Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Lesbian Family Life

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between marriage equality and its impact on parenting and committed monogamous relationships for lesbian women. Specifically, this study aims to explore how marriage equality, or the lack thereof, affects the daily lives of 21 lesbian mothers in 6 states across the United States. Following an examination of the discourse surrounding same-sex marriage, research on lesbian family dynamics is discussed. Notably, how marriage equality or lack thereof matters in the lives of lesbian families necessarily includes attention to the day-to-day experiences in such families. Narratives from this study illustrate that for this sample of lesbian mothers issues of guardianship are most salient. Moreover, that attainment of legal marriage does not assuage these hardships. Results and implications are discussed within the framework of legal consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agar, M. (1986). Speaking of ethnography. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412985895.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. R., & Demo, D. H. (1995). The families of lesbians and gay men: A new frontier in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 111–127. doi:10.2307/353821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., & Kane, J. B. (2011). Life course pathways and the psychosocial adjustment of young adult women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 279–295. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00804.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bengston, V. L., & Allen, K. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families over time. Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods. Blacksburg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, J. D. (1967). The origin of life. Cleveland: Word. doi:10.1126/science.166.3913.1613-b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biblarz, T. J., & Stacey, J. (2010). How does the gender of parents matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(1), 3–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K. (2014). Family policy matters: How policymaking affects families and what professionals can do (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203753200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L., & Hsien-Hen, L. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 54(1), 29–41. doi:10.1080/713779060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burn, S. M. (2005). Women across cultures: A global perspective (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, E. S. (2009). The social construction of marital commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 318–336. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00601.x.

  • Card, C. (1996). Against marriage and motherhood. Hypatia, 11(3), 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01013.x.

  • Case, M. A. (1993). Couples and coupling in the public sphere: a comment on the legal history of litigating for lesbian and gay rights. Virginia Law Review, 79, 1643–1694. doi:10.2307/1073383.

  • Chambers, D. L. (1996). What if? The legal consequences of marriage and the legal needs of lesbian and gay male couples. Michigan Law Review, 95, 447–491. doi:10.2307/1290119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. B., Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2015). Windsor and Perry: Reactions of Siblings in Same-Sex and Heterosexual Couples. Journal of Homosexuality, 62, 993–1008. doi:10.1080/00918369.2015.1039360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V. (2003). Lesbian and gay marriage: Transformation or normalization? Feminism and Psychology, 13(4), 519–529. doi:10.1177/09593535030134016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage: A history. London: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–131. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2003). Family theory versus the theories families live by. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(4), 771–784. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00771.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFrain, J., & Asay, S. M. (2007). Strong families around the world: An introduction to the family strengths perspective. Marriage & Family Review, 4(1/2), 1–10. doi:10.1300/J002v41n01_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Onofrio, B. M., & Lahey, B. B. (2010). Biosocial influences on the family: a decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 762–782. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00729.x.

  • Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science: Liberation and its limits. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2006). Designing qualitative research (Thousand Oaks). CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M., & Vasconcelos, E. F. S. (2010). Critical social theory: Core tenets, inherent issues. In M. Freedman (Ed.), Critical social theory and evaluation practice: New directions for evaluation (127th ed., pp. 7–19). doi:10.1002/ev.335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. (2001). Changing legal consciousness in America: the view from the joke corpus. Cardozo Law Review, 23, 2223–2240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E., & Kuvalanka, K. A. (2012). Marriage (in) equality: The perspectives of adolescents and emerging adults with lesbian, gay, and bisexual parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 34–52. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00876.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2006). Science and social inequality: Feminist and postcolonial issues. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

  • Hareven, T. K. (1987). Family history at the crossroads. Journal of Family History, 12(3), 9–23. doi:10.1016/S1081-602X(99)80245-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. C. M. (1983). Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hequembourg, A. L., & Farrell, M. P. (1999). Lesbian motherhood. Gender and Society, 13(4), 540–557. doi:10.1177/089124399013004007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homfray, M. (2008). Standpoint, objectivity, and social construction: Reflections from the study of gay and lesbian communities. Sociological Research Online, 13(1), 7. 10/5153/sro.1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. J., Sorensen, A., & Taylor, V. (2013). Same‐sex couples, families, and marriage: embracing and resisting heteronormativity1. Sociology Compass, 7(2), 97–110. doi:10.1111/soc4.12016.

  • Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(6), 1–10. Retrieved from:http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss42/3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, S., & Burkard, A. (2009). Qualitative research interviews. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4/5), 20–39. doi:10.1080/10503300802702105

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M. (Ed.). (2006). Theoretical models of human development. Volume 1 of Handbook of Child Psychology (6th ed.), Editors-in-chief: W. Damon & R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Lewis, G. B., & Gossett, C. W. (2008). Changing public opinion on same‐sex marriage: the case of California. Politics and Policy, 36(1), 4–30. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic Inquiry, 289331. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

  • Manning, W. D., & Cohen, J. A. (2012). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution: An examination of recent marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(2), 377–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00960.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nadin, S., & Cassell, C. (2006). The use of a research diary as a tool for reflexive practice: Some reflections from management research. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 3(3), 208–217. doi:10.1108/11766090610705407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naples, N. A. (2003). Feminism and method: Ethnography, discourse analysis, and activist research. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315889245

  • Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695–705. Retrieved from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/ortlipp.pdf .

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, R. F., & Kuvalanka, K. A. (2008). Same-sex couples: Legal complexities. Journal of Family Issues. doi:10.1177/0192513X08316274.

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J. (2000a). Children of lesbian and gay men. Child Development, 63(5), 1025–1042. doi:10.2307/113151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J. (2000b). Family relationships of lesbians and gay men. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1052–1069. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01052.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J. (2005). In: Lesbian and Gay Parenting. American Psychological Association. Washington D.C.: Routledge. Lesbian and gay parents and their children: Summary of research findings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J. (2009). Children of lesbian and gay parents: Psychology, law, and policy. American Psychologist, 64(8), 727–736. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.64.8.727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlesz, A., Brown, R., Lindsay, J., McNair, R., deVaus, D., & Pitts, M. (2006). Family in transition: Parents, children, and grandparents in lesbian families give meaning to ‘doing family.’. Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 175–199. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2006.00345.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortman, A. R., & Mills, M. (2012). Investments in marriage and cohabitation: The role of legal and interpersonal commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(2), 357–376. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00954.x.

  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 631–660. doi:10.1086/493756.

  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. Retrieved from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/Quality.pdf .

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P. J. (2004). The wax and wane of marriage: Prospects for marriage in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 966–973. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00066.x.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 132–147. doi:10.2307/3088937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, K. (1990). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. Columbia University Press.

  • White, J. M., & Klein, D. M. (2008). Family theories (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Dr. Bahira Sherif Trask and Dr. Trent W. Maurer for their assistance and support with this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikki DiGregorio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DiGregorio, N. Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Lesbian Family Life. Sex Res Soc Policy 13, 58–72 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0211-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0211-z

Keywords

Navigation