Skip to main content
Log in

A unified network performance measure with importance identification and the ranking of network components

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose the first network performance measure that can be used to assess the efficiency of a network in the case of either fixed or elastic demands. Such a measure is needed for many different applications since only when the performance of a network can be quantifiably measured can the network be appropriately managed. Moreover, as we demonstrate, the proposed performance measure, which captures flow information and behavior, allows one to determine the criticality of various nodes (as well as links) through the identification of their importance and ranking. We present specific networks for which the performance/efficiency is computed along with the importance rankings of the nodes and links. The new measure can be applied to transportation networks, supply chains, financial networks, electric power generation and distribution networks as well as to the Internet and can be used to assess the vulnerability of a network to disruptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barabási A.L. and Albert R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509–512

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Beckmann M.J., McGuire C.B. and Winsten C.B. (1956). Studies in the Economics of Transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boginski V., Butenko S., Pardalos P.M. (2003) On structural properties of the market graph. In: Nagurney A. (ed). Innovations in Financial and Economic Networks. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 29-45

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braess D. (1968). Uber ein paradoxon aus der verkehrsplanung. Unternehmenforschung 12: 258–268

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chassin D.P. and Posse C. (2005). Evaluating North American electric grid reliability using the Barabási-Albert network model. Physica A 355: 667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dafermos S. (1980). Traffic equilibrium and variational inequalities. Transport. Sci. 14: 42–54

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dafermos S. (1982). The general multimodal network equilibrium problem with elastic demand. Networks   12: 57–72

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dafermos S.C. and Sparrow F.T. (1969). The traffic assignment problem for a general network. J. Res. Nat. Bureau Stand. 73: 91–118

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhanda K.K., Nagurney A. and Ramanujam P. (1999). Environmental Networks: A Framework for Economic Decision-Making and Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erdös P. and Rényi A. (1960). On the evolution of random graphs. Public Math. Inst. Hungary Acad. Sci. 5: 17–61

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenelius E., Petersen T. and Mattsson L.G. (2006). Road network vulnerability: Identifying important links and exposed regions. Transport. Res. A 20: 537–560

    Google Scholar 

  12. Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, Article No. 198701 (2001)

  13. Latora V. and Marchiori M. (2003). Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 32:  249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Latora V. and Marchiori M. (2004). How the science of complex networks can help developing strategies against terrorism. Chaos Solitons Fractals 20: 69–75

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Z., Nagurney, A.: Financial networks with intermediation and transportation network equilibria: A supernetwork equivalence and computational management reinterpretation of the equilibrium conditions with computations. Comput. Manage. Sci. (2006, in press)

  16. Murray-Tuite P.M. and Mahmassani H.S. (2004). Methodology for determining vulnerable links in a transportation network. Transport. Res. Rec. 1882: 88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagurney A. (1984). Comparative tests of multimodal traffic equilibrium methods. Transport. Res. B 18: 469–485

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagurney A. (1999). Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach. second and revised edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nagurney A. (2006). On the relationship between supply chain and transportation network equilibria: A supernetwork equivalence with computations. Transport. Res. E 42: 293–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagurney A. and Dong J. (2002). Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nagurney, A., Parkes, D., Daniele, P.: The Internet, evolutionary variational inequality, and the time-dependent Braess Paradox. Comput. Manage. Sci. (2006, in press)

  22. Nagurney A. and Zhang D. (1996). Projected Dynamical Systems and Variational Inequalities with Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newman M. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45: 167–256

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Kelly M.E., Kim H. and Kim C. (2006). Internet reliability with realistic peering. Environ. Plan. B 33: 325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheffi Y. (2005). The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith M. (1979). Existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria. Transport. Res. B 13: 259–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wardrop, J.G.: Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers, Part II 1, 325–378 (1952)

  28. Watts D.J. and Strogatz S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393: 440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu K., Nagurney A., Liu Z. and Stranlund J.K. (2006). Modeling generator power plant portfolios and pollution taxes in electric power supply chain networks: a transportation network equilibrium transformation. Transport. Res. D 11: 171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu D., Hu Y., Li Y. and Yu B. (2006). A new measure for airline networks performance evaluation and critical cities identification. Fudan University, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Nagurney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiang, Q., Nagurney, A. A unified network performance measure with importance identification and the ranking of network components. Optimization Letters 2, 127–142 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-007-0049-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-007-0049-2

Keywords

Navigation