Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antenatally Diagnosed Surgical Conditions: Fetus As Our Patient

  • Review Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today’s era of improved antenatal care and screening modalities (3D high-resolution fetal ultrasound, fetal magnetic resonance imaging, fetal echocardiography, maternal serum markers and fetal blood sampling), an early diagnosis of surgical fetal abnormalities is routinely possible. A thorough knowledge about the incidence of such defects, the means of detection and evaluation, the scope of fetal intervention, postnatal management and long-term outcomes of common surgical conditions diagnosed antenatally is essential. This knowledge would not only help in proper patient care and management but also to ensure appropriate counselling of the expectant parents. This article highlights the fetal anomalies which are amenable to some form of fetal intervention from a pediatric surgical perspective as also those which can be treated after birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta DK, Sharma S, Gupta M. Outcome of antenatally referred congenital surgical anomalies—a pediatric surgeon’s perspective. J Pediatr Surg Spec. 2010;4:1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lakhoo K. Fetal Counselling for Surgical Congenital Malformations. In: Puri P, Höllwarth M, editors. Pediatric Surgery. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 9–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bianchi DW, Crombleholme TM, D'Alton ME, Malone FD. Fetology: Diagnosis and Management of the Fetal Patient. 2nd ed. New York: The Mc Graw Hill; 2000.

  4. Gupta DK. Prenatally diagnosed surgical malformations – who should decide next? J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2006;11:7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rai SK, Singh R, Pandey S, et al. High incidence of neural tube defects in Northern part of India. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016;11:352–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardoza JD, Filly RA, Podrasky AE. The dangling choroid plexus: a sonographic observation of value in excluding ventriculomegaly. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:767–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson MP, Bennett KA, Rand L, et al; Management of Myelomeningocele Study Investigators. The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: obstetrical outcomes and risk factors for obstetrical complications following prenatal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:778.e1-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sutton LN, Adzick NS, Bilaniuk LT, Johnson MP, Crombleholme TM, Flake AW. Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA. 1999;282:1826–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruner JP, Tulipan N, Paschall RL, et al. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA. 1999;282:1819–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moldenhauer JS, Adzick NS. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: after the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22:360–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hedrick HL. Management of prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2013;22:37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrison MR, Keller RL, Hawgood SB, et al. A randomized trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1916–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deprest J, Gratacos E, Nicolaides KH, et al. Fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evolution of a technique and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:121–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reiss I, Schaible T, van den Hout L, et al. CDH EURO Consortium. Standardized postnatal management of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: the CDH Euro Consortium consensus. Neonatology. 2010;98:354–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hernanz-Schulman M. Cysts and cyst like lesions of the lung. Radiol Clin N Am. 1993;31:631–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Crombleholme TM, Flake AW, Howell LJ. Fetal lung lesions: management and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:884–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adzick NS. Management of fetal lung lesions. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36:363–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peranteau WH, Wilson RD, Liechty KW, et al. Effect of maternal betamethasone administration on prenatal congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation growth and fetal survival. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22:365–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crombleholme TM, Coleman B, Hedrick H, et al. Cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio predicts outcome in prenatally diagnosed cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:331–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson N, Clautice-Engle T, Allan R, Abbott G, Wells SE. Detection of obstructive uropathy in the fetus: predictive value of sonographic measurements of renal pelvic diameter at various gestational ages. AJR. 1995;164:719–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23:478–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zanetta VC, Rosman BM, Bromley B, et al. Variations in management of mild prenatal hydronephrosis among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, and pediatric urologists and radiologists. J Urol. 2012;188:1935–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arger PH, Coleman BG, Mintz MC, et al. Routine fetal genitourinary tract screening. Radiology. 1985;156:485–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Morris RK, Malin GL, Quinlan-Jones E, et al. The Percutaneous shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (PLUTO) study and randomised controlled trial: evaluation of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1–232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Crombleholme TM, Harrison MR, Golbus MS, et al. Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:1239–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nicolini U, Fisk NM, Rodeck CH, et al. Fetal urine biochemistry: an index of renal maturation and dysfunction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:46–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2001–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lakasing L, Cicero S, Davenport M, Patel S, Nicolides KH. Current outcome of antenatally diagnosed exomphalos: an 11 year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:1403–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Virgone C, D'antonio F, Khalil A, Jonh R, Manzoli L, Giuliani S. Accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in detecting jejunal and ileal atresia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:523–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Platt LD, Devore GR, Pretorius DH. Improving cleft palate/cleft lip antenatal diagnosis by 3-dimensional sonography: the ‘flipped face’ view. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1423–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kazan-Tannus JF, Levine D, McKenzie C, et al. Real time magnetic resonance imaging aids prenatal diagnosis of isolated cleft palate. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1533–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kitagawa H, Pringle KC. Fetal surgery: a critical review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33:421–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lorenz HP, Longaker MT. In utero surgery for cleft lip/palate: minimizing the “Ripple Effect” of scarring. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:504–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Graf JL, Albanese CT. Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. World J Surg. 2003;27:84–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Billmire DF, Grosfeld JL. Teratomas in childhood: analysis of 142 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21:548–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Westerburg B, Feldstein VA, Sandberg PL, Lopoo JB, Harrison MR, Albanese CT. Sonographic prognostic factors in fetuses with sacro-coccygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:322–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hedrick HL, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: prenatal assessment, fetal intervention, andoutcome. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:430–8; discussion 430–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spitz L, Kiely EM, Morecroft JA, Drake DP. Oesophageal atresia: at-risk groups for the 1990s. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:723–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sharma S, Bhanot R, Deka D, Bajpai M, Gupta DK. Impact of fetal counseling on outcome of antenatal congenital surgical anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33:203–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Raboei EH. The role of the pediatric surgeon in the perinatal multidisciplinary team. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008;18:313–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nef S, Neuhaus TJ, Spartà G, et al. Outcome after prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175:667–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Garabedian C, Bonnard A, Rousseau V, et al. Management and outcome of neonates with a prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia type A: a population based study. Prenat Diagn. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5273. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KK: Collection of data and preparation of draft manuscript; AKD: Preparation of manuscript; VB: Conceptualising, planning, finalising the paper and will act as guarantor for this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veereshwar Bhatnagar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khanna, K., Dhua, A.K. & Bhatnagar, V. Antenatally Diagnosed Surgical Conditions: Fetus As Our Patient. Indian J Pediatr 85, 1101–1109 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-018-2732-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-018-2732-y

Keywords

Navigation