Abstract
Introduction
Sunitinib, an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, delays disease progression, with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 2 years, improves quality of life and is becoming the first-line standard of care for metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC).
Purpose
To assess the economic value of sunitinib as first-line therapy in mRCC within the Spanish healthcare system.
Methods
An adapted Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was used to analyse the cost effectiveness of sunitinib vs. sorafenib (SFN) and bevacizumab/interferon-α (BEV/IFN) as first-line mRCC therapy from the Spanish third-party payer perspective. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS data from sunitinib, SFN and BEV/IFN pivotal trials were extrapolated to project survival and costs in 6-week cycles. Results, in progression-free life-years (PFLY), life years (LY) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) with costs and benefits discounted annually at 3%, were obtained using deterministic and probabilistic analyses.
Results
Sunitinib was more effective and less costly than both SFN (gains of 0.52 PFLY, 0.16 LY, 0.17 QALY) and BEV/IFN (gains of 0.19 PFLY, 0.23 LY, 0.16 QALY) with average cost savings/patients of €,124 and €23,218, respectively. Using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €50,000/QALY, sunitinib achieved an incremental net benefit (INB) of €9,717 and €31,211 compared with SFN and BEV/IFN, respectively. At this WTP, the probability of sunitinib providing the highest INB was 75%.
Conclusion
Our analysis suggests that sunitinib is a cost-effective alternative to other targeted therapies as first-line mRCC therapy in the Spanish healthcare setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gupta K, Miller JD, Li JZ et al (2008) Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 34:193–205
Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:115–124
Motzer RJ, Agarwal N, Beard C et al on behalf of NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel Members (2009) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Kidney Cancer V.2.2010. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/kidney.pdf (accessed 16 December 2009)
Coppin C, Porzsolt F, Awa A et al (2004) Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001425.pub2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001425.pub2
Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P et al (2007) Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 370:2103–2111
Escudier B, Szczylik C, Hutson TE et al (2009) Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27:1280–1289
Ljungberg B, Hanbury DC, Kuczyk MA et al (2009) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma (update March 2009). Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/fileadmin/tx_eauguidelines/2009/Full/RCC.pdf (accessed 15 December 2009)
Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. La situación del cancer en España (2005) Available at: http://www.msc.es/ciudadanos/enfLesiones/enf-NoTransmisibles/cancer/home.htm (accessed 26 October 2009)
López-Abente G, Pollán M, Aragonés N et al (2004) Situación del cáncer en España: incidencia [State of cancer in Spain: incidence]. An Sist Sanit Navar 27:165–173
Mills EJ, Rachlis B, O’Regan C et al (2009) Metastatic renal cell cancer treatments: an indirect comparison meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 9:34
Patard J-J (2009) Treatment algorithms in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including the potential role of the novel oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus. Eur Urol Suppl 8: 809–814
Abrams TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ et al (2003) SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2: 471–478
Kontovinis LF, Papazisis KT, Touplikioti P et al (2009) Sunitinib treatment for patients with clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and plasma angiogenesis markers. BMC Cancer 9:82
Christensen JG (2007) A preclinical review of sunitinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic and antitumour activities. Ann Oncol 18[Suppl 10]:x3–10
Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2009) Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27: 3584–3590
NICE (2009) National Institute for Health and Clinical Experience technology appraisal guidance 169: sunitinib for the first-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA169Guidance.pdf. Issued March 2009. Updated February 2011 (Accessed 16 December 2009)
Bellmunt J, Flodgren P, Roigas J, Oudard S (2009) Optimal management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an algorithm for treatment. BJU Int 104:10–18
Thompson Coon J, Hoyle M, Green C et al (2010) Bevacizumab, sorafenib tosylate, sunitinib and temsirolimus for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 14:1–184
Thompson Coon JS, Liu Z, Hoyle M et al (2009) Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness. Br J Cancer 101:238–243
Escudier BJ, Bellmunt J, Négrier S et al (2009) Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (AVOREN): final analysis of overall survival. J Clin Oncol 28:2144–2150
Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ (2003) Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ 326: 472
Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T et al (2009) Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ 338: b1147
Remák E, Charbonneau C, Négrier S et al (2008) Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 26:3995–4000
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds) (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Drummond M, McGuire A (eds) (2001) Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Figlin RA, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2008) Overall survival with sunitinib versus interferon (IFN)-alfa as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) [abstract 5024]. Program and abstracts of the 44th American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting May 30–June 3, Chicago, IL
Négrier S, Figlin RA, Hutson TE et al (2008) Overall survival with sunitinib versus interferonalfa as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma [abstract 588PD]. Program and abstracts of the 33rd European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, September 12–16, Stockholm, Sweden
Szczylik C, Demkow T, Staehler M et al (2007) Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: final results [abstract # 5025]. Proceedings from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Conference, 2007, Chicago, IL. J Clin Oncol, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 25, No. 18S [June 20 Supplement]:5025
Bukowski RM, Eisen T, Szczylik C et al (2007) Final results of the randomized phase III trial of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: survival and biomarker analysis [abstract 5023]. J Clin Oncol ASCO 25[suppl Part 1]:Abstract 5023. ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. Available at: http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Meetings/Abstracts?&vmview=abst_detail_view&confID=47&abstractID=33741
Motzer RJ, Rini BI, Bukowski RM et al (2006) Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA 295:2516–2524
Motzer RJ, Michaelson MD, Redman BG et al (2006) Activity of SU11248, a multi-targeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24:16–24
Oblikue Consulting, Barcelona, Spain. Base de Datos de Costes Sanitarios eSalud. http://www.oblikue.com/bddcostes
Catálogo de Especialidades Farmacéuticas. Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos. Available at: http://www.portalfarma.com
Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD (1997) The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 50:683–691
Belldegrun AS, Klatte T, Shuch B et al (2008) Cancer-specific survival outcomes among patients treated during the cytokine era of kidney cancer (1989–2005): a benchmark for emerging targeted cancer therapies. Cancer 113:2457–2463
Briggs A, Sculpher M (1998) An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 13:397–409
Frye RL, Brooks MM, Nesto RW (2003) Gap between clinical trials and clinical practice: lessons from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation 107:1837–1839
Norum J, Nieder C, Kondo M (2010) Sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus or bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a review of health economic evaluations. J Chemother 22:75–82
Benedict A, Figlin RA, Charbonneau C et al (2009) Economic evaluation of sunitinib versus other new targeted therapies as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the United States. ASCO Meeting Abstracts [abstract e17556]. J Clin Oncol 27[Suppl 15]
Munir U, Benedict A, Borgman B et al (2008) Cost-effectiveness of sunitinib (SU) vs sorafenib (SFN), temsirolimus (TMS) and bevacizumab 1 interferon-alfa (BEV/IFN) as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): adaptation for the Swedish Health Service [abstract 725P]. Ann Oncol 19[Suppl 8]:228
Díaz S, Calvo Aller E, Maroto P et al (2008) Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of sunitinib (SU) vs sorafenib (SFN) and be vacizumab+ interferon-alfa (BEV/IFN) as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Spain. 33rd ESMO Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, 12–16 September 2008 [abstract 724P]. Ann Oncol 19[Suppl 8]:227
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
At present these authors are not working at Pfizer Spain.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calvo Aller, E., Maroto, P., Kreif, N. et al. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 13, 869–877 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0748-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0748-0