Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Willingness to share, impulsivity and the Dark Triad traits

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to test hypotheses regarding a form of social discounting in which the subjective value of a reward decreases as a function of the number of people it is shared with. Along with the Short Dark Triad measure, participants (N = 284) completed a social discounting task in which they were asked to make choices between a hypothetical amount of money to keep for themselves and a hypothetical amount of money to share with a specified number of people. They also competed a delay discounting task, in which they were asked to make choices between immediate small outcomes and delayed bigger outcomes. To probe the unique contribution of three Dark Triad traits predicting both discounting types, we conducted separated multiple linear regression analyses. The study revealed that the higher one’s psychopathy and Machiavellianism, the greater one’s social discounting, indicating more selfishness and lack of willingness to share with other people. On the other hand, the higher one’s narcissism, the smaller one’s social discounting, indicating more willingness to share. These findings place in doubt the selfishness of narcissism. Second, in case of delay discounting, only psychopathy and narcissism predicted steep delay discounting, suggesting that individuals who score high in psychopathy and narcissism tend to obtain rather immediate outcomes. Also, Machiavellianism was not significantly associated with delay discounting. Finally, a positive correlation was observed between delay and social discounting. The results indicated that social discounting was related to, but not equivalent to, delay discounting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 463–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Franck, C. T., Carrin, C., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012). Altruism in time: Social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers. Psychopharmacology, 224(1), 109–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Narcissistic personality disorder. In Practitioner’s guide to evidence-based psychotherapy (pp. 423–431). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., Bush, C. P., Brunell, A. B., & Shelton, J. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1358–1368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The Dark Triad and risk behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, H. (2008). Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: A review of underlying processes. Addiction Biology, 14, 22–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, H., Flory, J. D., Acheson, A., McCloskey, M., & Manuck, S. B. (2007). IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(1), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. D., & Trimm IV, R. F. (2008). On being eager and uninhibited: Narcissism and approach–avoidance motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 1004–1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2002). Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, W. A., & Hartnagel, T. (1976). The impact of Machiavellianism and the trustfulness of the victim on laboratory theft. Sociometry, 39(2), 157–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman, N. S., Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. (2010). Sounds like a narcissist: Behavioral manifestations of narcissism in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 478–484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2008). An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(3), 264–274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Krause, L. (2013). The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 532–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond?: The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Strosser, G. L., Kroll, C. H., Duineveld, J. J., & Baruffi, S. A. (2015). Valuing myself over others: The Dark Triad traits and moral and social values. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Learyc & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 679–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. N., & Finch, J. C. (2010). The hierarchical structure of self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 704–713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., & Houser, D. (2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S37–S52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannin, D. G., Guyll, M., Krizan, Z., Madon, S., & Cornish, M. (2014). When are grandiose and vulnerable narcissists least helpful? Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locey, M. L., Jones, B. A., & Rachlin, H. (2011). Real and hypothetical rewards. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(6), 552.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and beurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: APA Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(2), 139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malesza, M. (2017). Testing the construct validity of the Discounting Inventory–Psychometric properties of a Polish and German samples. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 48(1), 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malesza, M. (2018a). The effects of the Dark Triad traits in prisoner’s dilemma game. Current Psychology, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9823-9.

  • Malesza, M. (2018b). The reduced discounting inventory-construction and initial validation. Current Psychology, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9972-x.

  • Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2016). Dark side of impulsivity—Associations between the Dark Triad, self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2017). Assessing individual differences in discounting: Construction and initial validation of the discounting inventory. Current Psychology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9754-x.

  • Malesza, M., Ostaszewski, P., Büchner, S., & Kaczmarek, M. C. (2017). The adaptation of the short Dark Triad personality measure–Psychometric properties of a German sample. Current Psychology, 1–10.

  • McKerchar, T. L., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). On the scaling interpretation of exponents in hyperboloid models of delay and probability discounting. Behavioural Processes, 84(1), 440–444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Keith Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235–243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. A. (2008). Altruism among relatives and non-relatives. Behavioural Processes, 79, 120–123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H., & Raineri, A. (1992). Irrationality, impulsiveness, and selfishness as discount reversal effects. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 93–118). New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(2), 159–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2006). Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2008). Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: A comparison of tasks and modes. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 940–953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K.M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D.L. (2003). Structure and validity of the self-report psychopathy scale-III in normal populations. Toronto, Canada: Presentation at the 111th annual convention of the American Psychological Association.

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Centre in Poland (grant number: 2013/11/N/HS6/01149).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Warsaw, Poland

    Marta Malesza

  2. Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sociology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland

    Kasper Kalinowski

Authors
  1. Marta Malesza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kasper Kalinowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Author Marta Malesza declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Kasper Kalinowski declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malesza, M., Kalinowski, K. Willingness to share, impulsivity and the Dark Triad traits. Curr Psychol 40, 3888–3896 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00351-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00351-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation