Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Spain

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Sunitinib, an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, delays disease progression, with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 2 years, improves quality of life and is becoming the first-line standard of care for metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC).

Purpose

To assess the economic value of sunitinib as first-line therapy in mRCC within the Spanish healthcare system.

Methods

An adapted Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was used to analyse the cost effectiveness of sunitinib vs. sorafenib (SFN) and bevacizumab/interferon-α (BEV/IFN) as first-line mRCC therapy from the Spanish third-party payer perspective. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS data from sunitinib, SFN and BEV/IFN pivotal trials were extrapolated to project survival and costs in 6-week cycles. Results, in progression-free life-years (PFLY), life years (LY) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) with costs and benefits discounted annually at 3%, were obtained using deterministic and probabilistic analyses.

Results

Sunitinib was more effective and less costly than both SFN (gains of 0.52 PFLY, 0.16 LY, 0.17 QALY) and BEV/IFN (gains of 0.19 PFLY, 0.23 LY, 0.16 QALY) with average cost savings/patients of €,124 and €23,218, respectively. Using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €50,000/QALY, sunitinib achieved an incremental net benefit (INB) of €9,717 and €31,211 compared with SFN and BEV/IFN, respectively. At this WTP, the probability of sunitinib providing the highest INB was 75%.

Conclusion

Our analysis suggests that sunitinib is a cost-effective alternative to other targeted therapies as first-line mRCC therapy in the Spanish healthcare setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta K, Miller JD, Li JZ et al (2008) Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 34:193–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:115–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Motzer RJ, Agarwal N, Beard C et al on behalf of NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel Members (2009) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Kidney Cancer V.2.2010. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/kidney.pdf (accessed 16 December 2009)

  4. Coppin C, Porzsolt F, Awa A et al (2004) Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001425.pub2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001425.pub2

  5. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P et al (2007) Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 370:2103–2111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Escudier B, Szczylik C, Hutson TE et al (2009) Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27:1280–1289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ljungberg B, Hanbury DC, Kuczyk MA et al (2009) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma (update March 2009). Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/fileadmin/tx_eauguidelines/2009/Full/RCC.pdf (accessed 15 December 2009)

  8. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. La situación del cancer en España (2005) Available at: http://www.msc.es/ciudadanos/enfLesiones/enf-NoTransmisibles/cancer/home.htm (accessed 26 October 2009)

  9. López-Abente G, Pollán M, Aragonés N et al (2004) Situación del cáncer en España: incidencia [State of cancer in Spain: incidence]. An Sist Sanit Navar 27:165–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mills EJ, Rachlis B, O’Regan C et al (2009) Metastatic renal cell cancer treatments: an indirect comparison meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 9:34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patard J-J (2009) Treatment algorithms in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including the potential role of the novel oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus. Eur Urol Suppl 8: 809–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abrams TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ et al (2003) SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2: 471–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kontovinis LF, Papazisis KT, Touplikioti P et al (2009) Sunitinib treatment for patients with clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and plasma angiogenesis markers. BMC Cancer 9:82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen JG (2007) A preclinical review of sunitinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic and antitumour activities. Ann Oncol 18[Suppl 10]:x3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2009) Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27: 3584–3590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. NICE (2009) National Institute for Health and Clinical Experience technology appraisal guidance 169: sunitinib for the first-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA169Guidance.pdf. Issued March 2009. Updated February 2011 (Accessed 16 December 2009)

  17. Bellmunt J, Flodgren P, Roigas J, Oudard S (2009) Optimal management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an algorithm for treatment. BJU Int 104:10–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson Coon J, Hoyle M, Green C et al (2010) Bevacizumab, sorafenib tosylate, sunitinib and temsirolimus for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 14:1–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson Coon JS, Liu Z, Hoyle M et al (2009) Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness. Br J Cancer 101:238–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Escudier BJ, Bellmunt J, Négrier S et al (2009) Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (AVOREN): final analysis of overall survival. J Clin Oncol 28:2144–2150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ (2003) Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ 326: 472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T et al (2009) Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ 338: b1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Remák E, Charbonneau C, Négrier S et al (2008) Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 26:3995–4000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds) (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  25. Drummond M, McGuire A (eds) (2001) Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  26. Figlin RA, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2008) Overall survival with sunitinib versus interferon (IFN)-alfa as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) [abstract 5024]. Program and abstracts of the 44th American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting May 30–June 3, Chicago, IL

  27. Négrier S, Figlin RA, Hutson TE et al (2008) Overall survival with sunitinib versus interferonalfa as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma [abstract 588PD]. Program and abstracts of the 33rd European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, September 12–16, Stockholm, Sweden

  28. Szczylik C, Demkow T, Staehler M et al (2007) Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: final results [abstract # 5025]. Proceedings from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Conference, 2007, Chicago, IL. J Clin Oncol, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 25, No. 18S [June 20 Supplement]:5025

  29. Bukowski RM, Eisen T, Szczylik C et al (2007) Final results of the randomized phase III trial of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: survival and biomarker analysis [abstract 5023]. J Clin Oncol ASCO 25[suppl Part 1]:Abstract 5023. ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. Available at: http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Meetings/Abstracts?&vmview=abst_detail_view&confID=47&abstractID=33741

  30. Motzer RJ, Rini BI, Bukowski RM et al (2006) Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA 295:2516–2524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Motzer RJ, Michaelson MD, Redman BG et al (2006) Activity of SU11248, a multi-targeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24:16–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Oblikue Consulting, Barcelona, Spain. Base de Datos de Costes Sanitarios eSalud. http://www.oblikue.com/bddcostes

  33. Catálogo de Especialidades Farmacéuticas. Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos. Available at: http://www.portalfarma.com

  34. Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD (1997) The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 50:683–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Belldegrun AS, Klatte T, Shuch B et al (2008) Cancer-specific survival outcomes among patients treated during the cytokine era of kidney cancer (1989–2005): a benchmark for emerging targeted cancer therapies. Cancer 113:2457–2463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Briggs A, Sculpher M (1998) An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 13:397–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Frye RL, Brooks MM, Nesto RW (2003) Gap between clinical trials and clinical practice: lessons from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation 107:1837–1839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Norum J, Nieder C, Kondo M (2010) Sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus or bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a review of health economic evaluations. J Chemother 22:75–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Benedict A, Figlin RA, Charbonneau C et al (2009) Economic evaluation of sunitinib versus other new targeted therapies as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the United States. ASCO Meeting Abstracts [abstract e17556]. J Clin Oncol 27[Suppl 15]

  40. Munir U, Benedict A, Borgman B et al (2008) Cost-effectiveness of sunitinib (SU) vs sorafenib (SFN), temsirolimus (TMS) and bevacizumab 1 interferon-alfa (BEV/IFN) as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): adaptation for the Swedish Health Service [abstract 725P]. Ann Oncol 19[Suppl 8]:228

    Google Scholar 

  41. Díaz S, Calvo Aller E, Maroto P et al (2008) Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of sunitinib (SU) vs sorafenib (SFN) and be vacizumab+ interferon-alfa (BEV/IFN) as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Spain. 33rd ESMO Congress, Stockholm, Sweden, 12–16 September 2008 [abstract 724P]. Ann Oncol 19[Suppl 8]:227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emiliano Calvo Aller.

Additional information

At present these authors are not working at Pfizer Spain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calvo Aller, E., Maroto, P., Kreif, N. et al. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 13, 869–877 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0748-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0748-0

Keywords

Navigation