106:103594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rohde MM, Biswas T, Housman IW, Campbell LS, Klausmeyer KR, Howard JK. A machine learning approach to predict groundwater levels in California reveals ecosystems at risk. Front Earth Sci. 2021;9:784499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wunsch A, Liesch T, Broda S. Groundwater level forecasting with artificial neural networks: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and non-linear autoregressive networks with exogenous input (NARX). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2021;25(3):1671–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. KardanMoghaddam H, Ghordoyee Milan S, Kayhomayoon Z, Rahimzadehkivi Z, Arya Azar N. The prediction of aquifer groundwater level based on spatial clustering approach using machine learning. Environ Monit Assess. 2021;193:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin H, Gharehbaghi A, Zhang Q, Band SS, Pai HT, Chau KW, Mosavi A. Time series-based groundwater level forecasting using gated recurrent unit deep neural networks. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 2022;16(1):1655–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kayhomayoon Z, Babaeian F, Ghordoyee Milan S, Arya Azar N, Berndtsson R. A combination of metaheuristic optimization algorithms and machine learning methods improves the prediction of groundwater level. Water. 2022;14(5):751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raheja H, Goel A, Pal M. Prediction of groundwater quality indices using machine learning algorithms. Water Pract Technol. 2022;17(1):336–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller J, Park J, Sahu R, Varadharajan C, Arora B, Faybishenko B, Agarwal D. Surrogate optimization of deep neural networks for groundwater predictions. J Global Optim. 2021;81:203–31.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kayhomayoon Z, Azar NA, Milan SG, Moghaddam HK, Berndtsson R. Novel approach for predicting groundwater storage loss using machine learning. J Environ Manage. 2021;296:113237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Osman AIA, Ahmed AN, Chow MF, Huang YF, El-Shafie A. Extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) model to predict the groundwater levels in Selangor Malaysia. Ain Shams Eng J. 2021;12(2):1545–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malekzadeh M, Kardar S, Saeb K, Shabanlou S, Taghavi L. A novel approach for prediction of monthly ground water level using a hybrid wavelet and non-tuned self-adaptive machine learning model. Water Resour Manage. 2019;33:1609–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gharehbaghi A, Ghasemlounia R, Ahmadi F, Albaji M. Groundwater level prediction with meteorologically sensitive gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural networks. J Hydrol. 2022;612:128262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosavi A, SajediHosseini F, Choubin B, Goodarzi M, Dineva AA, RafieiSardooi E. Ensemble boosting and bagging based machine learning models for groundwater potential prediction. Water Resour Manage. 2021;35:23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dataset collection:https://www.kaggle.com/code/tuhinssam/india-ground-water-exploratory-data-analysis/input.

  16. Kløve B, Allan A, Bertrand G, Druzynska E, Ertürk A, Goldscheider N, Schipper P. Groundwater dependent ecosystems. Part II Ecosystem services and management in Europe under risk of climate change and land use intensification. Environ Sci Policy. 2011;14(7):782–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon H, Hyun Y, Ha K, Lee KK, Kim GB. A method to improve the stability and accuracy of ANN-and SVM-based time series models for long-term groundwater level predictions. Comput Geosci. 2016;90:144–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ali ASA, Ebrahimi S, Ashiq MM, Alasta MS, Azari B. CNN-Bi LSTM neural network for simulating groundwater level. Environ Eng. 2022;8:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Valadkhan D, Moghaddasi R, Mohammadinejad A. Groundwater quality prediction based on LSTM RNN: an Iranian experience. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2022;19(11):11397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Supreetha BS, Shenoy N, Nayak P. Lion algorithm-optimized long short-term memory network for groundwater level forecasting in Udupi District, India. Appl Comput Intell Soft Comput. 2020;2020:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Afan HA, Ibrahem Ahmed Osman A, Essam Y, Ahmed AN, Huang YF, Kisi O, Sherif M, Sefelnasr A, Chau KW, El-Shafie A. Modeling the fluctuations of groundwater level by employing ensemble deep learning techniques. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 2021;15(1):1420–39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tao H, Hameed MM, Marhoon HA, Zounemat-Kermani M, Heddam S, Kim S, Yaseen ZM. Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: a comprehensive review. Neurocomputing. 2022;489:271–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar R, Dwivedi SB, Gaur S. A comparative study of machine learning and Fuzzy-AHP technique to groundwater potential mapping in the data-scarce region. Comput Geosci. 2021;155:104855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kayalvizhi S, Jiavana KFK, Suganthi K, Malarvizhi S. Prediction of ground water quality in western regions of Tamil Nadu using deep auto encoders. Urban Climate. 2023;49:101458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledged the KLS Gogte Institute of Technology and Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India, for supporting the research work by providing the facilities.

Funding

No funding received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This research endeavor owes its success to the collaborative efforts and valuable contributions of all authors involved. Their collective dedication and expertise have played a crucial role in advancing the scope and depth of this study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shubha G. Sanu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Advances in Computational Approaches for Image Processing, Wireless Networks, Cloud Applications and Network Security” guest edited by P. Raviraj, Maode Ma and Roopashree H R.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanu, S.G., Math, M.M. Machine Learning-Based Water Management Strategies for Sustainable Groundwater Resources. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 338 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-02686-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-02686-8

Keywords

Navigation