Skip to main content
Log in

A Sensor Self-aware Distributed Consensus Filter for Simultaneous Localization and Tracking

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/Introduction

Simultaneous localization and tracking (SLAT) has become a very hot topic in both academia and industry for its potential wide applications in robotic equipment, sensor networks and smart devices. In order to exploit the advantages supported by state filtering and parameter estimation, researchers have proposed adaptive structures for solving SLAT problems. Existing solutions for SLAT problems that rely on belief propagation often have limited accuracy or high complexity. To adapt the brain decision mechanism for solving SLAT problems, we introduce a specific framework that is suitable for wireless sensor networks.

Methods

Motivated by the high efficiency and performance of brain decision making built upon partial information and information updating, we propose a cognitively distributed SLAT algorithm based on an adaptive distributed filter, which is composed of two stages for target tracking and sensor localization. The first stage is consensus filtering that updates the target state with respect to each sensor. The second stage employs a recursive parameter estimation that exploits an on-line optimization method for refining the sensor localization. As an integrated framework, each consensus filter is specific to a separate sensor subsystem and gets feedback information from its parameter estimation.

Results

The performance comparison in terms of positioning accuracy with respect to RMSE is shown and the simulation results demonstrate that the proposed ICF-RML performs better than the BPF-RML. This is expected since the distributed estimation with sufficient communication mechanism often achieves higher accuracy than that of less sufficient cases. Furthermore, the performance of the ICF-RML is comparable with that of the BPF-RML even if the latter assumes known prior network topology. We also observe from the results of tracking errors that ICF-RML accomplishes a remarkable improvement in the precision of target tracking and achieves more stable convergence than BPF-RML, in the scenario that all sensors are used to calculate the effect from data association errors.

Conclusion

We apply this approach to formulate the SLAT problem and propose an effective solution, summarized in the paper. For small-size sensor networks with Gaussian distribution, our algorithm can be implemented through a distributed version of weighted information filter and a consensus protocol. Comparing the existing method, our solution shows a higher accuracy in estimation but with less complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Song Y, Li QL, Kang YF. Conjugate unscented fastSLAM for autonomous mobile robots in large-scale environments. Cognit Comput. 2014;6:496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor C, Rahimi A, Bachrach J, Shrobe H, Grue A, Acm. Simultaneous localization, calibration, and tracking in an ad hoc sensor network. ACM/IEEE international conference on information processing in sensor networks. 2006;16–21.

  3. Li WL, Jia YM, Du JP, Zhang J. Distributed multiple-model estimation for simultaneous localization and tracking with NLOS mitigation. Veh Technol IEEE Trans. 2013;62(6):2824–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Teng J, Snoussi H, Richard C, Zhou R. Distributed variational filtering for simultaneous sensor localization and target tracking in wireless sensor networks. Veh Technol IEEE Trans. 2012;61(5):2305–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang XY, Lu B, Ren P, Luo CB, Wang XH. Augmented filtering based on information weighted consensus fusion for simultaneous localization and tracking via wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw. 2015;2015(2):1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang XY, Ren P. Augmented consensus filter for simultaneous localization and tracking with limited sense range. Ann Telecommun. 2016;. doi:10.1007/s12243-016-0536-5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kantas N, Singh SS, Doucet A. Distributed maximum likelihood for simultaneous self-localization and tracking in sensor networks. Signal Process IEEE Trans. 2012;60(10):5038–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer F, Hlinka O, Wymeersch H, Riegler E, Hlawatsch F. Distributed localization and tracking of mobile networks including noncooperative objects. Signal Inf Process Over Netw IEEE Trans. 2016;2(1):57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grime S, Durrant-Whyte HF. Data fusion in decentralized sensor networks. Control Eng Pract. 1994;2(5):849–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Olfati-Saber R, Sandell NF. Distributed tracking in sensor networks with limited sensing range. American control conference. 2008;3157–3162.

  11. Cervantes JA, Rodriguez LF, Lopez S, Ramos F, Robles F. Autonomous agents and ethical decision-making. Cognit Comput. 2016;8(2):278–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang T, Shadlen MN. Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature. 2007;447:1075–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi YK, Roesch MR, Stalnaker TA, Haney RZ, Calu DJ, et al. The orbitofrontal cortex and ventral tegmental area are necessary for learning from unexpected outcomes. Neuron. 2009;62(2):269–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamal AT, Farrell JA, Roy-Chowdhury AK. Information-weighted consensus filters and their application in distributed camera networks. Autom Control IEEE Trans. 2013;58(12):3112–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang XY, Zhang HS, Wei W. NLOS error mitigation with information fusion algorithm for UWB ranging systems. J China Univ Posts Telecommun. 2012;19(2):22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kantas N, Singh SS, Doucet A. A distributed recursive maximum likelihood implementation for sensor registration. 9th international conference on information fusion, Piscataway, NJ, USA, July 10–13. 2006; p. 1–8.

  17. Veale T, Li GF. Distributed divergent creativity: computational creative agents at web scale. Cognit Comput. 2016;8(2):175–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yuan K, Ling Q, Tian Z. Communication-efficient decentralized event monitoring in wireless sensor networks. Parallel Distrib Syst IEEE Trans. 2015;26:2198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acnowledgments

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61503413 and 61411130134), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. ZR2015FL027), Shandong Outstanding Young Scientist Fund (Grant No. BS2013DX006), the UK Royal Society (Grant no. IE131036) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Ren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Xiangyuan Jiang, Peng Ren and Chunbo Luo declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was not required as no humans or animals were involved.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, X., Ren, P. & Luo, C. A Sensor Self-aware Distributed Consensus Filter for Simultaneous Localization and Tracking. Cogn Comput 8, 828–838 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-016-9423-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-016-9423-7

Keywords

Navigation