Literatur
Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG et al (2013) Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:35
Suinesiaputra A, Bluemke DA, Cowan BR, Friedrich MG, Kramer CM, Kwong R et al (2015) Quantification of LV function and mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: multi-center variability and consensus contours. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17:63
Leiner T, Rueckert D, Suinesiaputra A, Baessler B, Nezafat R, Isgum I et al (2019) Machine learning in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: basic concepts and applications. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 21:61
European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2019) What the radiologist should know about artificial intelligence—an ESR white paper. Insights Imaging 10:44
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
F. von Knobelsdorff gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
von Knobelsdorff, F. Arzt oder künstliche Intelligenz: Wer wertet ein Herz-MRT präziser aus?. Kardiologe 14, 126–129 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-019-00374-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-019-00374-z