Skip to main content
Log in

Empathy is Not a Thermometer

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We raise two objections to Slote’s article. First, empathy cannot provide information about the world in the direct way Slote proposes. Emotional contagion might be able to do so, but this type of process is different from the empathic one. Second, even if we accept his view of empathy, his claim that we make moral judgments via empathizing with the ‘warmth’ or ‘coldness’ of the actor seems misguided because, we usually empathize with the patient (not the actor), and we empathize with emotions, not “temperatures”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Slote (2009), Zahavi and Rochat (2015), and Scheler (1912/2008).

  2. Though Ekman, throughout his career, added more emotions to the list, this is controversial and still not close to including all emotions. Furthermore, we are not consistently accurate at recognizing emotions.

  3. When describing empathic bias, Hoffman says: “Although people tend to respond empathically to almost anyone in distress, they are vulnerable to bias in favor of victims who are…similar to themselves; and to bias victims who are present in the immediate situation.” (p. 14)

  4. In his response to D’Arms: Slote (2011)

References

  • Cook, M., Mineka, S., Wolkenstein, B., & Laitsch, K. (1985). Observational conditioning of snake fear in unrelated rhesus monkeys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 591–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arms, J. (2011). Empathy, approval, and disapproval in Moral Sentimentalism. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49(s1), 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3-4), 169–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3(4), 364–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, M., & Hopf, S. (1984). Behavioral responses to species-specific warning calls in infant squirrel monkeys reared in social isolation. American Journal of Primatology, 7, 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice (p. 289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineka, S., & Cook, M. (1993). Mechanisms involved in the observational conditioning of fear. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (1912/2008). The Nature of Sympathy (trans: P. Heath). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

  • Slote, M. (2009). Moral Sentimentalism (p. 15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. (2011). Reply to Justin D’Arms and Lori Watson. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49(s1), 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D., & Rochat, P. (2015). Empathy ≠ sharing: Perspectives from phenomenology and developmental psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi L. Maibom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furlane, K., Maibom, H.L. Empathy is Not a Thermometer. Philosophia 45, 861–866 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9827-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9827-y

Keywords

Navigation