Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual Compliance: Examining the Relationships Among Sexual Want, Sexual Consent, and Sexual Assertiveness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unwanted sexual encounters include a broad spectrum of behaviors that may include everything from regretted or coerced sex to sexual assault and rape. Sadly, experience with unwanted sex is all too common among college aged women. A number of factors have been examined in the context of sexual interactions in this population including relationship status, sexual want, sexual assertiveness, and sexual consent. However, research to date lacks analyses which consider the potentially interactive nature of the aforementioned variables in sexual decision making. To that end, the present study examined the role of relationship status, sexual want, and sexual assertiveness on self-report consent in a sexual encounter. Female undergraduate students (N = 319) self-reported on their relationship status, as well as their sexual want (desire to engage in sexual activity), sexual assertiveness, and sexual consent behaviors within the context of their most recent sexual experience. A moderated multiple regression was conducted to determine whether sexual assertiveness moderated self-reported sexual want and consent. Relationship status was included as the primary predictor in the aforementioned model. The overall model was significant, indicating an interaction model of sexual decision-making. Generally, women displayed increased sexual consent behavior as sexual want increased across levels of sexual assertiveness, regardless of relationship status. Importantly, women low in sexual assertiveness were high in sexual compliance (i.e. consenting to/engaging in sexual activity even when self-reported sexual want was low).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, J., & Smith, S. (2013). Development and validation of the endorsement of the hookup culture index. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex selationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037428.41757.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernston, M., Hoffman, K., & Luff, T. (2014). College as context: Influences on interpersonal sexual scripts. Sexuality and Culture, 18, 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkett, M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15, 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S. H., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Thomas, G., & Westat, Inc. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct.

  • Fair, C. D., & Vanyur, J. (2011). Sexual coercion, verbal aggression, and condom use consistency among college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(4), 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, R., Walsh, J., Carey, K., & Carey, M. (2014). Sexual hookups and adverse health outcomes: A longitudinal study of first-year college women. Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S. (2009). The effects of survey question wording on rape estimates: Evidence from a quasi-experimental design. Violence Against Women, 15, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208329391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flack, W. F., Jr., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., et al. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J., Reiber, C., Massey, S., & Merriwether, A. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D., & Navarro, R. L. (1998). Situation-specific assertiveness in the epidemiology of sexual victimization among university women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00179.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, K., & Faulkner, S. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53, 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701586706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impett, E. A., Peplau, L. A., & Gable, S. L. (2005). Approach and avoidance sexual motives: Implications for personal and interpersonal well-being. Personal Relationships, 12, 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00126.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014a). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jozkowski, K. N., Sanders, S., Peterson, Z. D., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014b). Consenting to sexual activity: The development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. A., Testa, M., & VanZile-Tamsen, C. (2007). The reciprocal relationship between sexual victimization and sexual assertiveness. Violence Against Women, 13, 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206297339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morokoff, P. J., Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Whitmire, L., Grimley, D. M., Gibson, P. R., et al. (1997). Sexual assertiveness scale (SAS) for women: Development and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 790–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Peterson, Z. D. (2005). Wanting and not wanting sex: The missing discourse of ambivalence. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353505049698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Rodgers, C. S. (1998). Token resistance to sex: New perspectives on an old stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00167.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, S., Billen, R., Conrad, K., Palsey, K., & Fincham, F. (2013). Sex, commitment, and casual sex relationships among college men: A mixed-methods analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. F. (2005). Sexual coercion in dating relationships: Conceptual and methodological issues. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. F., & Gaines, M. E. (1998). Decision-making in college students’ heterosexual dating relationships: Ambivalence about engaging in sexual activity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598153003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. S., McMahon, T. J., Rounsaville, B. J., & Ball, S. A. (2010). Coercive sexual experiences, protective behavioral strategies, alcohol expectancies and consumption among male and female college students. Journal of interpersonal violence, 25(9), 1563–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the ‘wantedness’ of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2010). Sex without desire: Characteristics of occasions of sexual compliance in young adults’ committed relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903132051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. P., Messman-Moore, T. L., & Ward, R. (2011). Number of sexual partners and sexual assertiveness predict sexual victimization: Do more partners equal more risk? Violence and Victims, 26, 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.6.774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, J. (2006). Sexual assertiveness in low-income African American women: Unwanted sex, survival, and HIV risk. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 23, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327655jchn2304_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslett, A. H., & Gross, A. M. (2008). Sexual boundaries: An examination of the importance of talking before touching. Violence Against Women, 14, 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208315527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677, USA

    Marie C. Darden, Anandi C. Ehman, Elicia C. Lair & Alan M. Gross

Authors
  1. Marie C. Darden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anandi C. Ehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elicia C. Lair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alan M. Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan M. Gross.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animals Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Additional information

This work is based on the first author’s master’s thesis research conducted under the supervision of the third and fourth authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darden, M.C., Ehman, A.C., Lair, E.C. et al. Sexual Compliance: Examining the Relationships Among Sexual Want, Sexual Consent, and Sexual Assertiveness. Sexuality & Culture 23, 220–235 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9551-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9551-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation