Abstract
The active power loss allocation of a radial distribution system faces numerous challenges due to deregulation of power supply. The huge penetrations of distributed generators (DGs) result reverse current in the network, which leads to complexity in cross-term decomposition and power loss allocation. Further, the system loss may decrease/increase due to penetration of DGs into the system. The distribution of this reduced/enhanced portion of losses among the end-users again brings complications in the radial distribution network (RDN) loss allocation. In light of above issues, this paper formulates a circuit theory based branch oriented LA algorithm which removes the impact of mutual terms analytically from the loss equation without any assumptions and approximations. This method allocates losses to the load points in the presence/absence of DG units with due respect to their load demands, power factors and positions in the power network. Moreover, a new DG remuneration scheme has been developed from the power loss equation which provides all the benefits of network loss reduction only to the DG owners in terms of incentives/penalties after analyzing their real impact towards RDN loss reduction. This technique is further extended to investigate the response as regard to energy loss allocation and load power factor variation keeping in view to practical field of application. The performance with respect to different load factors and DG power injections are also investigated using two test distribution systems i.e., IEEE-28 and 30 bus test systems. The comparative result obtained highlights effectiveness of the developed procedure against other existing procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \(k\) :
-
Bus Number
- \(nb\) :
-
Total number of buses in the network
- \(xy\) :
-
Branch number
- \(nbr\) :
-
Total number of branches in the system
- \(SN\left( {xy} \right)\) :
-
Array containing subsequent buses of a branch-\(xy\)
- \(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\) :
-
Subsequent node of a branch-\(xy\), for \(k\,\,\varepsilon \,\,SN\left( {xy} \right)\)
- \(I\left( {xy} \right)\) :
-
Current of branch-\(xy\)
- \(I\left( {n\left( {xy,k} \right)} \right)\) :
-
Load current of the subsequent consumer connected at node-\(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\)
- \(V_{{n\left( {xy,k} \right)}}\) :
-
Voltage of the consumer connected at node-\(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\)
- \(I_{k}\) :
-
Equivalent current injection at \(k^{th}\) node
- \(V_{k}\) :
-
Voltage at \(k^{th}\) node
- \(Sloss\left( {xy} \right)\) :
-
Apparent power of the branch-\(xy\)
- \(P_{Lk} + jQ_{Lk}\) :
-
Complex power load connected at node-\(k\)
- \(P_{gk} + jQ_{gk}\) :
-
Complex power injected by DG connected at node-\(k\)
- \(P_{k} + jQ_{k}\) :
-
Net power injection at node-\(k\)
- \(Ploss\left( {xy} \right)\) :
-
Real power loss of the branch-\(xy\)
- \(Qloss\left( {xy} \right)\) :
-
Reactive power loss of the branch-\(xy\)
- \(Tploss\) :
-
Total real power loss of the network
- \(In(dg(k))\) :
-
Total loss share of the DG unit which is connected at node-\(k\)
- \(TIn\) :
-
Total estimated value of remuneration awarded to the DG owners (DGOs)
- \(In_{exact}\) :
-
Exact amount of remuneration allocated to the DGOs
- \(In_{diff}\) :
-
Difference between the estimated and true value of DG remuneration
- \(P_{L} (xy,n(xy,k))\) :
-
Active power load at node-\(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\)
- \(Q_{L} (xy,n(xy,k))\) :
-
Reactive power load at node-\(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\)
- \(P_{g} (xy,n(xy,k))\) :
-
DG injected active power at node-\(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\)
- \(Q_{g} (xy,n(xy,k))\) :
-
DG injected reactive power at node-\(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\)
- \(*\) :
-
Represents conjugate of a complex number
- \(>\) :
-
Used for representing one quantity is more than that of other quantity
- \(In(xy,dg(n(xy,k)))\) :
-
Loss share of DG unit connected at node-\(k\), for loss reduction of branch-\(xy\)
- \(Ploss\left( {xy,n\,(xy,k)} \right)\) :
-
Active power loss of branch-\(xy\) which is allocated to load point at node-\(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\)
- \(Sloss\left( {xy,n(xy,k)} \right)\) :
-
Apparent power loss of branch-\(xy\) which is allocated to load point at node\(n\left( {xy,k} \right)\)
References
Atanasovski M, Taleski R (2011) Power summation method for loss allocation in radial distribution networks with DG. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26:2491–2499
Atanasovski M, Taleski R (2012) Energy summation method for loss allocation in radial distribution networks with DG. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27:1433–1440
Bialek JW (1997) Topological generation and load distribution factors for supplement charge allocation in transmission open access. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12:1185–1193
Carpaneto E, Chicco G, Akilimali JS (2006a) Branch current decomposition method for loss allocation in radial distribution systems with distributed generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21:1170–1179
Carpaneto E, Chicco G, & Akilimali JS (2006) Computational aspects of the marginal loss allocation methods for distribution systems with distributed generation. Proc IEEE MELECON. Benelmadena (Malaga), Spain. pp. 1028–1031
Conejo AJ, Galiana FD, Kochar I (2001) Z-bus loss allocation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16:105–110
Costa PM, Matos MA (2004) Loss allocation in distribution networks with embedded generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19:384–389
Exposito AG, Santos JMR, Garcia TG, Velasco EAR (2000) Fair allocation of transmission power losses. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15:184–188
Fang WL, Ngan HW (2002) Succinct method for allocation of network losses. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 149:171–174
Galiana FD, Conejo AJ, Kockar I (2002) Incremental transmission loss allocation under pool dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17:26–33
Ghofrani-Jahromi Z, Mahmoodzadeh Z, Ehsan M (2014) Distribution loss allocation for radial systems including DGs. IEEE Trans Power Del 29:72–80
Gonzalez JJ, & Basagoiti P (1999) Spanish power exchange market and information system. Design concepts, and operating experience. In: Proceedings of 1999 IEEE power industry computer applications conference. pp 245–252
Hota AP, Mishra S (2020a) A forward-backward sweep based numerical approach for active power loss allocation of radial distribution network with distributed generations. Int J Numer Model Electron Netw Devices Fields Wiley 34(1):2788. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnm.2788
Hota AP, Mishra S (2020b) Loss allocation in distribution networks with distributed generators undergoing network reconfiguration. Int J Electrical Comput Eng 10(4):3375–3383
Hota AP, Mishra S, Mishra DP (2020) Loss allocation strategies in active power distribution networks: a review. In: Pradhan G, Morris S, Nayak N (eds) Advances in electrical control and signal systems. Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 665. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5262-5_68
Jagtap KM, Khatod DK (2015) Loss allocation in radial distribution networks with different load models and distributed generations. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9:1275–1291
Jagtap KM, Khatod DK (2017) Novel approach for loss allocation of distribution networks with DGs. Electr Power Syst Res 143:303–311
Kashyap SS, De M (2017) Loss allocation and loss minimisation for radial distribution system including DGs. IET Renew Power Gener 11:806–818
Khosravi M, Monsef H, Aliabadi MH (2018) Loss allocation in distribution network including distributed energy resources (DERs). Int Trans Electric Energy Syst 28:e2548
Kirschen D, Allan R, Strbac G (1997) Contributions of individual generators to loads and flows. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12:52–60
Kumar P, Gupta N, Niazi KR, Swarnkar A (2018) A circuit theory-based loss allocation method for active distribution systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10:1005–1012
Kumar P, Gupta N, Niazi KR, Swarnkar A (2018) A cross-term decomposition method for loss allocation in distribution systems considering load power factor. Electric Power Compon Syst 46:218–229
Kumar P, Gupta N, Niazi KR, Swarnkar A (2017) Current decomposition method for loss allocation in distribution systems. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11:4599–4607
Mishra S, Das D, & Paul S (2010) A simple algorithm for distribution system load flow with distributed generation. In: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering. Jaipur, India. 1–5
Mishra S, Das D, Paul S (2017) A comprehensive review on power distribution network reconfiguration. Energy Syst 8:227–284
Molina YP, Prada RB, Saavedra OR (2010) Complex losses allocation to generators and loads based on circuit theory and aumann-shapley method. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25:1928–1936
Mutale J, Strbac G, Curcic S, Jenkins N (2000) Allocation of losses in distribution systems with embedded generation. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 147:7–14
Naik SNG, Khatod DK (2015) Analytical approach for optimal siting and sizing of distributed generation in radial distribution networks. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9:209–220
Peng JC, Jiang H, Song YH (2007) A weakly conditioned imputation of an impedance-branch dissipation power. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22:2124–2133
Savier JS, Das D (2009) Energy loss allocation in radial distribution systems: a comparison of practical algorithms. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 24:260–267
Sharma S, Abhyankar AR (2016) Loss allocation for weakly meshed distribution system using analytical formulation of shapley value. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32:1369–1377
Usman M, Coppo M, Bignucolo F, Turri R, Cerretti A (2019) A novel methodology for the management of distribution network based on neutral losses allocation factors. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 110:613–622
Funding
The authors declare that no funding has been received for this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hota, A.P., Mishra, S. & Mishra, D.P. Power/energy loss allocation in deregulated power distribution system with load factor and load power factor variation. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 13, 250–266 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01227-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01227-3